Skip to main content

Modes of Engagement: Understanding Teachers’ Transactions with Mathematics Curriculum Resources

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Mathematics Teacher Education ((MTEN,volume 7))

Abstract

Drawing on research on elementary teachers in the United States, this chapter explores and theorizes the relationships that teachers develop with curriculum resources as they use them. The central argument is that teachers are positioned by and through their encounters with curriculum materials as particular kinds of users of them. The chapter examines modes of address in curriculum resources and modes of engagement taken up by teachers to illustrate how this positioning happens, including how teachers participate in it through their epistemological stances and orientations. Modes of address are experienced through various forms found in curriculum resource, including structure, look, voice, medium, and genre. Modes of engagement are seen in forms of teacher reading, including what the teacher reads for, which parts she reads, when she reads, and who she is as a reader. Four examples of teachers engaging with a curriculum resource designed to reflect the NCTM Standards are used to illustrate how modes and forms of address interact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Even though they were not designed by commercial publishers, the Standards-based curriculum programs are published and marketed by commercial publishers.

  2. 2.

    It is worth noting that the second edition of the Investigations (TERC, 2008) has a physical appearance more in line with conventional mathematics teacher’s guides than the first edition, although it continues to be organized in modules.

  3. 3.

    The Investigations curriculum is described in more detail in Section 6.6.

References

  • Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualising resources as a theme for teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 205–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. W. (2009). The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction, (pp. 17–36). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collopy, R. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers’ learning. Elementary School Journal, 103(3), 287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, C., & Sherin, M.G. (2009). Developing curriculum vision and trust: Changes in teachers’ curriculum strategies. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 321–337). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth, E. (1997). Teaching positions: Difference, pedagogy, and the power of address. New York: Teachers College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2009).Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2010). Des ressources aux documents, travail du professeur et genèses documentaires. (From resources to documents, teacher’s work and documentational geneses). In G. Gueudet & L. Trouche (Eds.), Ressources vives. Le travail documentaire des professeurs en mathématiques (pp. 57–74). Rennes, France: Presses Universitaires de Rennes et INRP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). Positioning theory. Oxford, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, G. M. (1999). Two teachers’ conceptions of a reform-oriented curriculum: Implications for mathematics teacher development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(3), 227–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, E., & Pimm, D. (1996). ‘this is so’: A text on texts. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics, part 1 (pp. 371–409). Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolinas, C., & Wozniak, F. (2010). Rôle de la documentation scolaire dans la situation du professeur: le cas de l’enseignement des mathématiques à l’école élémentaire (Role of teaching documentation inthe teacher’s situation: the case of mathematics at elementary school). InG. Gueudet & L. Trouche (Eds.), Ressources vives. Le travail documentaire des professeurs en mathématiques (pp. 183–199). Rennes, France: Presses Universitaires de Rennes et INRP.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1989). The curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCTM. (2000). The principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ongstad, S. (2006). Mathematics and mathematics education as triadic communication? A semiotic framework exemplified. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 247–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otte, M. (1986). What is a text? In B. Christiansen, A. G. Howson, M. Otte (Eds.), Perspectives on math education (pp. 173–202). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47–87). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. T. (1991). Abdicating authority for knowing: A teacher’s use of an innovative mathematics curriculum. (Elementary Subjects Center Series No. 42). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching, Center for the Learning and Teaching of Elementary Subjects.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. T. (1996). Changing texts, teachers, and teaching: The role of textbooks in reform in mathematics education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers’ curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 315–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers’ learning? Two fourth grade teachers’ use of new mathematics text. Elementary School Journal, 100, 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts of research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. T. (2010). Modes d’engagement: Comprendre les transactions des professeurs avec les ressources curriculaires en mathématiques (Modes of engagement: Understanding teachers’ transactions with mathematics curriculum resources). In G. Gueudet & L. Trouche (Eds.), Ressources vives, le travail documentaire des professeurs, le cas des mathématiques (pp. 201–216). Rennes, France: Presses Universitaires de Rennes et INRP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. T., & Bryans, M. B. (2004). Teachers’ orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 352–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. T., Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., & Lloyd, G. M. (Eds.). (2009). Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, L. M. (1980). What facts does this poem teach you? Language Arts, 57(4), 386–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, L. M. (1982). The literary transaction: Evocation and response. Theory into Practice, 21(4), 268–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, R., & Krajcik, J. (2002). Supporting science teacher learning: The role of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(3), 221–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherin, M. G., & Drake, C. (2009). Curriculum strategy framework: Investigating patterns in teachers’ use of a reform-based elementary mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(4), 467–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., & Kim, G. (2009). The role of mathematics curriculum materials in large-scale urban reform: An analysis of demands and opportunities for teacher learning. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 37–55). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • TERC. (1998). Investigations in numbers, data, and space. Menlo Park, CA: Dale Seymour.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartofsky, M. (1973). Models. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to the insightful and substantive feedback provided by Carolyn Kieran and the three editors of this volume. This chapter develops concepts and analyzes presented in several earlier publications (Remillard, 1999, 2010; Remillard & Bryans, 2004). This research described within was funded by the National Science Foundation (Grant nos. REC-9875739; ESI-9153834) and the Pew Charitable Trust (Grant no. 91-0434-000). The views expressed within are those of the authors and are not necessarily shared by the grantors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janine T. Remillard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Remillard, J.T. (2011). Modes of Engagement: Understanding Teachers’ Transactions with Mathematics Curriculum Resources. In: Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., Trouche, L. (eds) From Text to 'Lived' Resources. Mathematics Teacher Education, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1966-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics