Abstract
In his phenomenology of intersubjectivity, Husserl tries to grasp the Other as “a ‘modification’ of myself”. He describes him or her as an “analogue” of the ego, even though he notes that the word ‘analogue’ is not to be understood here in its usual sense. In the Fifth Cartesian Meditation, it is expressly asserted that “[a]lter signifies alter ego”. In accordance with this conception of an analogical alterity, Husserl bases the phenomenological approach to the Other on the idea of a constitution of an alter ego by the ego. Not surprisingly, this approach to the Other soon gave rise to the objection that the phenomenology of intersubjectivity fails to account for the radical alterity of the Other.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tengelyi, L. (2012). The Role of Interpretation in the Phenomenological Approach to the Other. In: Breeur, R., Melle, U. (eds) Life, Subjectivity & Art. Phaenomenologica, vol 201. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2211-8_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2211-8_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2210-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2211-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)