Advertisement

Good Enough Parenting?

  • Stefan RamaekersEmail author
  • Judith Suissa
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Philosophies and Theories in Education book series (COPT, volume 4)

Abstract

In this chapter, we explore the implication, in contemporary policy and popular literature, that parents are expected not just to do a good enough job but to do the best job in bringing up their children. We revisit Donald Winnicott and Bruno Bettelheim’s notion of ‘the good enough parent’ and discuss the important ways in which this notion is both similar to and different from current normative accounts of parenting. We look at work on parenting styles and at first-person accounts of parents in order to bring out the important distinction between ‘closure’ and ‘open-endedness’ and the associated ethical aspects of parenting that are obscured by current accounts of good (enough) parenting. We also look at contemporary critics such as Frank Furedi and Jennie Bristow who, in rejecting the attempts by governments and experts to impose prescriptive accounts of good parenting and the associated cultural aspiration to control all aspects of our lives, suggest that people’s parenting will be ‘good enough’ if we just leave them to ‘muddle on’. We address the ways in which these critics overlook the important philosophical, pedagogical and ethical aspects of the parent–child relationship, specifically concerning the important difference between informed moral judgements about how parents treat their children and fully specified notions of ‘good enough parenting’.

Keywords

Parental Behaviour Parenting Style Good Parenting Authoritative Parent Permissive Parenting 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Appiah, K. A. (2008). Experiments in ethics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Apple, R. (2006). Perfect motherhood. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bakhurst, D. (2009). Minds, brains and education. In R. Cigman & A. Davis (Eds.), New philosophies of learning (pp. 57–74). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Baumrind, D. (1966). Effects of authoritative parental control on child behavior. Child Development, 37(4), 887–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumrind, D. (1967). Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 75(1), 43–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bristow, J. (2009). Standing up to supernanny. Exeter: Societas Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
  7. Buber (1947). The education of character. In Between man and man (pp. 104–117). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Doris, J. M. (2002). Lack of character: Personality and moral behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dunne, J. (1993). Back to the rough ground; Practical judgment and the lure of technique. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  10. Edwards, R., & Gillies, V. (2004). Support in parenting: Values and consensus concerning who to turn to. Journal of Social Policy, 33(4), 627–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Field, F. (2010). The foundation years: Preventing poor children becoming poor adults. London: HM Government. Accessed online: http://povertyreview.independent.gov.uk/media/20254/poverty-report.pdf
  12. Furedi, F. (2001). Paranoid parenting. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  13. Gerhardt, S. (2004). Why love matters; how affection shapes a baby’s brain. Hove: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Goodman, J. (2008). Responding to children’s needs: Amplifying the caring ethic. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(2), 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gorer, G. (1955). Exploring English character. London: Cresset Press.Google Scholar
  16. Grossman, D. (2010). To the end of the land. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  17. Gutman, L. M., et al. (2009). Nurturing parenting capability: The early years, research report of the Centre for Research on the Wider Benefits of Learning. London: Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  18. Hardyment, C. (2007). Dream babies: Childcare advice from John Locke to Gina Ford. London: Frances Lincoln Ltd.Google Scholar
  19. Hoffman, D. (2009). How (not) to feel: culture and the politics of emotion in the American parenting advice literature. Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30(1), 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoghughi, M., & Speight, A. (1998). Good enough parenting for all children—A strategy for a healthier society. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 78, 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kellett, J., & Apps, J. (2009). Assessments of parenting and parenting support need. York: National Family and Parenting Institute/Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  22. Layard, R., & Dunn, J. (2009). A good childhood; searching for values in a competitive age. London: The Children’s Society/Penguin.Google Scholar
  23. Nussbaum, M. (2001). The fragility of goodness; luck and ethics in Greek tragedy and philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Nussbaum, M. (2008). Who is the happy warrior? Philosophy poses questions to psychology. Journal of Legal Studies, 37, 81–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. O’Connor, T., & Scott, S. (2007). Parenting and outcomes for children. London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  26. Ruddick, S. (1990). Maternal thinking; towards a politics of peace. London: The Women’s Press.Google Scholar
  27. Sage, L. (2001). Bad blood. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
  28. Scarr, S. (1986). Understanding development. London: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  29. Sontag, S. (2003). Regarding the pain of others. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  30. Sunderland, M. (2006). The science of parenting: How today’s brain research can help you raise happy, emotionally balanced children. London: DK Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Winnicott, D. W. (1953). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 34, 89–97.Google Scholar
  32. Winnicott, D. W. (1964). The child, the family, and the outside world. Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar
  33. Winnicott, D. W. (1977). The Piggle. An account of the psychoanalytic treatment of a little girl. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences Laboratory for Education and SocietyKatholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Faculty of Policy and Society Institute of EducationUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations