Skip to main content

Fundamentals of Medical Concept Formation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Analytic Philosophy of Medicine

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 113))

  • 942 Accesses

Abstract

The remarkable skill with which children intuitiviely use spoken language demonstrates that knowledge of semantics is not a necessary condition for fluently speaking a language. However, the sensible and responsible use of language in a science such as medicine requires more than intuitive linguistic behavior. The application of terms, especially of disease terms to patients in diagnoses such as “Elroy Fox has angina pectoris”, often has many serious consequences. In light of this, one ought to be well acquainted with the syntax and semantics of one’s terms, so that one may choose the ‘ right words’ in communicating one’s observations and experiences. Maybe Elroy Fox does not have angina pectoris, but pneumonia? How will one differentiate between a situation where one term is appropriate and the other not, and another where the reverse is true? Technical problems of this type amount to asking the semantic question: “What does the term such-and-such mean? ”, or equivalently, “how is the term such-and-such defined in medicine? ”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 499.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bourbaki N. The architecture of mathematics. American Mathematical Monthly 1950; 57:231–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bridgman, PW. The Logic of Modern Physics. New York: Macmillan, 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bridgman, PW. The Nature of Physical Theory. New York: Dover Publications, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carnap R. Testability and meaning. Philosophy of Science 1936; 3:419–471 and 1937; 4:1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carnap R. Meaning and Necessity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carnap R. Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gödel K. Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia mathematica und verwandter Systeme I. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 1931; 38:173–198. (English translation in [van Heijenoort, 1971], pp. 596–616.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hempel CG. Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hempel CG. A logical appraisal of operationism. Scientific Monthly 1954; 79:215–220. Reprinted in [Hempel 1965], pp. 123–133.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leibniz GW. Discourse on Metaphysics and the Monadology. Translated by George R. Montgomery. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rogers H, Jr. Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Russell, Bertrand. Principles of Mathematics. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1903.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sadegh-Zadeh K. The Fuzzy Revolution: Goodbye to the Aristotelean Weltanschauung. Artif Intell Med 2001; 21:1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stegmüller W. Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie. Band II: Theorie und Erfahrung. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Suppes P. Introduction to Logic. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazem Sadegh-Zadeh .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sadegh-Zadeh, K. (2012). Fundamentals of Medical Concept Formation. In: Handbook of Analytic Philosophy of Medicine. Philosophy and Medicine(), vol 113. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2260-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics