Abstract
Drawing on research on elementary teachers in the United States, this chapter explores and theorizes the relationships that teachers develop with curriculum resources as they use them. The central argument is that teachers are positioned by and through their encounters with curriculum materials as particular kinds of users of them. The chapter examines modes of address in curriculum resources and modes of engagement taken up by teachers to illustrate how this positioning happens, including how teachers participate in it through their epistemological stances and orientations. Modes of address are experienced through various forms found in curriculum resource, including structure, look, voice, medium, and genre. Modes of engagement are seen in forms of teacher reading, including what the teacher reads for, which parts she reads, when she reads, and who she is as a reader. Four examples of teachers engaging with a curriculum resource designed to reflect the NCTM Standards are used to illustrate how modes and forms of address interact.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Even though they were not designed by commercial publishers, the Standards-based curriculum programs are published and marketed by commercial publishers.
- 2.
It is worth noting that the second edition of the Investigations (TERC, 2008) has a physical appearance more in line with conventional mathematics teacher’s guides than the first edition, although it continues to be organized in modules.
- 3.
The Investigations curriculum is described in more detail in Section 6.6.
References
Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualising resources as a theme for teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 205–224.
Brown, M. W. (2009). The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction, (pp. 17–36). New York: Routledge.
Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Collopy, R. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers’ learning. Elementary School Journal, 103(3), 287.
Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.
Drake, C., & Sherin, M.G. (2009). Developing curriculum vision and trust: Changes in teachers’ curriculum strategies. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 321–337). New York: Routledge.
Ellsworth, E. (1997). Teaching positions: Difference, pedagogy, and the power of address. New York: Teachers College.
Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2009).Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 199–218.
Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2010). Des ressources aux documents, travail du professeur et genèses documentaires. (From resources to documents, teacher’s work and documentational geneses). In G. Gueudet & L. Trouche (Eds.), Ressources vives. Le travail documentaire des professeurs en mathématiques (pp. 57–74). Rennes, France: Presses Universitaires de Rennes et INRP.
Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). Positioning theory. Oxford, MA: Blackwell.
Lloyd, G. M. (1999). Two teachers’ conceptions of a reform-oriented curriculum: Implications for mathematics teacher development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(3), 227–252.
Love, E., & Pimm, D. (1996). ‘this is so’: A text on texts. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics, part 1 (pp. 371–409). Boston: Kluwer.
Margolinas, C., & Wozniak, F. (2010). Rôle de la documentation scolaire dans la situation du professeur: le cas de l’enseignement des mathématiques à l’école élémentaire (Role of teaching documentation inthe teacher’s situation: the case of mathematics at elementary school). InG. Gueudet & L. Trouche (Eds.), Ressources vives. Le travail documentaire des professeurs en mathématiques (pp. 183–199). Rennes, France: Presses Universitaires de Rennes et INRP.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1989). The curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
NCTM. (2000). The principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Ongstad, S. (2006). Mathematics and mathematics education as triadic communication? A semiotic framework exemplified. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 247–277.
Otte, M. (1986). What is a text? In B. Christiansen, A. G. Howson, M. Otte (Eds.), Perspectives on math education (pp. 173–202). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Pea, R. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47–87). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Remillard, J. T. (1991). Abdicating authority for knowing: A teacher’s use of an innovative mathematics curriculum. (Elementary Subjects Center Series No. 42). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching, Center for the Learning and Teaching of Elementary Subjects.
Remillard, J. T. (1996). Changing texts, teachers, and teaching: The role of textbooks in reform in mathematics education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Remillard, J. T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers’ curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 315–342.
Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers’ learning? Two fourth grade teachers’ use of new mathematics text. Elementary School Journal, 100, 331–350.
Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts of research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
Remillard, J. T. (2010). Modes d’engagement: Comprendre les transactions des professeurs avec les ressources curriculaires en mathématiques (Modes of engagement: Understanding teachers’ transactions with mathematics curriculum resources). In G. Gueudet & L. Trouche (Eds.), Ressources vives, le travail documentaire des professeurs, le cas des mathématiques (pp. 201–216). Rennes, France: Presses Universitaires de Rennes et INRP.
Remillard, J. T., & Bryans, M. B. (2004). Teachers’ orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 352–388.
Remillard, J. T., Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., & Lloyd, G. M. (Eds.). (2009). Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction. New York: Routledge.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1980). What facts does this poem teach you? Language Arts, 57(4), 386–394.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1982). The literary transaction: Evocation and response. Theory into Practice, 21(4), 268–277.
Schneider, R., & Krajcik, J. (2002). Supporting science teacher learning: The role of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(3), 221–245.
Sherin, M. G., & Drake, C. (2009). Curriculum strategy framework: Investigating patterns in teachers’ use of a reform-based elementary mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(4), 467–500.
Stein, M. K., & Kim, G. (2009). The role of mathematics curriculum materials in large-scale urban reform: An analysis of demands and opportunities for teacher learning. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 37–55). New York: Routledge.
TERC. (1998). Investigations in numbers, data, and space. Menlo Park, CA: Dale Seymour.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wartofsky, M. (1973). Models. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful to the insightful and substantive feedback provided by Carolyn Kieran and the three editors of this volume. This chapter develops concepts and analyzes presented in several earlier publications (Remillard, 1999, 2010; Remillard & Bryans, 2004). This research described within was funded by the National Science Foundation (Grant nos. REC-9875739; ESI-9153834) and the Pew Charitable Trust (Grant no. 91-0434-000). The views expressed within are those of the authors and are not necessarily shared by the grantors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Remillard, J.T. (2011). Modes of Engagement: Understanding Teachers’ Transactions with Mathematics Curriculum Resources. In: Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., Trouche, L. (eds) From Text to 'Lived' Resources. Mathematics Teacher Education, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1966-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1966-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1965-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1966-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)