Advertisement

Learning Styles and Academic Outcomes: A Longitudinal Study on the Impact of a Problem-Based Learning Curriculum

  • Ciara O’Toole
Chapter
Part of the Innovation and Change in Professional Education book series (ICPE, volume 8)

Abstract

Learning styles are the preferred ways individuals have for processing knowledge. Problem-based learning (PBL) might be perceived to suit the ‘active’ learner because of the brainstorming and group work involved. However, PBL is also intended for those who prefer to learn by researching the literature, those who seek to explore complex questions, and those who like to problem-solve and apply knowledge to practice. This study profiled the learning styles of 30 speech and language therapy students in an undergraduate PBL curriculum using the Learning Styles Questionnaire (Honey & Mumford, The learning styles Helper’s guide. Maidenhead: Peter Honey Publications Ltd., 2000) and measured their styles repeatedly over a three-year period. The results indicated that students entered the course with a range of learning styles, although in general were not characterized as active learners. Following three years of PBL-based education, the students became significantly more active, although as a group remained largely reflective. Learning styles had both negative and positive associations with academic outcomes in a variety of courses over the three years. The implications for PBL and education are discussed.

References

  1. Allinson, C., & Hayes, J. (1990). Validity of the learning styles questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 67, 859–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, C. M., Pesut, D. J., McDaniel, A. M., & Fisher, M. L. (2007). Evaluating the impact of problem-based learning on learning styles of master’s students in nursing administration. Journal of Professional Nursing, 23(4), 214–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biggs, J. (1987a). Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorne, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  4. Biggs, J. (1987b). The study process questionnaire (SPQ) manual. Hawthorne, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  5. Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. London: Learning Skills and Research Centre.Google Scholar
  6. Crystal, D., Fletcher, P., & Garman, M. (1989). The grammatical analysis of language disability: A procedure for assessment and remediation (2nd ed.). London: Whurr.Google Scholar
  7. Dale, P., Price, T., Bishop, D. M. V., & Plomin, R. (2003). Outcomes of early language delays: 1 predicting persistent and transient language difficulties at 3 and 4 years. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 46, 544–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duff, A., & Duffy, T. (2002). Psychometric properties of Honey & Mumford’s Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ehrhard, B. (2000). The effect of learning style self-knowledge on student academic achievement. Humanities and Social Sciences, 61(6-A), 2267.Google Scholar
  10. Fourie, R. (2008). Problem based learning and the construction of an SLP curriculum. The South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 55, 110–131.Google Scholar
  11. Furnham, A., Jackson, C., & Miller, T. (1999). Personality, learning style and work performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 1113–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Furnham, A., & Medhurst, S. (1995). Personality correlates of academic seminar behaviour: A study of four instruments. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Honey, P. (2002). Why I am besotted with the learning cycle. In P. Honey (Ed.), Peter Honey’s articles on learning and this and that (pp. 115–116). Maidenhead: Peter Honey Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  14. Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1992). The manual of learning styles. Maidenhead: Peter Honey.Google Scholar
  15. Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (2000). The learning styles Helper’s guide. Maidenhead: Peter Honey Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  16. Kappe, F., Boekholt, L., den Rooyen, C., & Van der Flier, H. (2009). A predictive validity study of the Learning Style Questionnaire (LSQ) using multiple, specific criteria. Learning and Individual differences, 19, 464–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klein, B., McCall, L., Austin, D., & Piterman, L. (2007). A psychometric evaluation of the Learning Styles Questionnaire: 40-item version. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(1), 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kolb, D. A. (1976). Learning styles inventory: Technical manual. Boston: McBer & Company.Google Scholar
  19. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Kolb, D. A. (2000). Facilitator’s guide to learning. Boston: Hay/McBer.Google Scholar
  21. Kolb, D. A., Boyzantis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (2000). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive learning and thinking styles. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. McNeal, G., & Dwyer, F. (1999). Effect of learning style on consistent and inconsistently designed instruction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 26(3), 337–347.Google Scholar
  23. Mok, C. K. F., Dodd, B., & Whitehill, T. L. (2009). Speech-language pathology students’ approaches to learning in a problem-based learning curriculum. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11(6), 472–481.Google Scholar
  24. Price, L., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2003). Meeting the challenge of diversity: A cautionary tale about learning styles. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning and practice 10 years on. Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.Google Scholar
  25. Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Pugh, K. R., Constable, R. T., Skudlarski, P., Fulbright, R. K., et al. (1995). Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature, 373, 607–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. SPSS. (2004). SPSS for windows (Version 12.0.1). Chicago: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
  27. Sugarman, L. (1985). Kolb’s model of experiential learning: Touchstone for trainers, students, counsellors and clients. Journal of Counselling and Development, 64(December), 264–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Swailes, S., & Senior, B. (1999). The dimensionality of Honey and Mumford’s Learning Styles Questionnaire. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wun, Y., Chan, C., & Dickinson, J. (1999, December 9–11). Does short-term problem-based learning change students’ learning styles and preferences? Paper presented at the First Asia Pacific Conference on Problem Based Learning, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  30. Zwanenberg, V., Wilkinson, L., & Anderson, A. (2000). Felder and Silverman’s Index of Learning Styles and Honey & Mumford’s Learning Styles Questionnaire: How do they compare and do they predict academic achievement? Educational Psychology, 20, 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ciara O’Toole
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Speech and Hearing SciencesUniversity College CorkCorkIreland

Personalised recommendations