Abstract
In the constructivist literature on student knowing in science and mathematics, what students say and do in classrooms and interviews is said to be the result of their conceptions. These conceptions are thought to be “mental models” and “internal representations” that are the outcome of constructive work. But does this have to be the case? Do students have to have conceptions when they talk about certain topics? Moreover, if we were to accept that there are mental models driving what someone says at some point, how would talk look like when a learner is between two mental models? In this chapter, I draw on interview data to show that people do actively participate in conversations without ever having thought or talked about a topic before, which means, that they could not have constructed a mental model. Rather, by participating in conversations, children learn to speak—without having to learn grammar, without having to learn conceptions—and from the way language is used, answers to questions can be derived even without prior knowledge-building processes to have occurred. I develop a position grounded in Bakhtin (Vološinov), Heidegger, and Derrida.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roth, WM. (2011). Talking Conceptions Without Conceptions. In: Passibility. Classics in Science Education, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1908-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1908-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1907-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1908-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)