Skip to main content

Abstract

Humanities move in a direction of controlled and politically directed disciplines. The so-called ‘corporatization’ of the sciences touches the humanities also: there is ever less free research. Where natural sciences and the health sciences are in a tightening grip of business groups, the humanities are openly approached by secret services on the one hand and held in a bureaucratic grip on the other hand. The critical assessment of these developments is called for.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

     In a small quest I launched (through the cover of an interest group promoting ‘free research’) on these issues to Chancellors and the Minister of education in Flanders, Belgium, the reaction by all but one responsible persons was: ‘you may have a point, but we as good managers have to distribute money and hence we need a quantitative measure to decide what to subsidize’.

References

  • Bourdieu, P. 1982. La distinction. Paris: Editions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. 1970. The new Mandarins. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (ed.). 1995. The humanities in the USA during the cold war. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R. 1999. The pleasure of finding things out. New York: Perseus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda, S. 2004. Cultural liberty in today’s diverse world. Human development report 2004. New York: United Nations Development Progam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loobuyck, P. (ed.). 2007. Welke Universiteit wensen wij (niet)? Gent: Academia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinxten, R. 2007. De Strepen van de Zebra. Antwerp: Houtekiet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, H. 2005. America the ambivalent. Anthropology Today 21(5): 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. 2008. ‘The corporatization of academia.’ Anthropology Newsletter, February 2008: 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 2000. Rationality and freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hendrik (Rik) Pinxten .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pinxten, H. (2012). The Humanities Under Fire?. In: Vanderbeeken, R., Le Roy, F., Stalpaert, C., Aerts, D. (eds) Drunk on Capitalism. An Interdisciplinary Reflection on Market Economy, Art and Science. Einstein Meets Magritte: An Interdisciplinary Reflection on Science, Nature, Art, Human Action and Society, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2082-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics