Abstract
The advanced integrative scientific convergence (AISC) model represents a viable approach to neuroscience. Beyond simple multi-disciplinarity, the AISC model unifies constituent scientific and technological fields to foster innovation, invention and new ways of addressing seemingly intractable questions. In this way, AISC can yield novel methods and foster new trajectories of knowledge and discovery, and yield new epistemologies. As stand-alone disciplines, each and all of the constituent fields generate practical and ethical issues, and their convergence may establish a unique set of both potential benefits and problems. To effectively attend to these contingencies requires pragmatic assessment of the actual capabilities and limits of neurofocal AISC, and an openness to what new knowledge and scientific/technological achievements may be produced, and how such outcomes can affect humanity, the human condition, society and the global environment. It is proposed that a progressive neurobioethics may be needed to establish both a meta-ethical framework upon which to structure ethical decisions, and a system and method of ethics that is inclusive, convergent and innovative, and in thus aligned with and meaningful to use of an AISC model in neuroscience.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Simonton DK (2004) Creativity in science: chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Valenstein ES (2005) The war of the soups and sparks. Columbia University Press, New York
Giordano J (2011) Stud Ethics Law Technol 5(1):1–9
Giordano J, Boswell MV, Benedikter R (2010) J Ethics Biol Eng Med 1(2):135–142
Lenk H (1963) Technokratie als Ideologie. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart
Giordano J, DuRousseau D (2011) J Cog Technol 15(2):5–10
Cole S (1983) J Sociol 84:958–977
Brannigan A, Wanner RA (1983) Can J Sociol 8:135–151
Giordano J, Olds J (2010) Am J Bioeth Neurosci 1(4):12–14
Drexler KE (1998) Nanosystems: molecular machinery, manufacturing and computation. Wiley, Baltimore
Gabriel G, Gomez R, Bongard M, Benito N, Fernandez E, Villa R (2009) Biosens Bioelectron 4:1942–1948
Giordano J, Akhouri R, McBride DK (2009) J Long Term Eff Med Implants 5(9):45–54
Grunwald A (2005) Sci Eng Ethics 11(2):187–201
Hester RE, Harrison RM (2007) Nanotechnology: consequences for human health and the environment, vol 24, Issues in environmental science and technology. Royal Society of Chemistry Publishing, London
FitzGerald K, Wurzman R (2010) In: Giordano J, Gordijn B (eds) Scientific and philosophical perspectives in neuroethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Williams RB, Marchuk DA, Gadde KM et al (2003) Neuropsychopharmacology 28:533–541
Harper PS, Clarke A (1990) Lancet 335:1205–1206
Plomin R, McGuffin P (2003) Annu Rev Psychol 54:205–228
Giordano J, Wurzman R (2008) Depress Mind Body 4(1):2–5
Walters LR (1986) Nature 320:225–227
Kitcher P (1996) The lives to come: the genetic revolution and human possibilities. Simon and Schuster, New York
Annas G (1993) JAMA 270:2346–2350
Parens E (2004) Hastings Cent Rep 34(suppl1):S1–36
Burris S, Gostin LO (2004) In: Burley J, Harris J (eds) A companion to genethics. Blackwell, London
Wolf S (1995) J Med Ethics 23:345–349
von Neumann J (1958) The computer and the brain. Yale University Press, New Haven
McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943) Bull Math Biophys 5:115–133
Gigerenzer G, Goldstein DG (1996) Creat Res J 9(2/3):131–144
Culham JC (2006) In: Cabeza R, Kingstone A (eds) Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Birbaumer N, Cohen LG (2007) J Physiol 579:621–636
Hinterberger T, Widmann G, Lal TN et al (2008) Epilepsy Behav 13:300–306
Rosenthal A et al (2010) J Biomed Inform 43(2):342–353
Smith K et al (2004) NeuroImage 22(4):1646–1656
Hassan U et al (2008) NeuroImage 39(2):693–706
Vaseashta A (2012) Technological innovations in sensing and detection of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear threats and ecological terrorism. Springer, Dordrecht
Giordano J (2010) Synesis 1(1):2–4
Giordano J (2011) Hum Prospect 1(1):2–6
Racine E (2010) Pragmatic neuroethics. MIT Press, Cambridge
Roskies A (2002) Neuron 35:21–23
Giordano J (2010) In: Giordano J, Gordijn B (eds) Scientific and philosophical perspectives in neuroethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Giordano J (2011) AJOB Neurosci 3(2):9–13
Benedikter R, Giordano J, FitzGerald K (2010) J Futures 42(10):1102–1109
Levy N (2001) AJOB Neurosci 3(2):1–7
Aristotle (1966) Nicomachean ethics (trans: Ross D). Oxford University Press, London
Giordano J (2009) Pain: mind, meaning and medicine. PPM Press, Glen Falls
Acknowledgements
This work was supported, in part by funding from NATO, grants from the Office of Naval Research and the Nour Foundation; the IGERT Program of the University of New Mexico, the William H. and Ruth Crane Schaefer Endowment, and ongoing subsidies provided by the Center for Neurotechnology Studies of the Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, USA. Thanks to Prof. A. Vaseashta PhD for continued collaboration in studies of integrative scientific convergence, and to Sherry Loveless for editorial assistance and graphic artistry.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Giordano, J. (2012). Integrative Convergence in Neuroscience: Trajectories, Problems, and the Need for a Progressive Neurobioethics. In: Vaseashta, A., Braman, E., Susmann, P. (eds) Technological Innovations in Sensing and Detection of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear Threats and Ecological Terrorism. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2488-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2488-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2487-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2488-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)