Skip to main content

River Hardware and Software: Perspectives on National Interest and Water Governance in the Mekong River Basin

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 760 Accesses

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Geography ((BRIEFSGEOGRAPHY))

Abstract

At a global level, river basin development and management has shifted from a ‘hardware’-driven approach based around engineering river systems in the form of dams, diversions and other large structures, toward a ‘software’-driven approach under the broad rubrics of governance and integrated water resource management. Nevertheless, large-scale water resource development is still being pushed ahead. There is clearly not an ‘either/or’ scenario in terms of hardware and software approaches to river management. This chapter examines the implications of new approaches to river basin governance for the planning and implementation of river engineering structures in a transboundary river setting. The context for the study is the Mekong river basin. The Mekong has achieved prominence among the world’s more than 260 river basins that cross national boundaries, as a river and a basin that is actively managed across borders. One of the reasons for such prominence is the established institutional basis for cooperation among the four lower countries of the basin and the international support for this governance framework. Another is the longstanding and continuing plans for significant impoundment and diversion of the river and its tributaries. At present, the Mekong is moving toward something of a crisis of transboundary water governance. The Mekong River Commission (MRC) is at the heart of this crisis. At one level, the conundrum is the tension between management of the river for ecological sustainability and social justice, on the one hand, and the drive for development of a relatively under-exploited set of water resources on the other. This tension is exaggerated in a river basin whose population remains economically poor and heavily dependent on the natural resource base for livelihood. At another level, the conundrum is one of scale of governance, and this poses both challenges and opportunities for the MRC as an integrated water resource management agency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In a recent study led by the author, the questions raised in this chapter have been addressed head-on in a policy context. The study is an applied policy study in the sense that it was developed and conducted between DANIDA, the largest donor to MRC since 1995, and the Australian Mekong Resource Centre (AMRC)—which has taken critical civil society concerns on board in its research on the Mekong. The full report and executive summary are available at http://www.mekong.es.usyd.edu.au/projects/mekong_water_governance2.htm.

References

  • Biswas A, Varis O, Tortajada C (2005) Integrated water resources management in South and South-East Asia. Oxford University Press, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatter J, Ingram H (1998) States, markets and beyond: governance of transboundary water resources. Nat Resour J 40(2):439–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesen J, Ravnborg HM (2003) From water wars to water riots: lessons from transboundary water management. Danish Institute for International Studies, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekbladh D (2002) “Mr TVA”: grass-roots development, David Lilienthal, and the rise and fall of the Tennessee valley authority as a symbol for US overseas development, 1933–1973. Dipl Hist 26(3):335–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks T (2004) Water governance—what is the consensus? The water consensus—identifying the gaps. University of Bradford, Bradford

    Google Scholar 

  • He DM, Chen LH (2002) The impact of hydropower cascade development in the Lancang-Mekong Basin, Yunnan. Mekong Update Dialogue 5(3):2–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch P (2001) Globalisation, regionalisation and local voices: the Asian development bank and rescaled politics of environment in the Mekong region. Singap J Trop Geogr 22(3):237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch P, Wyatt A (2004) Negotiating local livelihoods: scales of conflict in the Se San river basin. Asia Pac Viewp 45(1):51–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch P, Jensen KM, Boer B (2006). National interests and transboundary water governance in the Mekong. Australian Mekong Resource Centre, School of Geosciences, University of Sydney in collaboration with Danida

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliot N, Shmueli D, Shamir U (2001) Institutions for management of transboundary water resources: their nature, characteristics and shortcomings. Water Policy 3(3):229–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormack G (2001) Water margins: competing paradigms in China. Criti Asian Stud 33(1):5–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCully P (1996) Silenced rivers: the ecology and politics of large dams. Zed Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Molle F, Wester P, Hirsch P (2006) River basin development and management. Water for food, livelihoods and environment: a comprehensive assessment. Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture, Colombo

    Google Scholar 

  • Pante F (1996) Investing in regional development: the Asian development bank. In: Stensholt B (ed) Developing the Mekong subregion. Monash Asia Institute, Clayton, pp 16–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Plinston D, He DM (1999) Water resources and hydropower. Policies and strategies for the sustainable development of the Lancang river basin. ADB TA-3139. PRC Asian Development Bank, Manila

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah T, Roy AD, Qureshi AS et al (2003) Sustaining Asia’s groundwater boom: an overview of issues and evidence. Nat Resour Forum 27(2):130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiva V (2002) Water wars: privatisation pollution and profit. Pluto Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen M, Wester P, Molle F (2005) Managing river basins: an institutional perspective. In: Svendsen M (ed) Irrigation and river basin management: options for governance and institutions. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 1–18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DE (2005) Developing watershed management organizations in pilot sub-basins of the Ping river basin. Office of natural resources and environmental policy and planning. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf A (1999) Criteria for equitable allocations: the heart of international water conflict. Nat Resour Forum 23(1):3–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Dams (2000) Dams and development: a new framework for decision making. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang G (2004) Global environmentalism hits China. Yale Center for the Study of Globalization, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This chapter is based in part on research carried out with the support of the Australian Research Council and Danish Overseas Development Assistance. Please note that the original manuscript was produced in 2006.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Hirsch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hirsch, P. (2012). River Hardware and Software: Perspectives on National Interest and Water Governance in the Mekong River Basin. In: Higgitt, D. (eds) Perspectives on Environmental Management and Technology in Asian River Basins. SpringerBriefs in Geography. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2330-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics