Skip to main content

Integrative Convergence in Neuroscience: Trajectories, Problems, and the Need for a Progressive Neurobioethics

Convergence in Neuroscience – The Need for Neurobioethics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Technological Innovations in Sensing and Detection of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear Threats and Ecological Terrorism

Abstract

The advanced integrative scientific convergence (AISC) model represents a viable approach to neuroscience. Beyond simple multi-disciplinarity, the AISC model unifies constituent scientific and technological fields to foster innovation, invention and new ways of addressing seemingly intractable questions. In this way, AISC can yield novel methods and foster new trajectories of knowledge and discovery, and yield new epistemologies. As stand-alone disciplines, each and all of the constituent fields generate practical and ethical issues, and their convergence may establish a unique set of both potential benefits and problems. To effectively attend to these contingencies requires pragmatic assessment of the actual capabilities and limits of neurofocal AISC, and an openness to what new knowledge and scientific/technological achievements may be produced, and how such outcomes can affect humanity, the human condition, society and the global environment. It is proposed that a progressive neurobioethics may be needed to establish both a meta-ethical framework upon which to structure ethical decisions, and a system and method of ethics that is inclusive, convergent and innovative, and in thus aligned with and meaningful to use of an AISC model in neuroscience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Simonton DK (2004) Creativity in science: chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  2. Valenstein ES (2005) The war of the soups and sparks. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Giordano J (2011) Stud Ethics Law Technol 5(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  4. Giordano J, Boswell MV, Benedikter R (2010) J Ethics Biol Eng Med 1(2):135–142

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lenk H (1963) Technokratie als Ideologie. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  6. Giordano J, DuRousseau D (2011) J Cog Technol 15(2):5–10

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cole S (1983) J Sociol 84:958–977

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brannigan A, Wanner RA (1983) Can J Sociol 8:135–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Giordano J, Olds J (2010) Am J Bioeth Neurosci 1(4):12–14

    Google Scholar 

  10. Drexler KE (1998) Nanosystems: molecular machinery, manufacturing and computation. Wiley, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gabriel G, Gomez R, Bongard M, Benito N, Fernandez E, Villa R (2009) Biosens Bioelectron 4:1942–1948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Giordano J, Akhouri R, McBride DK (2009) J Long Term Eff Med Implants 5(9):45–54

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grunwald A (2005) Sci Eng Ethics 11(2):187–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hester RE, Harrison RM (2007) Nanotechnology: consequences for human health and the environment, vol 24, Issues in environmental science and technology. Royal Society of Chemistry Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. FitzGerald K, Wurzman R (2010) In: Giordano J, Gordijn B (eds) Scientific and philosophical perspectives in neuroethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  16. Williams RB, Marchuk DA, Gadde KM et al (2003) Neuropsychopharmacology 28:533–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harper PS, Clarke A (1990) Lancet 335:1205–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Plomin R, McGuffin P (2003) Annu Rev Psychol 54:205–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Giordano J, Wurzman R (2008) Depress Mind Body 4(1):2–5

    Google Scholar 

  20. Walters LR (1986) Nature 320:225–227

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kitcher P (1996) The lives to come: the genetic revolution and human possibilities. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Annas G (1993) JAMA 270:2346–2350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Parens E (2004) Hastings Cent Rep 34(suppl1):S1–36

    Google Scholar 

  24. Burris S, Gostin LO (2004) In: Burley J, Harris J (eds) A companion to genethics. Blackwell, London

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wolf S (1995) J Med Ethics 23:345–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. von Neumann J (1958) The computer and the brain. Yale University Press, New Haven

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943) Bull Math Biophys 5:115–133

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Gigerenzer G, Goldstein DG (1996) Creat Res J 9(2/3):131–144

    Google Scholar 

  29. Culham JC (2006) In: Cabeza R, Kingstone A (eds) Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  30. Birbaumer N, Cohen LG (2007) J Physiol 579:621–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hinterberger T, Widmann G, Lal TN et al (2008) Epilepsy Behav 13:300–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rosenthal A et al (2010) J Biomed Inform 43(2):342–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Smith K et al (2004) NeuroImage 22(4):1646–1656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hassan U et al (2008) NeuroImage 39(2):693–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vaseashta A (2012) Technological innovations in sensing and detection of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear threats and ecological terrorism. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  36. Giordano J (2010) Synesis 1(1):2–4

    Google Scholar 

  37. Giordano J (2011) Hum Prospect 1(1):2–6

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Racine E (2010) Pragmatic neuroethics. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  39. Roskies A (2002) Neuron 35:21–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Giordano J (2010) In: Giordano J, Gordijn B (eds) Scientific and philosophical perspectives in neuroethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Giordano J (2011) AJOB Neurosci 3(2):9–13

    Google Scholar 

  42. Benedikter R, Giordano J, FitzGerald K (2010) J Futures 42(10):1102–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Levy N (2001) AJOB Neurosci 3(2):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  44. Aristotle (1966) Nicomachean ethics (trans: Ross D). Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  45. Giordano J (2009) Pain: mind, meaning and medicine. PPM Press, Glen Falls

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported, in part by funding from NATO, grants from the Office of Naval Research and the Nour Foundation; the IGERT Program of the University of New Mexico, the William H. and Ruth Crane Schaefer Endowment, and ongoing subsidies provided by the Center for Neurotechnology Studies of the Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, USA. Thanks to Prof. A. Vaseashta PhD for continued collaboration in studies of integrative scientific convergence, and to Sherry Loveless for editorial assistance and graphic artistry.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Giordano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Giordano, J. (2012). Integrative Convergence in Neuroscience: Trajectories, Problems, and the Need for a Progressive Neurobioethics. In: Vaseashta, A., Braman, E., Susmann, P. (eds) Technological Innovations in Sensing and Detection of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear Threats and Ecological Terrorism. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2488-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics