Skip to main content

Economic, Legal and Social Aspects of Post-Fire Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Post-Fire Management and Restoration of Southern European Forests

Part of the book series: Managing Forest Ecosystems ((MAFE,volume 24))

Abstract

Ideally decisions about post fire management and restoration measures should consider ecological, social and economic criteria. This chapter presents which economic and social aspects are important when implementing post-fire management and restoration. First two key economic criteria, economic efficiency and distributional effects, that should be considered are explored. Whereas, the subsequent sections review legal and social aspects of post fire management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This differs from the term cost efficiency, which measures how well the inputs in a production process are used to produce a fixed set of outputs.

  2. 2.

    For an overview of alternative and complementary evaluation methods see for example EFTEC (2006).

  3. 3.

    In economics, utility is a measure of relative satisfaction.

  4. 4.

    See also Sect. 3.2.1.2.

  5. 5.

    For an example see http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu/library/themes/erosion/ClimChalp/Rusle.html

  6. 6.

    For more details about non-market valuation methods see Sect. 3.2.1.2.

  7. 7.

    More on revealed preference methods in Bockstael and McConnell (2007).

  8. 8.

    More on stated preference methods in Kanninen, B. J. (Ed.) (2007).

  9. 9.

    Actually a number of indicators exist (e.g., benefit-cost ratio, internal rate of return) that are complementary to the net present value and that would be considered when conducting a CBA.

References

  • Abt KL, Huggett RJ, Holmes TP (2008) Designing economic impact assessments for USFS wildfire programmes. In: Holmes TP, Prestemon JP, Abt KL (eds) The Economics of Forest Disturbances: wildfires, storms, and invasive species. Springer, New York, pp 151–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ, Hahn FH (1971) General competitive analysis. Holden-Day, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrio M, Loureiro M, Chas ML (2007) Aproximación a las pérdidas económicas ocasionadas a corto plazo por los incendios forestales en Galicia en 2006. Econ Agraria y Recursos Nat 7:45–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyers JL, Neary DG, Ryan KC, DeBano LF (2005) Wildland fire in ecosystems. Effects of fire on soil and water. United States Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Co

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockstael NE, McConnell KE (2007) Environmental and Resource Valuation with Revealed Preferences. In: Bateman IJ (ed.) Springer. Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourrinet J (1992) Wildland fires and the law: legal aspects of forest fires worldwide. Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JK, Smith JK, (2000) Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on flora, Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT (USA), p 257

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulgaria’s Forest Law, Prom. SG. 125/29 Dec 1997, amend. SG 16/03, Art. 14

    Google Scholar 

  • Butry DT, Mercer DE, Prestemon JP, Pye JM, Holmes TP (2001) What is the price of catastrophic wildfire? J Forest 99:9–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciancio O, Corona P, Marinelli M, Pettenella D (2007) Evaluation of forest fire damages in Italy. Accademia Italiana di Scienze Forestali, Firenze, p 60

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickie M, Messman VL (2004) Parental altruism and the value of avoiding acute illness: Are kids worth more than parents? J Environ Econ Manag 48(3):1146–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2009) Greenhouse gas emission trends and projections in Europe 2009: tracking progress towards Kyoto targets. European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen, p 180

    Google Scholar 

  • EFTEC i.c.w. Environmental Futures Limited (2006) Valuing our natural environment. Final Report. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Englin J, Holmes TP, Lutz J (2008) Wildfire and the Economic Value of Wilderness Recreation. In: Holmes TP, Prestemon JP, Abt KL (eds.) The Economics of Forest Disturbances – Wildfires, Storms, and Invasive Species. Forestry Sciences, vol. 79, p. 191–208

    Google Scholar 

  • EU (2005) Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD). In: C.o.t.E. (ed.) Union, Offical Journal L 277, Brussels, pp 1–40

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1999) Towards a harmonized definition of non-wood forest products. Unasylva 50 (1999/3)

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2007) Fire management. Global assessment 2006. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell EP, Fuhrer E, Ryan D, Andersson F, Huttl R, Piussi P (2000) European forest ecosystems: building the future on the legacy of the past. For Ecol Manag 132:5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowers P, Vaux H, Gardner P, Mills TJ, (1985) Changes in recreation values after fire in the RockyMountains, Res. Note PSW. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range ExperimentStation, Albany, CA, p 15

    Google Scholar 

  • González JR, Kolehmainen O, Pukkala T (2007) Using expert knowledge to model forest stand vulnerability to fire. Comput Electron Agric 55:107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Cabán A (1998) Aspectos Económicos de la Evaluación del Danõ de Incendios. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Cabán A (2007) Wildland fire management policy and fire management economic efficiency in the USDA Forest Service, Wildfire 2007-4th international wildland fire conference, Seville, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Ochoa A, de las Heras J (2002) Effects of post-fire silviculture practices on Pachyrhinus squamosus defoliation levels and growth of Pinus halepensis Mill. For Ecol Manag 167:185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Ochoa AI, López-Serrano FR, de las Heras J (2004) Does post-fire forest management increase tree growth and cone production in Pinus halepensis? For Ecol Manag 188:235–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Görlach B, Landgrebe-Trinkunaite R, Interwies E, Bouzit M, Darmendrail D, Rinaudo JD (2004) Assessing the economic impacts of soil degradation. Ecologic, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley N, Spash CL (1993) Cost-benefit analysis and the environment. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley N, Shogren JF, White B (2001) Introduction to environmental economics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan RM, Scholes RJ, Ash N, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Program). Condition and Trends Working Group (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends: findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks JR (1939) The foundation of welfare economics. Econ J 49:696–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes TP, Abt KL, Huggett RJ, Prestemon JP (2007) Efficient and equitable design of wildfire mitigation programs. In: Daniel TC, Carroll MS, Moseley C, Raish C (eds) People, fire and forests. Oregon State University, Corvallis, pp 143–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes TP, Prestemon JP, Abt KL (2008) An Introduction to the Economics of Forest Disturbance. In: Holmes TP, Prestemon JP, Abt KL (eds.) The Economics of Forest Disturbances – Wildfires, Storms, and Invasive Species. Forestry Sciences, vol. 79, p. 3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Izhaki I, Adar M (1997) The effects of post-fire management on bird community succession. Int J Wildland Fire 7:335–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JRC (2009) Review of the methodologies for the assessment of economic impacts of forest fires and economic efficiency of fire management. In: Pettenella D, Florian D, Mavsar R, Goio I, González-Cabán A (eds.) JRC – ISE, Ispra, p 108

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor N (1939) Welfare propositions of economics and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Econ J 49:549–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanninen BJ (ed) (2007) Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies. In: Bateman IJ (ed.) Springer. Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent B, Gebert K, McCaffrey S, Martin W, Calkin D, Schuster E, Martin I, Wise Bender H, Alward G, Kumagai Y, Cohn PJ, Carroll M, Williams D, Ekarius C (2003) Social and economic issues of the Hayman Fire. In: Service UF (ed.) General technical report RMRS-GTR. USDA Forest Service, pp 315–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochi I, Loomis JB, Champ P, Donovan GH (2008) Health and economic impact of wildfires: literature review, III international symposium on fire economics, planning and policy: common problems and approaches, Carolina, Puerto Rico

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb D (2009) Economic, social and cultural factors affecting landscape restoration. In: Bautista S, Aronson J, Vallejo VR (eds) Land restoration to combat desertification. CEAM, Valencia, pp 35–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis J (2004) Do nearby forest fires cause a reduction in residential property values? J For Econ 10:149–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis JB, Englin J, Gonález-Cabán A (1999) Effects of fire on the economic value of forest recreation in the Intermountain West: preliminary results. In: Gonález-Cabán A, Omi PN (eds.) Symposium on fire economics, planning, and policy: bottom lines. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis JB, Englin J, Gonález-Cabán A (2001) Testing for differential effects of forest fires on hiking and mountain biking demand and benefits. J Agr Res Econ 26:508–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques MA, Mora E (1998) Effects on erosion of two post-fire management practices: clear-cutting versus non-intervention. Soil Till Res 45:433–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell A, Whinston M, Green J (1995) Microeconomic theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavsar R, Riera P (2007) Valoración Económica de las Principales Externalidades de los Bosques Mediterráneos Españoles: Informe final. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Barcelona, p 93

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavsar R, Farreras V, Kovac M, Japelj A (2009) Written description of the private and social evaluation models. Deliverable D4.5-2 of the Integrated project “Fire Paradox”, Project no. FP6-018505, European Commission, p 76

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer A (1995) Forest valuation for decision making: lessons of experience and proposals for improvement. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, February 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer DE, Jeffrey PP, David TB, John MP (2007) Evaluating alternative prescribed burning policies to reduce net economic damages from wildfire. Am J Agric Econ 89:63–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merlo M, Croitoru L (2005) Valuing Mediterranean forests: towards total economic value. CABI Publishing, Wallingford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Molina JR, Rodriguez Y, Silva F, Herrera MA, Zamora R (2009) A simulation tool for socio-economic planning on forest fire suppression management. In: Gomez E, Alvarez K (eds) Forest fires: detection, suppression and prevention. Nova Science Publishers Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteil C, Herrero G, (2010) An overview of policies and practices related to fire ignitions at the European Union level. In: Sande Silva J, Rego F, Fernandes P, Rigolot E (eds.) Towards integrated fire management – outcomes of the European Project Fire Paradox. European Forest Institute Research Report 23, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgera E, Cirelli MT (2009) Forest fires and the law. A guide for national drafters based on the fire management voluntary guidelines. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller J, Loomis J, González-Cabán A (2007) Do repeated wildfires change homebuyer’s demand for homes in high risk areas? A hedonic analysis of the short- and long-term effects of repeated wildfires on home prices in southern California. J Real Estate Finan Econ 38:155–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Napoleone C, Jappiot M (2008) Et si l’efficacité de la lutte contre les incendies jouait comme une incitation aux comprtements les plis risqués? Forêt méditerranéenne 29 (1):3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Navrud S (2001) Valuing health impacts from air pollution in Europe. Env Res Econ 20(4):305–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2000) Services: statistics on value added and employment, OECD 2000 edition, Introduction, p 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Portugal’s Decree-Law No. 139/88; Bulgaria’s Forest Law, Prom. SG. 125/29 Dec 1997, amend. SG 16/03, Art.42

    Google Scholar 

  • Prestemon JP, Holmes TP (2004) Market dynamics and optimal timber salvage after a natural catastrophe. For Sci 50(4):495–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Riera P, García D, Kriström B, Brännlund R (2005) Manual de Economía Ambiental y de los Recursos Naturales. International Thomson Editores Spain. 355 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Riera P, Mavsar R, Mogas J (2008) Forest fire valuation and evaluation: a survey. In: Cesaro L, Gatto P, Pettenella D (eds) The multifunctional role of forests – policies, methods and case studies. European Forest Institute, Padova, pp 367–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittmaster R, Adamowicz WL, Amiro B, Pelletier RT (2006) Economic analysis of health effects from forest fires. Can J For Res 36:868–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum KL (2007) Legislative drafting guide: a practitioner’s view. FAO Legal Paper (on-line) #64 (available at www.fao.org)

  • Ryan RL, Hamin E (2006) Engaging communities in post-fire restoration: Forest treatments and community-agency relations after the Cerro Grande Fire. In McCaffrey S (ed.) The public and wildland fire management: social science findings for managers. General technical report, NRS-1. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, pp 87–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan RL, Hamin E (2007) After the fire: local residents’ perceptions of post-fire forest restoration. In: Extended abstracts from the human dimensions of wildland fire conference, 10/23-25, Colorado S, McCaffrey P, Woodward M, Robinson, compilers. International Association of Wildland Fire, Fort Collins pp 54–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg DV, Ottmar RD, Peterson JL, Core J (2002) Wildland fire on ecosystems: effects of fire on air, Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, p 79

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JK (2000) Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on fauna, Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT (USA), p 83

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanos I, Raftoyannis Y, Goudelis G, Xanthopoulou E, Samara T, Tsiontsis A (2007) Effects of post-fire logging on soil and vegetation recovery in a Pinus halepensis Mill. forest of Greece. Eco- and Ground Bio-Engineering: the use of vegetation to improve slope stability developments in plant and soil sciences 103:345–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden R, Williams A (1978) The principles of practical cost-benefit analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • US.EPA (2004) Air quality criteria for particulate matter (final report, Oct 2004). In: Agency UEP (ed.) US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Vega JA, Fernández C, Pérez-Gorostiaga P, Fonturbel T (2008) The influence of fire severity, serotiny, and post-fire management on Pinus pinaster Ait. recruitment in three burnt areas in Galicia (NW Spain). For Ecol Manag 256:1596–1603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velez R (2000) La defensa contra los incendios forestales: Fundamentos y experiencias. McGraw-Hill Inc., Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Velez R (2009) The causing factors: a focus on economic and social driving forces. In: Birot Y (ed) Living with wildfires: what can science tell us. EFI Discussion Papers, 15, p 21–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade DD, Lunsford JD (1988) A guide for prescribed fire in southern forests, Technical Publication R8-TP. USDA Forest Service, Southern Region, Atlanta, p 56

    Google Scholar 

  • Zybach B, Dubrasich M, Brenner G, Marker J (2009) U.S. Wildfire Cost-Plus-Loss Economics Project: the “One-Pager” checklist. John Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center, p 20

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Mavsar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mavsar, R., Varela, E., Corona, P., Barbati, A., Marsh, G. (2012). Economic, Legal and Social Aspects of Post-Fire Management. In: Moreira, F., Arianoutsou, M., Corona, P., De las Heras, J. (eds) Post-Fire Management and Restoration of Southern European Forests. Managing Forest Ecosystems, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2208-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics