Abstract
This chapter demonstrates a method to summarise instructional materials that can be used to distinguish different types of curriculum. Using a U.S. national longitudinal sample, indices derived from textbook content coverage were used in quantitative analyses to illustrate curricular differences. Textbook data collected from mathematics teachers of public school students from grades 7 through 12 were coded to capture content and performance expectation intended by the textbooks. Different approaches were examined to quantitatively summarise the data to characterise students’ exposure to mathematics content. The results were tested against the expectation of the long-term effects of tracking in the American middle schools. By grouping students by the type of courses they took in seventh and eighth grades, different approaches to defining the “amount” of mathematics exposure in the subsequent years were compared, each capturing different characteristics of the mathematics contents represented in the textbooks. The results showed that students who enrolled in Algebra prior to ninth grade were exposed to almost three times as much of mathematics contents as students when did not take algebra in secondary school. The gap in exposure persisted when contrasting these students with other students who had algebra in high school though to a smaller extent. As it is broadly accepted that textbooks are a good reflection of the implemented curriculum in most countries and a particularly accurate reflection in the United States, the chapter concluded with an a path-analytic model showing that exposure to demanding curricular coverage in mathematics strongly predicted the mathematics achievement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This work was supported by NSF grant RED-9909569. All conclusions and findings reflect the views of the principal investigator and co-investigators and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or its staff.
- 2.
A very small number of students take pre-algebra in grade six and algebra in grade seven, but in the early 1990s when the LSAY was in the field, this pattern was found in less than 1% of students. In this analysis, students who took their first algebra course in either grade seven or eight were combined into the most advanced track. As the TIMSS results indicate, students in many countries routinely take algebra in grades six and seven (Schmidt, McKight, & Raizen, 1997a).
References
Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor’s degree attainment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
Atanda, R. (1999). Do gatekeeper courses expand education options? (NCES Report 99-303). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Cogan, L. S., Schmidt, W. H., & Wiley, D. E. (2001). Who takes what math and in which track? Using TIMSS to characterize U.S. students’ eighth-grade mathematics learning opportunities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 323–341.
Crawford, D. B., & Snider, V. E. (2000). Effective mathematics instruction: The importance of curriculum. Education and Treatment of Children, 23(2), 122–142.
Floden, R. E., Porter, A. C., Schmidt, W. H., Freeman, D. J., & Schwille, J. R. (1981). Responses to curriculum pressures: A policy-capturing study of teacher decisions about content. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(2), 129–141.
Fuson, K. C., Stigler, J. W., & Bartsch, K. (1988). Grade placement of addition and subtraction topics in Japan, mainland China, the Soviet Union, Taiwan, and the United States. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 449–456.
Hoffer, (1992). Middle school ability grouping and student-achievement in science and mathematics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 14(3), 205–227.
Li, Y. (2000). A comparison of problems that follow selected content presentations in American and Chinese mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 234–241.
Mayer, R. E., Sims, V., & Tajika, H. (1995). A comparison of how textbooks teach mathematical problem solving in Japan and the United States. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 443–460.
McFarland, D.A. (2006). Curricular flows: Trajectories, turning points, and assignment criteria in high school math careers. Sociology of Education, 79(3), 177–205.
McKnight, C. C., Crosswhite, F. J., Dossey, J. A., Kifer, E., Swafford, J. O., Travers, K. J., et al. (1987). The underachieving curriculum: Assessing U.S. school Mathematics from an international perspective. Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing Company.
Miller, J. D. (2004). Student achievement in context: The influence of parent and home factors on student achievement in Mathematics. Paper presented at AERA Annual Meeting, San Diego.
Miller, J. D. (2006). Parents, teachers, and curriculum: Partners in student achievement in mathematics. Presentation at the Lappen-Phillps-Fizgerald Endowed Chair Lecture, Michigan State University, October 11, 2006.
Miller, S. P., & Mercer, C. D. (1997). Educational aspects of mathematics disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(1), 47–56.
Nicely, R. F., Jr. (1985). Higher-order thinking skills in mathematics textbooks. Educational Leadership, 42(7), 26–30.
Nicely, R. F., Jr., Fiber, H. R., & Bobango, J. C. (1986). The cognitive content of elementary school mathematics textbooks. Arithmetic Teacher, 34, 60.
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment. (2003, 2006). Retrieved on July 12, 2010, from http://www.pisa.oecd.org
Porter, A. C. (2002). Measuring the content of instruction: Uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 3–14.
Porter, A. C., Floden, R. E., Freeman, D. J., Schmidt, W. H., & Schwille, J. R. (1986). Content determinants, Research Series No. 179B. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.
Schmidt, W. H. (1983). High school course-taking: Its relationship to achievement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 15(3), 311–332.
Schmidt, W. H. (2003). Too little too late: American High Schools in an international context. Brookings Papers on Education Policy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Cogan, L. S., Jakwerth, P. M., & Houang, R. T. (1999). Facing the consequences: Using TIMSS for a closer look at U.S. mathematics and science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Houang, R. T., Wang, H. C., Wiley, D. E., Cogan, L. S., et al. (2001). Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison or curriculum and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (1997a). A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Valverde, G. A., Houang, R. T., & Wiley, D. E. (1997b). Many visions, many aims: A cross-national investigation of curricular intentions in school mathematics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Schneider, B., Swanson, C. B., & Riegle-Crumb, C. (1997). Opportunities for Learning: Course Sequences and Positional Advantages. Social Psychology of Education, 2(1), 25–53.
Stevenson, D. L., Schiller, K. S., & Schneider, B. (1994). Sequences of opportunities of learning. Sociology of Education, 67, 184–198.
Stigler, J. W., Fuson, K. C., Ham, M., & Kim, M. S. (1986). An analysis of addition and subtraction word problems in American and Soviet mathematics books. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 153–171.
Suter, L. E. (2000). Is student achievement immutable? Evidence from international studies on schooling and student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 70, 529–545.
TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. (2003, 2007). Retrieved July 12, 2010, from http://timss.bc.edu/
Törnroos, J. (2005). Mathematics textbooks, opportunity to learn and student achievement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31, 315–327.
Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Acknowledgement
I would like to thank my colleagues Jon D. Miller, Richard T. Houang and Linda G. Kimmel who co-authored this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schmidt, W.H. (2011). Measuring Content Through Textbooks: The Cumulative Effect of Middle-School Tracking. In: Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., Trouche, L. (eds) From Text to 'Lived' Resources. Mathematics Teacher Education, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1966-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1966-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1965-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1966-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)