Abstract
Although most accounts on causality discuss the specific role statistics and theory should have, it is taken for granted that they at least have a role in finding causal structures. The role for mathematics is not so obvious. However, before what is called the Probabilistic Revolution in econometrics, identification of causal relations was not a matter of economic-theoretical and statistical significance alone. Mathematical molding was considered as an essential tool in finding significant causal factors. In the 1940s, mathematical molding disappeared in the changeover from methods to specify causal mechanisms of business cycles to methods to identify economic structures, that is, invariant relationships underlying the workings of an economy. Mathematical molding could fulfill its role in modeling business cycle mechanisms because of the assumed close connection between mathematical representations of the business-cycle phenomenon and those of the explanatory mechanism. When the econometric program shifted its focus from mechanisms explaining phenomena to uncovering structural relationships, direct feedback from the phenomenon to the mechanism was lost and the role of mathematical molding ceased to exist.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See, for example, the opening sentence of Aldrich’s (1989) paper on Autonomy: “Knowledge of structure is valuable and available – but only to those prepared to use both economic theory and statistical analysis.”
- 2.
This explains the name “quadrature theory.” Quadrature stands for the process of determining the area of a plane geometric figure by dividing it into a collection of shapes of known area (usually rectangles) and then finding the sum of these areas. The integral denotes this process for infinitesimal rectangles.
- 3.
Translated by the author.
- 4.
- 5.
Boumans (1995), which discusses the more technical details of Frisch’s memorandum, also provides the derivation of this rule.
- 6.
In Boumans (2005), it is shown that Haavelmo’s definitions of potential and factual influences can be represented in this way.
- 7.
Both monographs are considered as containing the main body of the Cowles Commission’s theoretical results (see Christ 1994, p. 32).
- 8.
For a more sophisticated account of this convergence, see Chao (2009), where he distinguishes between the invariance view and the theory view. Autonomy is equivalent to invariance but “does not say anything about the constitution of a system” (p. 71). So, the convergence is best described as the “invariance view of structure.”
References
Aftalion, Albert. 1927. The theory of economic cycles based on the capitalistic technique of production. Review of Economic Statistics 9(4): 165–170.
Aldrich, John. 1989. Autonomy. In History and methodology of econometrics, ed. N. de Marchi and C. Gilbert, 15–34. Oxford: Clarendon.
Aldrich, John. 1994. Haavelmo’s identification theory. Econometric Theory 10: 198–219.
Boumans, Marcel. 1995. Frisch on testing of business cycle theories. Journal of Econometrics 67(1): 129–147.
Boumans, Marcel. 1999. Built-in justification. In Models as mediators, ed. M.S. Morgan and M. Morrison, 66–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boumans, Marcel. 2005. How economists model the world into numbers. London/New York: Routledge.
Bullock, Charles J., Warren M. Persons, and William L. Crum. 1927. The construction and interpretation of the Harvard index of business conditions. Review of Economic Statistics 9(2): 74–92.
Chao, Hsiang-Ke. 2009. Representation and structure in economics: The methodology of econometric models of the consumption function. London/New York: Routledge.
Christ, Carl F. 1994. The Cowles Commission’s contributions to econometrics at Chicago, 1939–1955. Journal of Economic Literature 32(1): 30–59.
Frisch, Ragnar. 1933a. Editorial. Econometrica 1: 1–4.
Frisch, Ragnar. 1933b. Propagation problems and impulse problems in dynamic economics. In Economic essays in honour of Gustav Cassel, 171–205. London: Allen & Unwin.
Frisch, Ragnar. 1948. Repercussion studies at Oslo. The American Economic Review 38(3): 367–372.
Frisch, Ragnar. 1995. Statistical versus theoretical relations in economic macrodynamics. In The foundations of econometric analysis, ed. D. Hendry and M.S. Morgan, 407–419. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Girshick, M.A., and Trygve Haavelmo. 1953. Statistical analysis of the demand for food: Examples of simultaneous estimation of structural equations. In Studies in econometric method, Cowles commission monograph 14, ed. W.C. Hood and T.C. Koopmans, 92–111. New York: Wiley. First published in 1947 in Econometrica 15.2: 79–110.
Haavelmo, Trygve. 1940. The inadequacy of testing dynamic theory by comparing theoretical solutions and observed cycles. Econometrica 8: 312–321.
Haavelmo, Trygve. 1944. The probability approach in econometrics. Supplement to Econometrica 12: 1–115.
Haavelmo, Trygve. 1950. Remarks on Frisch’s confluence analysis and its use in econometrics. In Statistical inference in dynamic economic models, Cowles commission monograph 10, ed. T.C. Koopmans, 258–265. New York: Wiley.
Hanau, Arthur. 1928. Die Prognose der Schweinepreise, Vierteljahrshefte zur Konjunkturforschung, Sonderheft Berlin: Institut für Konjunkturforschung 7.
Hendry, David F., and Mary S. Morgan (eds.). 1995. The foundations of econometric analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoover, Kevin D. 1994. Econometrics as observation: The Lucas critique and the nature of econometric inference. Journal of Economic Methodology 1(1): 65–80.
Kalecki, Michal. 1935. A macrodynamic theory of business cycles. Econometrica 3: 327–344.
Karsten, Karl G. 1924. The theory of quadrature in economics. Journal of the American Statistical Association 19: 14–27.
Karsten, K.G. 1926. The Harvard business indexes – A new interpretation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 21: 399–418.
Keynes, John Maynard. 1939. Professor Tinbergen’s method. The Economic Journal 49(195): 558–568.
Koopmans, Tjalling C., Herman Rubin, and Roy B. Leipnik. 1950. Measuring the equation systems of dynamic economics. In Statistical inference in dynamic economic models, Cowles commission monograph 10, ed. T.C. Koopmans, 53–237. New York: Wiley.
Magnus, Jan R., and Mary S. Morgan. 1987. The ET interview: Professor J. Tinbergen. Econometric Theory 3: 117–142.
Marschak, Jacob. 1934. The meeting of the econometric society in Leyden, September–October, 1933. Econometrica 2: 187–203.
Morgan, Mary S. 1990. The history of econometric ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tinbergen, Jan. 1927. Over de Mathematies-Statistiese Methoden voor Konjunktuuronderzoek. De Economist 11: 711–723.
Tinbergen, Jan. 1928. Opmerkingen over Ruilteorie. Socialistische Gids 13(5): 431–445, 13.6: 539–548.
Tinbergen, Jan. 1931. Ein Schiffbauzyklus? Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 34(2): 152–164.
Tinbergen, Jan. 1933a. L’Utilisation des Équations Fonctionnelles et des Nombres Complexes Dans les Recherches Économiques. Econometrica 1: 36–51.
Tinbergen, Jan. 1933b. Statistiek en Wiskunde in Dienst van het Konjunktuuronderzoek. Amsterdam: Arbeiderspers.
Tinbergen, Jan. 1935. Annual survey: Suggestions on quantitative business cycle theory. Econometrica 3(3): 241–308.
Tinbergen, Jan. 1939a. Statistical testing of business-cycle theories I; a method and its application to investment activity. Geneva: League of Nations.
Tinbergen, Jan. 1939b. Statistical testing of business-cycle theories II; business cycles in the United States of America. Geneva: League of Nations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boumans, M. (2013). The Regrettable Loss of Mathematical Molding in Econometrics. In: Chao, HK., Chen, ST., Millstein, R. (eds) Mechanism and Causality in Biology and Economics. History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2454-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2454-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2453-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2454-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)