Skip to main content

Queering Classes: Disrupting Hegemonic Masculinity and the Effects of Compulsory Heterosexuality in the Classroom

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Explorations of Educational Purpose ((EXEP,volume 21))

Abstract

This essay focuses on the classroom and school environment as a setting where queering masculinity has opportunity and benefit for students, teachers, and administrators, particularly as relates to boys and the learning environment. Queering is defined as the disruption of those normative attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors evidenced in the curriculum, classroom, and school culture that reinforce hegemonic heterosexuality and gender conformity. As used here, such disruption introduces a paradigm of masculinity and sexuality that has a plurality of expressions and potentialities. This requires systemic change that addresses, models, and supports ways of being masculine that might otherwise be devalued because of association with and meaning given to homosexuality. Queering, then, disrupts assumptions of masculinity and its relationship to hegemonic heterosexuality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, D. J., & Oleson, T. (1999). Shame and internalized homophobia in gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 37(3), 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. (1995). Dismantling gender polarization and compulsory heterosexuality: Should we turn the volume up or down? Journal of Sex Research, 32(4), 329–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (2001). The men and the boys. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, B., & Crane-Seeber, J. (2003). Four boxes of gendered sexuality: Good girl/bad girl and tough guy/sweet guy. In R. Heasley & B. Crane (Eds.), Sexual lives: A reader on the theories and narratives of human sexuality (pp. 196–217). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane-Seeber, J. (2007). Radicalizing our critique: Masculinity, the state, and modernity. Presentation at 14th Annual Conference of the American Men’s Studies Association, Kansas City, MO, March 30, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, R. (1987). Chalice and the blade: Our history, our future. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimbutas, M. (1982). The goddesses and the gods of old Europe. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1997). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heasley, R. (2005). Queer masculinities of straight men: A typology. Men and Masculinities, 7(3), 310–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. S. (2008). Guyland: The perilous world where boys become men. New York: Harper/Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindlon, D., & Thompson, M. (2000). Raising cain: Protecting the emotional lives of boys. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martino, W., & Kehler, M. (2006). Male teachers and the “boy problem”: An issue of recuperative masculinity politics. McGill Journal of Education, 41(2), 113–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaughey, M. (2008). The caveman mystique: pop-darwinism and the debates over sex, violence, and science. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster Online. (n.d.). Patriarchy. Retrieved October 12, 2008, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/patriarchy

  • Pinar, W. (Ed.). (2003). Queer theory in education. Journal of Homosexuality, 45(2–4), 357–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, W. (1999). Real boys: Rescuing our sons from the myths of boyhood. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renold, E. (2004). ‘Other’ boys: Negotiating non-hegemonic masculinities in the primary schools. Gender and Education, 16(2), 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. (1976). When god was a woman. New York: Dial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Town, S. J. H. (2002). Playing with fire: (Homo)sexuality and schooling in New Zealand. In K. H. Robinson, J. Irwin, & T. Ferfolja (Eds.), From here to diversity: The social impact of lesbian and gay issues in education in Australia and New Zealand (pp. 1–16). New York: Harrington Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2004). Bureau of justice statistics. Retrieved October 1, 2008, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/pjim04.htm

  • Wittig, M. (1992). The straight mind and other essays. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Heasley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heasley, R., Crane, B. (2012). Queering Classes: Disrupting Hegemonic Masculinity and the Effects of Compulsory Heterosexuality in the Classroom. In: Landreau, J., Rodriguez, N. (eds) Queer Masculinities. Explorations of Educational Purpose, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2552-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics