Skip to main content

Abstract

Whereas in earlier times copyright was a clear-cut concept both for creators and users of original works of art, today both parties seem to be tangled in the web of modern copyright regulation. Copyright is generally seen as a complex, technological matter in which only lawyers can find their way these days. The challenge for legislators is to protect the cornerstones of copyright law (culture, cultural diversity, mutual respect, freedom of expression, etcetera), while taking into account the technological and sociological developments.

Evi Werkers works as legal researcher at the Interdisciplinary Centre for Law and ICT (ICRI – KULeuven, IBBT), where she specializes in copyright and media law and is currently writing a Phd in this field. For more information please visit: http://www.law.kuleuven.be/icri/peope.phd?id=100

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

     For an analysis on fan fiction see for example Schwabach (2009).

  2. 2.

     Pres. Court Brussels 13 February 2007.

  3. 3.

     European Court of Justice 19 July 2009, Infopaq International A/S vs. Danske Dagblades Forening, http://curia.europa.eu

  4. 4.

    In many countries like Belgium, authors are granted certain moral rights which are usually divided into three categories: divulgation, paternity and integrity.

  5. 5.

    Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, O.J. L. 22.06.2001, 10.

  6. 6.

    Article 2 Copyright Directive 2001/29/EC.

  7. 7.

    Article 3 Copyright Directive 2001/29/EC.

  8. 8.

    Article 6 Copyright Directive 2001/29/EC.

  9. 9.

    Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights, O.J. L. 195, 02.06.2004, 16 (Enforcement Directive).

  10. 10.

    Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive amending Directive 2006/116/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the term of protection of copyright and related rights, COM(2008)464/3. The proposal is currently still under debate at European Union level.

  11. 11.

    Commission Staff Working Document accompanying the Proposal for a Council Directive amending Council Directive 2006/116/EC as regards the term of protection of copyright and related rights. Impact assessment on the legal and economic situation of performers and record producers in the European Union, (COM)(2008) 464 final http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/term-protection/term-protection_en.htm

  12. 12.

    Guibault and Hugenholtz (2006), and following.

  13. 13.

    For a more profound legal analysis consult Coudert and Werkers (2008); Werkers and Coudert (2008).

  14. 14.

    Also known as the international “three-steps-test”.

  15. 15.

    Article 5 Copyright Directive 2001/29/EC.

  16. 16.

    Article 5.1. Copyright Directive 2001/29/EC.

  17. 17.

    Article 6.4. Copyright Directive 2001/29/EC.

  18. 18.

    For a profound analysis of the chilling effect on creativity see for example Arewa (2007).

  19. 19.

    For an overview see http://ec.europa.eu/avpolicy/other_actions/content_online/index_en.htm

  20. 20.

    Green Paper copyright in the knowledge economy, COM(2008)466/3

  21. 21.

    Public Consultation 2009–2010, Creative Content in a European digital single market: Challenges for the future. Contributions can be found via the following link: http://ec.europa.eu/avpolicy/other_actions/content_online/consultation_2009/index_en.htm

References

  • Arewa, O. 2007. The freedom to copy: copyright, creation and context, Northwestern University School of Law and Legal Theory Series N 07–06. UC Davis Law Review 41(2): 477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y. 2006. The wealth of networks. How social production transforms markets and freedom, 392. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coudert, F., and E. Werkers. 2008. In the aftermath of the promusicae case: How to strike the balance?. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Advanced Access, October 2008, 22 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasser, U., and S. Ernst. June 2006. From Shakespeare to DJ Danger Mouse: A quick look at copyright and user creativity in the digital age. Research Publication Berkman Center for Internet and Society, 2006-05: 19 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guibault, L. 2008. Creative commons: Struggling to keep it simple. www.ivir.nl/publications/guibault/KnowRight08_Paper.pdf

  • Guibault, L.M., and P.B. Hugenholtz. 2006. The recasting of copyright and related rights for the knowledge economy, 139. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam for the DG Internal Market.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helberger, N., N. Dufft, S. Van Gompel en, and B. Hugenholtz. 2008. Never forever: Why extending the term of protection for sound recordings is a bad idea. European Intellectual Property Review 30: 174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huygen, A. et al. 2009 Economic and cultural effects of file-sharing on music, film and games. TNO Rapport, 10 Feb 2009, 128 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • IP/09/627. 2009. Commission welcomes Parliament vote on copyright term, 23/04/2009. http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/09/627&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en

  • Kretschmer, M. 2008. Creativity stiffled? A joint academic statement on the proposed copyright term extension for sound recordings. European Intellectual Property Review 30: 341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwabach, A. 2009. The Harry Potter Lexicon and the world of fandom: Fan fiction, outsider works, and copyright. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 70(3): 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towse, R. 2006. Copyright and creativity: An application of cultural economics. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues 3(2): 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werkers, E., and F. Coudert. 2008 The fight against piracy in peer-to-peer networks: the sword of Damocles hanging over ISP’s heads?. Paper submitted for the 17th international conference on Information Systems Development (ISD 2008), Paphos, Cyprus, 25–27 Aug 2008, 12 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evi Werkers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Werkers, E. (2012). Copyright: A Curse or a Blessing?. In: Vanderbeeken, R., Le Roy, F., Stalpaert, C., Aerts, D. (eds) Drunk on Capitalism. An Interdisciplinary Reflection on Market Economy, Art and Science. Einstein Meets Magritte: An Interdisciplinary Reflection on Science, Nature, Art, Human Action and Society, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2082-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics