Abstract
Renewable energy is seen as an alternative to conventional energy sources, which are predominantly fossil-fuel based and cause dangerous climate change. Various forms of renewable energy also require some resource inputs and installations need to be replaced every 30 years or so. This leads an analyst to the problem of careful selection of a pool of energy sources. Although the conventional form of analysis has largely been centred on cost-minimization, more and more additional criteria, belonging to the economic, social, technical, risk, resource and emissions realms are introduced to make justified decisions on the selection of one technology or of one combination over the other. This chapter makes the first step towards this goal by providing taxonomy of criteria used in decision making regarding renewable energy; it also reviews existing modelling approaches which are currently used in the field. Methodologically, the emphasis in this chapter is on multicriteria decision aid tools.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Afgan NH and Carvalho MG (2002) Multi-criteria Assessment of New and Renewable Energy Power Plants Energy 27.8 739-755
Agabus H, Landsberg M and Tammoja H (2007) Reduction of CO2 Emissions in Estonia During 2000–2030 Oil Shale 24 209-224
Barker T (1981) Projecting Economic Structure with a Large-Scale Econometric Model Futures 13.6 458-467
Barker T et al (1980a) The Cambridge Multisectoral Dynamic Model: An Instrument for National Economic Policy Analysis Journal of Policy Modeling 2.3 319-344
Barker T, Ekins P and Foxon T (2007a) Macroeconomic Effects of Efficiency Policies for Energy-Intensive Industries: The Case of the UK Climate Change Agreements, 2000–2010 Energy Economics 29.4 760-778
Barker T, Ekins P and Foxon T (2007b) The Macro-Economic Rebound Effect and the UK Economy Energy Policy 35.10 4935-4946
Barker T, Junankar S, et al. (2007c) Carbon Leakage from Unilateral Environmental Tax Reforms in Europe, 1995â“2005 Energy Policy 35.12 6281-6292
Berger C et al (1990) Modelling Energy Use in the Mineral Processing Industries of Ontario with MARKAL-Ontario Energy 15.9 741-758
Burton J and Hubacek K (2007) Is Small Beautiful? A Multicriteria Assessment of Small-Scale Energy Technology Applications in Local Governments Energy Policy 35.12 6402-6412
Cavallaro F and Ciraolo L (2005) A Multicriteria Approach to Evaluate Wind Energy Plants on an Italian Island Energy Policy 33.2 235-244
Chatzimouratidis AI and Pilavachi PA (2008) Sensitivity Analysis of the Evaluation of Power Plants Impact on the Living Standard Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Energy Conversion and Management 49.12 3599-3611
Chen W (2005) The Costs of Mitigating Carbon Emissions in China: Findings from China MARKAL-MACRO Modeling Energy Policy 33.7 885-896
Contaldi M, Gracceva F and Tosato G (2007) Evaluation of Green-Certificates Policies Using the MARKAL-MACRO-Italy Model Energy Policy 35.2 797-808
Diakoulaki D and Karangelis F (2007) Multi-criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Alternative Scenarios for the Power Generation Sector in Greece Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 11.4 716-727
Endo E and Ichinohe M (2006) Analysis on Market Deployment of Photovoltaics in Japan by Using Energy System Model MARKAL Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 90.18–19 3061-3067
Gamboa G and Munda G (2007) The Problem of Windfarm Location: A Social Multi-criteria Evaluation Framework Energy Policy 35.3 1564-1583
Gay PW and Proops John LR (1993) Carbon Dioxide Production by the UK Economy: An Input-Output Assessment Applied Energy 44.2 113-130
Georgopoulou E, Lalas D and Papagiannakis L (1997) A Multicriteria Decision Aid Approach for Energy Planning Problems: The Case of Renewable Energy Option European Journal of Operational Research 103.1 38-54
Gielen D (1995) Toward Integrated Energy and Materials Policies?: A Case Study on CO2 Reduction in the Netherlands Energy Policy 23.12 1049-1062
Haralambopoulos DA and Polatidis H (2003) Renewable Energy Projects: Structuring a Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Framework Renewable Energy 28.6 961-973
Ichinohe M and Endo E (2006) Analysis of the Vehicle Mix in the Passenger-Car Sector in Japan for CO2 Emissions Reduction by a MARKAL Model Applied Energy 83.10 1047-1061
Madlener R and Stagl S (2005) Sustainability-Guided Promotion of Renewable Electricity Generation Ecological Economics 53.2 147-167
Mavrotas G, Diakoulaki D and Capros P (2003) Combined MCDA-IP Approach for Project Selection in the Electricity Market Annals of Operations Research 120.1–4 159-170
Morris SC, Goldstein GA and Fthenakis VM (2002) NEMS and MARKAL-MACRO Models for Energy-Environmental-Economic Analysis: A Comparison of the Electricity and Carbon Reduction Projections Environmental Modeling and Assessment 7.3 207-216
Naughten B (2002) Some MARKAL capabilities inAustralian energy policy analysis and modeling the mandated target for renewable electricity in Australian MARKAL Available at http://adl.brs.gov.au/data/warehouse/pe_abarebrs99000834/PC12388.pdf
Nguyen KQ (2007) Impacts of Wind Power Generation and CO2 Emission Constraints on the Future Choice of Fuels and Technologies in the Power Sector of Vietnam Energy Policy 35.4 2305-2312
Noble BF (2004) A Multicriteria Analysis of Canadian Electricity Supply Futures The Canadian Geographer/Le Ge´ographe canadien 48.1 11-28
Proops JLR (1977) Input-Output Analysis and Energy Intensities: A Comparison of Some Methodologies Applied Mathematical Modelling 1.4 181-186
Proops John LR (1984) Modelling the Energy-Output Ratio Energy Economics 6.1 47-51
Proops John LR and Speck S (1996) Comparison of Neoclassical and Neo-Austrian Growth Models Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 7.2 173-192
Rath-Nagel S and Stocks K (1982) Energy modelling for technology assessment: The MARKAL approach. Omega, 10.5 493-505
Schulz TF et al (2008) Intermediate Steps Towards the 2000 W Society in Switzerland: An Energy-Economic Scenario Analysis Energy Policy 36.4 1303-1317
Shipkovs P, Kashkarova G and Shipkovs M (1999) Renewable Energy Utilization in Latvia Renewable Energy 16.1–4 1241-1244
Siskos J and Hubert P (1983) Multi-criteria Analysis of the Impacts of Energy Alternatives: A Survey and a New Comparative Approach European Journal of Operational Research 13.3 278-299
Strachan N, Kannan R and Pye S (2007) Final Report on DTI-DEFRA Scenarios and Sensitivities Using the UK MARKAL and MARKAL MACRO Energy System Models
Unger T and Ahlgren EO (2005) Impacts of a Common Green Certificate Market on Electricity and CO2-Emission Markets in the Nordic Countries Energy Policy 33.16 2152-2163
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shmelev, S.E. (2012). Climate Change and Renewable Energy: How to Choose the Optimal Pool of Technologies. In: Ecological Economics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1972-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1972-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1971-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1972-9
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)