Abstract
In trying to articulate the first-person perspective, theoretical perspectives that emphasise some idea of the caring mother (parent) seem, at least at the outset, to be helpful. Feminist work on care and maternal understanding is, in a sense, a development of the work on the priority of the particular, and this is an important theoretical resource as it pays attention to the quality and the nature of particular relationships, thus promising to capture something more akin to the parent–child relationship than the categories and concepts often used in work in philosophy and philosophy of education. In this chapter, we draw on the work of Sara Ruddick on maternal thinking, on Nel Noddings’ work on care specifically as developed in her seminal work Caring (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1984) and on Naomi Stadlen’s attempt to articulate What mothers do, especially when it looks like nothing (Piatkus, London, 2004) to shed some more light on the first-person perspective. Following on from this discussion, we will briefly develop a criticism of recently proposed conceptions of parenting (by Jennie Bristow and Frank Furedi) offered in opposition to the unwanted rise of the parenting expert and the increasing levels of state intervention in family life.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
And this is, of course, hardly surprising since Noddings sometimes draws on Ruddick.
- 2.
We are drawing on a passage from Sheridan Hough (1997, p. 13) here, who uses this line of argument on Nietzsche, but which we find applies equally well for Wittgenstein.
- 3.
For further discussion of this point, see Chap. 6.
References
Bristow, J. (2009). Standing up to supernanny. Exeter: Societas Imprint Academic.
Cavell, S. (1979). The claim of reason. Wittgenstein, skepticism, morality, and tragedy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chua, A. (2011). The battle hymn of the tiger mother. London: Bloomsbury.
Furedi, F. (2001). Paranoid parenting. London: Allen Lane.
Guldberg, H. (2009). Reclaiming childhood. Freedom and play in an age of fear. London: Routledge.
Hough, S. (1997). Nietzsche’s noontide friend. The self as metaphorical double. Pennsylvania: University Park/The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Levering, B., Ramaekers, S., & Smeyers, P. (2009). The narrative of a happy childhood: On the presumption of parents’ power and the demand for integrity. Power and Education, 1, 83–93.
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring. A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Noddings, N. (2003). Happiness and education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ramaekers, S. (2008). Multicultural education: The problems of irreconcilable differences and change. In C. Thompson & G. Weiss (Eds.), Bildende Widerstände – widerständige Bildung: Blickwechsel zwischen Pädagogik und Philosophie (pp. 79–97). Bielefeld: Transcript.
Smith, R. (2010). Total parenting. Educational Theory, 60(3), 357–369.
Stadlen, N. (2004). What mothers do, especially when it looks like nothing. London: Piatkus.
Wittgenstein, L. (1961). Notebooks, 1914–1916 (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ramaekers, S., Suissa, J. (2012). The Intuitive, Caring Mother. In: The Claims of Parenting. Contemporary Philosophies and Theories in Education, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2251-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2251-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2250-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2251-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)