Abstract
The remarkable skill with which children intuitiviely use spoken language demonstrates that knowledge of semantics is not a necessary condition for fluently speaking a language. However, the sensible and responsible use of language in a science such as medicine requires more than intuitive linguistic behavior. The application of terms, especially of disease terms to patients in diagnoses such as “Elroy Fox has angina pectoris”, often has many serious consequences. In light of this, one ought to be well acquainted with the syntax and semantics of one’s terms, so that one may choose the ‘ right words’ in communicating one’s observations and experiences. Maybe Elroy Fox does not have angina pectoris, but pneumonia? How will one differentiate between a situation where one term is appropriate and the other not, and another where the reverse is true? Technical problems of this type amount to asking the semantic question: “What does the term such-and-such mean? ”, or equivalently, “how is the term such-and-such defined in medicine? ”.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bourbaki N. The architecture of mathematics. American Mathematical Monthly 1950; 57:231–232.
Bridgman, PW. The Logic of Modern Physics. New York: Macmillan, 1927.
Bridgman, PW. The Nature of Physical Theory. New York: Dover Publications, 1936.
Carnap R. Testability and meaning. Philosophy of Science 1936; 3:419–471 and 1937; 4:1–40.
Carnap R. Meaning and Necessity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1947.
Carnap R. Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1962.
Gödel K. Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia mathematica und verwandter Systeme I. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 1931; 38:173–198. (English translation in [van Heijenoort, 1971], pp. 596–616.)
Hempel CG. Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1952.
Hempel CG. A logical appraisal of operationism. Scientific Monthly 1954; 79:215–220. Reprinted in [Hempel 1965], pp. 123–133.
Leibniz GW. Discourse on Metaphysics and the Monadology. Translated by George R. Montgomery. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 2006.
Rogers H, Jr. Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987.
Russell, Bertrand. Principles of Mathematics. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1903.
Sadegh-Zadeh K. The Fuzzy Revolution: Goodbye to the Aristotelean Weltanschauung. Artif Intell Med 2001; 21:1–25.
Stegmüller W. Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie. Band II: Theorie und Erfahrung. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1970.
Suppes P. Introduction to Logic. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1957.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sadegh-Zadeh, K. (2012). Fundamentals of Medical Concept Formation. In: Handbook of Analytic Philosophy of Medicine. Philosophy and Medicine(), vol 113. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2260-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2260-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2259-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2260-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)