Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of a Nature of Science and Science Education Course on Teachers’ Nature of Science Classroom Practices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Nature of Science Research

Abstract

Science education reform documents have for some time emphasized the need for accurate and effective nature of science (NOS) instruction. However, efforts to encourage teachers to consistently and effectively address the NOS have had mixed results. The first author developed a NOS course that promoted and modeled explicit and reflective NOS instruction, emphasizing the importance of incorporating NOS activities along a decontextualized to highly contextualized continuum and extensively scaffolding between those contexts (Clough, 2006). This study determined the quantity and quality of NOS instruction participants implemented during the following semester. Six teachers were observed on three occasions and interviewed afterwards. Their students completed a questionnaire indicating the kind and frequency of NOS instruction they experienced. Structured interviews were conducted with each teacher following the school year. Four of the six teachers consistently implemented NOS when teaching science content, and the remaining two teachers implemented NOS decontextually. While teachers at low levels of implementation cited institutional constraints hindering their efforts, high-level implementation teachers faced the same constraints. High implementation teachers are committed to teaching the NOS, exhibited risk-taking behaviors and a conscious awareness they were “bucking” the system. These teachers valued learning how to integrate NOS instruction within the science content they already teach, rather than adding numerous decontextualized NOS activities to an already overburdened curriculum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument: “Views on science-technology-society” (VOSTS). Science Education, 76(5), 477–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. S., Ryan, A. G., & Fleming, R. W. (1989). Views on science-technology-society, Form CDN.mc.5. Department of Curriculum Studies, College of Education, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK. S7N 0W0, Canada. [WWW Document]. Retrieved August 24, 2011, from http://www.usask.ca/education/people/aikenhead/vosts.pdf

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1997). Developing and acting upon one’s conception of science: The reality of teacher preparation. Paper presented at the 1997 Association for the Education of Teachers in Science (AETS) meeting in Cincinnati, OH. January 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S. G. (1989). History of science and science education. Interchange, 20, 60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruxvoort, C. N., Olson, J. K., Clough, M. P., & Vanderlinden, D. (2003). Assessment of teachers’ understandings of effective nature of science instruction: Teachers’ thinking and implications for research methodology. Paper presented at the 7th International History, Philosophy & Science Teaching (IHPST) Conference, Winnipeg, Canada, July 30–August 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, R. L., & Strauss, N. G. (1970). An analysis of experienced science teachers’ understanding of the nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 70, 366–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cawthron, E. R., & Rowell, J. A. (1978). Epistemology and science. Studies in Science Education, 5, 31–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. P. (1995). Longitudinal understanding of the nature of science as facilitated by an introductory high school biology course. Proceedings of the third international history, philosophy, and science teaching conference (pp. 212–221). University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. P. (1997). Strategies and activities for initiating and maintaining pressure on students’ naive views concerning the nature of science. Interchange, 28(2–3), 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. P. (2004). The nature of science: Understanding how the “game” of science is played. In J. Weld (Ed.), The game of science education (pp. 198–227). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. P. (2006). Learners’ responses to the demands of conceptual change: Considerations for effective nature of science instruction. Science & Education, 15(5), 463–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. P. (2011). The story behind the science: Bringing science and scientists to life in post-secondary science education. Science & Education, 20(7), 701–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. P., Herman, B. C., & Smith, J. A. R. (2010). Seamlessly teaching science content and the nature of science. Paper presented at the Association for Science Teacher Education (ASTE) National Conference, Sacramento, CA, January 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBoer, G. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durant, J. R., Evans, G. A., & Thomas, G. P. (1989). The public understanding of science. Nature, 340, 11–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkana, Y. (1970). Science, philosophy of science and science teaching. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2, 15–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, B. A., & Spargo, P. E. (1989). Ptolemy revisited? The existence of a mild instrumentalism in some selected high school physical science textbooks. Interchange, 20(1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, B. (1991). Beginning teachers’ knowledge of and attitude toward history and philosophy of science. Science Education, 75, 135–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakin, S., & Wellington, J. (1994). Who will teach the ‘nature of science’? Teachers’ views of science and their implications for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 16(2), 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1998). The state of science education: Subject matter without context. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(2), [WWW Document] http://unr.edu/homepage/jcannon/ejse/lederman.html

  • Leite, L. (2002). History of science in science education: Development and validation of a checklist for analysing the historical content of science textbooks. Science & Education, 11(4), 333–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. Science & Education, 7(6), 511–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F., & Olson, J. K. (1998). The nature of science in international standards documents. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyling, H. (1997). How to change students’ conceptions of the epistemology of science. Science & Education, 6(4), 397–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar, R., & Wynne, B. (1988). Public understanding of science: From contents to processes. International Journal of Science Education, 10(4), 388–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, 112(2), 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. D. (1987). Scientific literacy in the United States. In the Ciba Foundation Conference program, Communicating science to the public (pp. 19–40). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. E. (1963). A comparison of the abilities of secondary teachers and students of biology to understand science. Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Sciences, 70, 510–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munby, H. (1976). Some implications of language in science education. Science Education, 60(1), 115–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). (1989). Science objectives. Princeton: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Board. (2002). Science and engineering indicators 2002. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. K., & Clough, M. P. (2003). Opening the black box of nature of science instruction. Paper presented at the 7th International History, Philosophy & Science Teaching (IHPST) Conference, Winnipeg, Canada, July 30–August 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. T. (1968). The nature of science and science teaching. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M. B., & Holland, C. (1990). The uncommon common sense of science. In M. B. Rowe (Ed.), What research says to the science teacher, volume six, The process of knowing (pp. 87–97). Washington: DC: National Science Teachers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, J. A., & Cawthron, E. R. (1982). Image of science: An empirical study. European Journal of Science Education, 4(1), 79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubba, P. A., Horner, J. K., & Smith, J. M. (1981). A study of two misconceptions about the nature of science among junior high school students. School Science and Mathematics, 81(3), 221–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudge, D. W. (2000). Does being wrong make Kettlewell wrong for science teaching? Journal of Biological Education, 35(1), 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. G., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1992). Students’ preconceptions about the epistemology of science. Science Education, 76(6), 559–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, D. J. (1967). Test on understanding science: A comparison among several groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5, 365–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative resarch (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S. (1990). They’re not dumb, they’re different: Stalking the second tier. Tucson: Research Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziman, J. (1991). Public understanding of science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16(1), 99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Excellence in Science, Mathematics and Engineering Education, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA

    Michael P. Clough & Joanne K. Olson

Authors
  1. Michael P. Clough
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joanne K. Olson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael P. Clough .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Bahrain Teachers College, Manama, Bahrain

    Myint Swe Khine

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clough, M.P., Olson, J.K. (2012). Impact of a Nature of Science and Science Education Course on Teachers’ Nature of Science Classroom Practices. In: Khine, M. (eds) Advances in Nature of Science Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2457-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation