Advertisement

Sounds of Silence: Examining Silence in Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in Asia

Chapter
Part of the Innovation and Change in Professional Education book series (ICPE, volume 8)

Abstract

Problem-based learning (PBL) has increasingly been employed as a teaching and learning approach in higher education, particularly in medicine and dentistry. In multilingual and multicultural contexts such as English Medium of Instruction (EMI) universities in Asia, silence has been identified as one characteristic to portray Asian students. However, no in-depth qualitative work has been conducted to date on students’ silence in PBL tutorials in this context. This chapter examines students’ silence in spoken English interaction in PBL tutorials in an EMI university in Asia. A variety of means, including post-survey interviews, observations, audiovisual recording, and stimulated recall interviews are used to investigate one group of PBL students’ silence in interaction. Findings indicate students’ silence in spoken English interaction is not only a means of verbal disengagement within the group learning process but also a productive resource, a collaborative practice, a platform of handling conflicting understandings, and a signal of shifting power relations. Such a study may provide higher education teaching staff and education policy makers with useful information about small-group interaction among diverse learners in an EMI context.

Keywords

Chinese Student Productive Resource Asian Student Collaborative Practice Critical Discourse Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the reviewers and the editors, for reading and commenting on earlier versions of this chapter. I also appreciate the cooperation and contribution of all participants in my study, without whom none of this would have been possible.

References

  1. Bosse, H. M., Huwendiek, S., Skelin, S., Kirschfink, M., & Nikendei, C. (2010). Interactive film scenes for tutor training in problem-based learning (PBL): Dealing with difficult situations. BMC Medical Education, 10, 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braddock, R., Roberts, P., Zheng, C., & Guzman, T. (1995). Survey on skill development in intercultural teaching of international students. Macquarie Unversity, Asia Pacific Research Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Bridges, S., & Bartlett, B. (2009). Moving teachers: Public texts and institutional power. In R. Fitzgerald & W. Housley (Eds.), Media, policy and interaction (pp. 185–203). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  4. Bridges, S., McGrath, C., Yiu, C. K. Y., & Cheng, S. S. (2010). ‘Reassuring’ during clinical examinations: Novice and expert talk in dentistry. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 20(2), 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, A. L. (1995). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 23(8), 4–12.Google Scholar
  6. Brumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Soloway, E., & Krajcik, J. S. (1996). Learning with peers: From small group cooperation to collaborative communities. Educational Researcher, 25(8), 37–40.Google Scholar
  7. Caldas-Coulthard, C. R., & Coulthard, M. (Eds.). (1996). Texts and practics: Readings in critical discourse analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Carroll, D. (2000). Precision timing in novice-to-novice L2 conversations. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 11, 67–110.Google Scholar
  9. Chan, S. (1999). The Chinese learner – a question style. Education and Training, 41(6/7), 294–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng, X. (2000). Asian students’ reticence revisited. System, 28, 435–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Education Research, 64, 1–35.Google Scholar
  12. Dauenhauer, B. P. (1980). Silence: The phenomenon and its ontological significance. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  13. DeGrave, W. S., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Schmidt, H. G. (1996). Problem-based learning: Cognitive and metacognitive processes during problem analysis. Instructional Science, 24, 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1995). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reimann (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  15. Dolmans, D., Wolfhagen, I., & Van Der Vleuten, C. (1998). Motivational and cognitive processes influencing tutorial groups. Academic Medicine, 73(10), S22–S24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duff, P. A. (2002). The discursive co-construction of knowledge, identity, and difference: An ethnography of communication in the high school mainstream. Applied Linguistics, 23(3), 289–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: Papers in the critical study of language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  19. Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (1995). On the notion of culture in L2 lectures. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 345–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  21. Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Halth-Cooper, M. (2003). An exploration of tutors’ experiences of facilitating problem-based learning. Part 2-Implications for the facilitation of problem based learning. Nurse Education Today, 23(1), 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 21–39.Google Scholar
  25. Jackson, J. (2002). Reticence in second language case discussions: Anxiety and aspirations. System, 30, 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jackson, J. (2005). An inter-university, cross-disciplinary analysis of business education: Perceptions of business faculty in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jaworski, A. (Ed.). (1997). Silence: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  28. Jaworski, A., & Sachdev, I. (2004). Teachers’ beliefs about students’ talk and silence: Constructing academic success and failure through metapragmatic comments. Language Power and Social Process, 11, 227–246.Google Scholar
  29. Jefferson, G. (1989). Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a ‘standard maximum’ silence of approximately one second in conversation. In P. Bull & R. Derek (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 166–196). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  30. Jones, J. F. (1999). From silence to talk: Cross-cultural ideas on students' participation in academic group discussion. English for special purposes, 18(3), 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kubota, R., & Lehner, A. (2004). Toward critical contrasting rhetoric. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). TESOL methods: Changing tracks, challenging trends. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lam, C. M. H. (2006). Reciprocal adjustment by host and sojourning groups: Mainland Chinese students in Hong Kong. In M. Byram & F. Anwei (Eds.), Living and studying aboard: Research and practice (pp. 91–107). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  34. Lee, C. (1999). Learning through tutorial discussion and learners’s culture: Some preliminary observations from the views of Hong Kong Chinese tertiary students. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 12(3), 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Legg, M. (2007). From question to answer: The genre of the problem-based learning tutorial at the University of Hong Kong. English for Special Purposes, 26(3), 344–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leki, I. (2001). ‘A narrow thinking stytem’: Nonnative-English-speaking stduents in group projects across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Littlewood, W., Liu, N.-F., & Yu, C. (1996). Hong Kong Tertiary Students’ attitude and proficiency in spoken English. RELC Journal, 27(1), 70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Louis, K. S. (1982). Multisite/multimethod studies: An introduction. American Behavioral Scientist, 26(1), 6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Markee, N. (2002). Language in development [Special issue]. TESOL Quarterly, 36(3), 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morita, N. (2004). Negotiating participation and identity in second language academic communities. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 673–603.Google Scholar
  41. Nakane, I. (2005). Negotiating silence and speech in the classroom. Multilingua, 24, 75–100.Google Scholar
  42. Newman, D. R., Johnson, C., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1997). Evaluating the quality of learning in computer-supported co-coperative learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science (1986–1998), 48(6), 484–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Norton, B. (1997). Language, identity, and the ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 409–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pennycook, A. (1999). Introduction: Critical approaches to TESOL [Speical issue]. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 329–348.Google Scholar
  45. Phillips, S. (1972). Participant structures and communicative competence: Warm Springs children in community and classroom. In B. C. Courtney, P. J. Vera, & D. Hymes (Eds.), Functions of language in the classroom (pp. 370–394). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  46. Remedios, L., Clarke, D., & Hawthorne, L. (2009). The silent participant in small group collaborative learning contexts. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rowe, M. B. (1974). Pausing phenomena: Influence on the quality of instruction. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 3, 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). Simplest systematics for organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sajavaara, K., & Lehtonen, J. (1997). The silent Finn revisited. In A. Jaworski (Ed.), Silence: Interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 263–283). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  50. Saville-Troike, M. (1985). The place of silence in an integrated theory of communication. In D. Tannen & M. Saville-Trioke (Eds.), Perspectives on silence (pp. 3–18). Norwook, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  51. Sturman, A. (Ed.). (1997). Case study methods. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  52. Tang, P. (2007). A profile of new full-time undergraduate students 2006–2007. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  53. Van der Linden, J., Erkens, G., Schmidt, H. G., & Renshaw, P. (2000). Collaborative learning. In R. J. Simons, J. Van der Linden, & T. Duffy (Eds.), New learning (pp. 37–54). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  54. Visschers-Pleijers, A. J. S. F., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., De Grave, W. S., Wolfhagen, H. A. P., Jacobs, J. A., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2006). Student perceptions about the characteristics of an effective discussion during the reporting phase in problem-based learning. Medical Education, 40(9), 924–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Visschers-Pleijers, A. J. S. F., Dolmans, D., de Leng, B., Wolfhagen, I., & van der Vleuten, C. (2006). Analysis of verbal interactions in tutorial groups: A process study. Medical Teacher, 40(2), 129–137.Google Scholar
  56. Vye, N. J., Goldman, S. R., Voss, J. F., Hmelo, C., & Williams, S. (1997). Complex math problem-solving by individuals and dyads: When and why are two heads better than one? Cognition and Instruction, 15, 435–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practices: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Wilkerson, L., Hafler, J. P., & Liu, P. A. (1991). A case study of student-directed discussion in four problem-based tutorial groups. Academic Medicine, 66(9), 79–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Winning, T., & Townsend, G. (2007). Problem-based learning in dental education: What’s the evidence for and against… and is it worth the effort? Australian Dental Journal, 52(1), 2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wong, J. K. (2004). Are learning styles of Asian international students culturally or contextually based? International Education Journal, 4, 154–166.Google Scholar
  62. Woodward-Kron, R., & Remedios, L. (2007). Classroom discourse in problem-based learning classrooms in the health science. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 30(1), 9.1–9.18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhou, Y. R., Knoke, D., & Sakamoto, I. (2005). Rethinking silence in the classroom: Chinese students’ experiences of sharing indigenous knowledge. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 9(3), 287–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jun Jin
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of Hong KongPokfulamHong Kong

Personalised recommendations