Advertisement

Active Ageing: Developing a Quantitative Multidimensional Measure

  • Laurie BuysEmail author
  • Evonne Miller
Chapter
Part of the Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (EDAP, volume 15)

Abstract

In response to the global phenomenon of population ageing, numerous countries have turned to international directives promoting active, healthy or successful ageing. However, there is significant disagreement and debate about how to define well-being in later life, with no consensus on either terminology or measurement. Through a survey of 2,645 older Australians, this chapter explores the extent to which work, learning, social, emotional, spirituality, health, home environment and life events contribute to active ageing. Factor analyses identified that three key concepts explain 57% of the variance and appear to be critical in ‘active ageing’: coping with life and self-belief (26%), social and life participation (22%) and physical health and functioning (9%). The finding that issues relate to life engagement, mental/emotional health and social relationships dominated the factor structure of ‘active ageing’ highlights the importance of emotional and social dimensions in active ageing.

Keywords

Active Ageing Successful Ageing Voluntary Work Productive Ageing Quantifiable Indicator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was funded primarily by a QUT Strategic Collaborative Program Grant. Thanks to Nikki David (statistician) for help with statistical analyses and interpretation. The contributions of the Triple A team are also acknowledged: Lovie-Kitchin, J., Boulton-Lewis, G., Tedman-Jones, J., Nayak, R., Courtney, M., Edwards, H., Anderson, D. and Zlobicki, M.

References

  1. Bass, S. A., Caro, F. G., & Chen, Y. (1993). Achieving a productive aging society. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  2. Bowling, A., Banister, D., Sutton, S., Evans, O., & Windsor, J. (2002). A multidimensional model of the quality of life in older age. Aging and Mental Health, 6(4), 355–371.Google Scholar
  3. Bowling, A., & Dieppe, P. (2005). What is successful ageing and who should define it? British Medical Journal, 331, 1548–1551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. (1993). A self-assessment guide: Maintaining seniors’ independence through home adaptations. Ottawa: Canada Morgage and Housing Corporation.Google Scholar
  5. Crowther, M. R., Parker, M. W., Achenbaum, W. A., Larimore, W. L., & Koenig, H. G. (2002). Rowe and Kahn’s model of successful aging revisited: Positive spirituality - the forgotten factor. The Gerontologist, 42(5), 613–620.Google Scholar
  6. Evans, J. G., & Bond, J. (1997). The challenges of age research. Age and Ageing, 26, 43–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gergen, M. M., & Gergen, K. J. (2001). Positive aging: New images for a new age. Ageing International, 27(1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glass, T. A. (2003). Assessing the success of successful aging. Annals of Internal Medicine, 139(5), 382–383.Google Scholar
  9. Grundy, E., & Bowling, A. (1999). Enhancing the quality of extended life years: Identification of the oldest old with a very good and very poor quality of life. Aging & Mental Health, 3(3), 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hansen-Kyle, L. (2005). A concept analysis of healthy aging. Nursing Forum, 40(2), 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoen, B., Thelander, M., & Worsley, J. (1994). Ryff’s survey (condensed)How I feel about myself” (Report on the evaluation of effectiveness of a community program for aphasic adults). Stouffville: York-Durham Aphasia Centre.Google Scholar
  12. Holstein, M. B., & Minkler, M. (2003). Self, society and the “new gerontology”. The Gerontologist, 43(6), 787–796.Google Scholar
  13. Inui, T. S. (2003). The need for an integrated biopsychosocial approach to research on successful aging. Annals of Internal Medicine, 139, 391–394.Google Scholar
  14. Kalache, A., & Keller, I. (1999). The WHO perspective on active aging. Promotion and Education, 6(4), 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Koenig, H., Westlund, R., George, L., Hughes, D., Blazer, D., & Hybels, C. (1993). Abbreviating the Duke’s Social Index for use in chronically ill elderly individuals. Psychosomatics, 34, 61–69.Google Scholar
  16. Mangione, C. M., Lee, P. P., Pitts, J., Guitierrez, P., Berry, S., & Hays, R. D. (1998). Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI_VFQ). Archives of Ophthalmology, 116, 1496–1504.Google Scholar
  17. Minkler, M., & Fadem, P. (2002). Successful aging: A disability perspective. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 12(4), 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Norbeck, J. (1984). Modification of recent life event questionnaires for use with female respondents. Research in Nursing and Health, 7, 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. O’Reilly, P., & Caro, F. G. (1994). Productive aging: An overview of the literature. Journal of Aging Society Policy, 6(3), 39–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Purdie, N., & Boulton-Lewis, G. (2001). The learning needs of older adults. Educational Gerontology, 29, 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Putnam, M. (2002). Linking aging theory and disability models: Increasing the potential to explore aging with physical impairment. The Gerontologist, 42(6), 799–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1998). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37(4), 433–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sarason, I., Johnson, J., & Siegel, J. (1978). Assessing the impact of life changes: Development of the life experiences survey. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 932–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. SF-36v2™. (2003). Health Survey ©1992: Health Assessment Lab, Medical Outcomes Trust and Quality Metric Incorporated All Rights Reserved. SF-36® is a registered trademark of the Medical Outcomes Trust, (IQOLA SF-36v2 Standard, English). (Australia) 7/03.Google Scholar
  25. Tate, R. B., Lah, L., & Cuddy, T. E. (2003). Definition of successful aging by elderly Canadian males: The Manitoba follow-up study. The Gerontologist, 43(5), 735–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Walker, A. (2002). A strategy for active ageing. International Social Security Review, 55(1), 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wong, T. P. (2001). An old question revisited: Current understanding of aging theories. McGill Journal of Medicine, 6, 41–47.Google Scholar
  28. World Health Organisation. (2002). Active ageing: A policy framework. Retrieved April 18, 2005, from http://www.who.int/hpr/ageing/ActiveAgeingPolicyFrame.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Design, Faculty of Built Environment and EngineeringQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.School of DesignQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations