Skip to main content

The Effect of Tourism on the Housing Market

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Tourism and Quality-of-Life Research

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to examine the way theoretical and empirical literature has looked at the effect of tourism on housing markets in resort destinations. We note that while research on tourism recognizes the effects of recreation activities on local land and housing markets, studies focusing specifically on this issue are very limited. For the purposes of the present work, we first identify the various actors/participants in housing markets and explain how they interact in the context of tourism destinations. Then, we focus on two core strands of relevant research: first, we examine the hedonic price method, as a mechanism to explore how tourism-related amenities can be “quantified” and developed into one of the variables that affect directly and indirectly (through quality-of-life considerations) house price formation in tourism destinations. In the same context, with the use of a case study, we also review an alternative way to quantify the effects of tourism, through the creation of a composite tourism index that enters directly into the house price estimation function. Second, we look at the growing literature on holiday homes and examine how demand for this type of accommodation in tourism destinations can affect the functioning of local housing markets. In this context, we examine issues of housing affordability in tourism destinations, the role of the supply side, but also the policy challenges and responses, suggested in the relevant literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In equilibrium, the willingness to pay and the willingness to accept compensation are equal to the implicit price of each characteristic.

  2. 2.

    In the nonparametric approach, no functional relationship is assumed between the dependent variable (housing price) and the independent variables (structural, environmental, and qualitative characteristics). For a more thorough discussion of nonparametric or semi-parametric approaches see Sheppard (1999).

  3. 3.

    In some cases more flexible functional forms are used such as, for instance, the Box-Cox transformation- Linneman (1980), Halvorsen and Pollakowsky (1981). In case of Box-Cox transformation the maximum likelihood estimator is preferred, see again Sheppard (1999) and Cheshire and Sheppard (1998).

  4. 4.

     Tourism has been extensively approached as a heterogeneous good in the Lancastrian sense (Rugg 1973; Morley 1992; Papatheodorou 2001; Seddighi and Theocharous 2002). The empirical research in tourism uses HPM to investigate two main topics: to analyze the impact on the final price of characteristics of packages holidays (Sinclair et al. 1990; Clewer et al. 1992; Taylor 1995; Papatheodorou 2001; Mangion et al. 2005; Thrane 2005); and to investigate the implicit price of amenities either on the price of tourism accommodation (hotels, holiday cottages, apartments, guesthouse), or on the house prices in resort locations.

  5. 5.

    See Le Goffe (2000) for the case of self catering cottages in Brittany, Vanslembrouck et al. (2005) for rural cottages in Flanders (Belgium), Fleischer and Tchetchick (2005) for rural cottages in Israel.

  6. 6.

     On the contrary, Mollard et al. (2007) in a study based on the 1,529 rents of cottages (weekly rate in peak season) in southern France in 2002 find that forestland has a positive effect on rents.

  7. 7.

    Smith and Palmquist (1994) focus on the willingness to pay for coastal amenities in different tourist seasons (peak, pre-peak, and post peak) and how this affects weekly rents of holiday cottages and apartments supplied by property management firms.

  8. 8.

    See Lambiri et al. (2007) for an extensive review of hedonic studies looking at the effects of QOL considerations on house prices.

  9. 9.

    They quote the work of Wilman and Krutilla (1980) as one of the first study that uses HPM to analyze beach quality and property values.

  10. 10.

    Sardinia is the second main island of Italy with a surface of 24,089 square km. (7.9% of the national surface) and a coastline of 1,731 km. Its population was 1,651,888 in 1999 (2.8% of the Italian population). Fifty percent of the population lives in the province of Cagliari (located in the South), in which is located also the Capital of the Region. Sardinia relies upon five ports (Arbatax, Cagliari, Golfo Aranci, and Olbia) and three airports (Alghero, Cagliari, and Olbia). The tourism industry in Sardinia starts developing in the 1960s thanks to the presence of high quality marine amenities. Since the beginning, the northern part of the region has been the strongest attraction pole for tourists (particularly the town of Alghero and the so called Costa Smeralda close to the town of Olbia). Nowadays, 50% of tourist demand and 50% of all tourist beds are concentrated in the northern part of the island (hotels, camp sites, and tourist villages).

  11. 11.

    For alternative ways of standardizing scores, see Blom (1958) and Tukey (1962).

  12. 12.

    The role of Alghero as a top tourist destination is well known in Italy. In the 1950s, Alghero was also selected as the location of the first tourist association of Sardinia and the first Local Tourist Institution (Biagi and Contu 2002). Alghero has been also the first area in the Island to be promoted by an international tour operator in 1954: the Horizon Holidays.

  13. 13.

    The two indexes show a significant degree of correlation: the Pearson correlation between the two indexes is 0.509, significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).

  14. 14.

     The data were made available by CRiMM, (Research Center of the Engineering Department of the University of Cagliari, Italy).

  15. 15.

     While it was positive in a standard OLS.

  16. 16.

    BMW stands for Borders with Northern Ireland, Midlands, and the West.

  17. 17.

    Similarly, in the context of the USA, Di et al. (2001) discuss how the share of second homes in the total housing stock of individual US counties results in differential impacts upon various housing markets.

  18. 18.

    In such cases, Paris notes that “there is a clear causal relationship between the growth of second home ownership and problems of affordability for lower-income households and first-time buyers.”

References

  • Belsky, E. S., Di, Z. X., & McCue, D. (2006). Multiple-home ownership and the income elasticity of housing demand. Joint Center for Housing Studies, Paper W06–5, Harvard University, Cambridge, October 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biagi, B., & Contu, G. (2002). La domanda e l’offerta turistica in Sardegna. In S. Usai & R. Paci (Eds.), L’Ultima Spiaggia, Turismo, Economia e Sostenibilità Ambientale in Sardegna. Cagliari: CRENoS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biagi, B., & Faggian, A. (2004). The effect of tourism on the house market: The case of Sardinia. ERSA Annual Conference, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, G. (1958). Statistical estimates and transformed beta variables. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, A. (1991). The economics of travel and tourism. South Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. W. (1980). The concept of a tourist area life cycle of evolution. Canadian Geographer, 24(1), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Can, A. (1992). Specification and estimation of hedonic housing price models. Regional Sciences and Urban Economics, 22(3), 453–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casado-Diaz, M. A. (1999). Socio-demographic impacts of residential tourism: A case study of Torrevieja, Spain. International Journal of Tourism Research, 1(4), 223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire, P., & Sheppard, S. (1995). On the price of land and the value of amenities. Economica, 62(2), 247–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire, P., & Sheppard, S. (1998). Estimating the demand for housing, land and neighbourhood characteristics. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 60(3), 357–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clewer, A., Pack, A., & Sinclair, M. T. (1992). Price competitiveness and inclusive tour holidays in European cities. In P. Jonson & B. Thomas (Eds.), Choice and demand in tourism (pp. 123–144). London: Mansell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, S. J., & Milosch, J. L. (2009). An estimation of the coastal premium for residential housing prices in San Diego county. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics. doi:10. 1007/s11146-009-9195-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppock, J. T. (1977). Second homes in perspective. In J. T. Coppock (Ed.), Second homes, curse or blessing? (pp. 1–15). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Court, A. T. (1939). The dynamics of automobile demand (pp. 98–119). New York: General Motors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di, Z. X., Mc Ardle, N., & Masnick, G. S. (2001). Second homes: What, how many, where and who. Joint Centre for Housing Studies, Paper N01–2, Harvard University, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinet, J. M., Saez, M., Coenders, G., & Fluvià, M. (2003). Effect on prices of the attributes of holiday hotels: A hedonic prices approach. Tourism Economics, 9(2), 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitz Gerald, J. (2005). The Irish housing stock: growth in number of vacant dwellings. Quarterly Economic Commentary: Special Article, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) 2005(1-Spring).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitz Gerald, J., McCarthy, C., Morgenroth, E., & O’Connell, P. (Eds.). (2003). Mid-term evaluation of the National Development Plan and Community Support Framework for Ireland 2000 to 2006 (Policy Research Series, 50). Dublin: The Economic and Social Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer, A., & Tchetchik, A. (2005). Does rural tourism benefit from agriculture? Tourism Management, 26(4), 493–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallent, N., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2001). Second homes and the UK planning system. Planning Practice and Research, 16(1), 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, A. (2000). From growth machine to growth management: The dynamics of resort development in Whistler, British Columbia. Environment and Planning A, 32(6), 1083–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L., Kolko, J., & Saiz, A. (2000). Consumer city (Discussion Paper 1901). Cambridge: Harvard Institute of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotham, K. F. (2005). Tourism gentrification: The case of New Orleans’ Vieux Carre (French Quarter). Urban Studies, 42(7), 1099–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1961). Hedonic price indexes for automobiles: An econometric analysis of quality change. In The price statistics of the Federal Government (pp. 173–196). New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1971). Price indexes and quality change: Studies in new methods of measurement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, P. (2002). Tourism and seasonal retirement migration. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(4), 899–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen, R., & Pollakowsky, H. O. (1981). Choice of functional form for hedonic price equations. Journal of Urban Economics, 10(1), 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. M. (2007). Coastal landscape and the hedonic price of accommodation. Ecological Economics, 62(3–4), 594–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hettinger, W. (2005). Living and working in paradise: Why housing is too expensive and why communities can do about it. Windham: Thames River Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, M. A. (2001). Investing in international real estate. Westport: Quarum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT (1991). Censimento generale della popolazione e abitazioni, Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT (2001). Statistiche del Turismo, Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute Tagliacarne (1994). CIDEL, Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute Tagliacarne (1999). CIDEL, Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute Tagliacarne (2001). CIDEL, Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L., & Rosen, K. T. (1987). The Interjurisdictional effects of growth controls on housing prices. Journal of Law and Economics, 30(1), 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambiri, D., Biagi, B., & Royuela, V. (2007). Quality of life in the economic and urban economic literature. Social Indicators Research, 84(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Goffe, P. (2000). Hedonic pricing of agriculture and forestry externalities. Environmental and Resource Economics, 15(4), 397–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, K., & Johnson, R. L. (1997). The economic values of tourism’s social impacts. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(1), 90–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linneman, P. (1980). Some empirical results on the nature of hedonic price function for the urban house market. Journal of Urban Economics, 8(1), 47–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magalhaes, C. S. (2001). International property consultants and the transformation of local markets. Journal of Property Research, 18(1), 99–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangion, M. L., Durbarry, R., & Sinclair, M. T. (2005). Tourism competitiveness: Price and quality. Tourism Economics, 11(1), 45–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marjavaara, R., & Müller, D. K. (2007). The development of second homes’ assessed property values in Sweden 1991–2001. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 7(3), 202–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihaljek, D. (2005). Free movement of capital, the real estate market and tourism. In K. Ott (Ed.), Croatian accession to the European Union (Vol. 3). Zagreb: Institute of Public Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milon, J. W., Gressel, J., & Mulkey, D. (1984). Hedonic amenity valuation and functional form specification. Land Economics, 60(4), 378–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollard, A., Rambonilaza, T., & Vollet, D. (2007). Environmental amenities and territorial anchorage in the recreational housing rental market: A hedonic approach with French data. Land Use Policy, 24(2), 484–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, C. L. (1992). A microeconomic theory of international tourism demand. Annals of Tourism Research, 19(2), 250–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, D. K. (2002). Reinventing the countryside: German second-home owners in southern Sweden. Current Issues in Tourism, 5(5), 426–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, D. K., Hall, C. M., & Keen, D. (2004). Second home tourism impact, planning and management. In C. M. Hall & D. K. Muller (Eds.), Tourism mobility and second homes: Between elite landscape and common ground. Clevedon: Channel View Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, B., Yin, L., Kim, Y., & Alexandrescu, F. (2008). The dynamics of land development in resort communities: A multiagent simulation of growth regimes and housing choice. Environment and Planning A, 40(7), 1728–1743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. E. (1985). Tourism: A community approach. New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. P. (2009). Valuing rural recreation amenities: Hedonic prices for vacation rental houses at Deep Creek Lake, Maryland. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 39(3), 485–504. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1392402

  • Nelson, A. C., Pendall, R., Dawkins, C. J., & Knapp, G. J. (2002). The link between growth management and housing affordability: The academic evidence. A discussion paper prepared for The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, M., & Winston, N. (2009). Rising second home numbers in rural Ireland: Distribution, drivers and implications. European Planning Studies, 17(9), 1303–1322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, A., & Mathel, V. (2010). Causes and consequences of underutilized capacity in a tourist resort development. Tourism Management. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2009.12.001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papatheodorou, A. (2001). Why people travel to different places. Annals of Tourism Research, 28(1), 164–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, C. (2009). Re-positioning second homes within housing studies: Household investment, gentrification, multiple residence, mobility and hyperconsumption. Housing, Theory and Society, 26(4), 292–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. (1989). Tourist development. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendall, R. (2000). Local land use regulation and the chain of exclusion. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(2), 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pompe, J. J., & Rinehart, J. R. (1995). Beach quality and the enhancement of recreational property values. Journal of Leisure Research, 27(2), 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A. W. (1977). Second homes in England and Wales: A spatial view. In J. T. Coppock (Ed.), Second homes: Curse or blessing? Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit market: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugg, D. (1973). The choice of journey destination: A theoretical and empirical analysis. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 55(1), 64–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rush, R., & Bruggink, T. H. (2000). The value of ocean proximity on barrier island houses. The Appraisal Journal, LXVII(2), 142–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, C. (1991). Recreational tourism: A social science perspective. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sautter, E. T., & Leisen, B. (1999). Managing stakeholders: A tourism planning model. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(2), 312–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seddighi, H. R., & Theocharous, A. L. (2002). A model of tourism destination choice: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Tourism Management, 23(5), 475–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, S. (1999). Hedonic analysis of housing market. In E. S. Mills & P. C. Cheshire (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 3). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shucksmith, M. (1983). Second homes: A framework for policy. Town Planning Review, 54(2), 174–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, T., Clewer, A., & Pack, A. (1990). Hedonic prices and the marketing of package holidays: The case of tourism resorts in Malaga. In G. J. Ashworth & B. Godall (Eds.), Marketing tourism places. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. K., & Palmquist, R. B. (1994). Temporal substitution and the recreational value of coastal amenities. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(1), 119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. (1995). Measuring changes in the relative competitiveness of package tour destinations. Tourism Economics, 1(2), 169–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L., & Smith, K. (2000). Environmental amenities as a source of market power. Land Economics, 76(4), 550–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrane, C. (2005). Hedonic price models and sun-and-beach package tours: The Norwegian case. Journal of Travel Research, 43(3), 302–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J. W. (1962). The future of data analysis. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33, 1–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanslembrouck, I., Van Huylenbroeck, G., & Van Meensel, J. (2005). Impact of agriculture on rural tourism: A hedonic pricing approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56(1), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venturoni, L., Long, P., & Perdue R. (2005). The economic and social impacts of second homes in four mountain resort counties of Colorado. Paper presented at the 2005 annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Denver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, F. V. (1929). Quality as determinant of vegetable prices. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. M., King, R., & Warnes, T. (1997). A place in the sun: International retirement migration from northern to southern Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 4(2), 115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. M., King, R., Warnes, T., & Patterson, G. (2000). Tourism and international retirement migration: New forms of an old relationship in southern Europe. Tourism Geographies, 2(1), 28–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilman, E. A., & Krutilla, J. V. (1980). Hedonic prices and beach recreational values. Draft to U. S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bianca Biagi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Biagi, B., Lambiri, D., Faggian, A. (2012). The Effect of Tourism on the Housing Market. In: Uysal, M., Perdue, R., Sirgy, M. (eds) Handbook of Tourism and Quality-of-Life Research. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2288-0_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics