Skip to main content

Comparison of Water Footprint for Industrial Products in Japan, China and USA

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Management
  • 4070 Accesses

Abstract

Recently, water scarcity has received attention. With the development of industries and the growth of population, the amount of water use has increased. In order to evaluate the water use of industrial products, the method of estimating water footprint (WF) has been developed. WF is defined as the amount of water use during the lifecycle of products or services. In this study, we estimated WF of industrial products in Japan, China, and the U.S. using input-output analysis. It was found that WF for BOF crude steel in Japan was estimated as 0.62 m3/t, whereas WF for EAF crude steel in Japan was estimated as 0.85 m3/t. WF of crude steel in China was estimated as 0.99 m3/t. In the U.S. the pig iron, crude steel and ferroalloy cannot be divided into each sector, so we cannot compare the results of the U.S. to those of Japan and China. In WF for a passenger car, the indirect water use dominated their WF in all countries. To compare the results in each sector between countries appropriately, consistency of industrial sector in the data for water use is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. <http://hydro.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/Info/Press200905/. >(accessed11.06.2010)

  2. Zhao X, Chen B, Yang ZF (2002) National water footprint in an inputoutput framework – A case study of China 2002. Ecol Modell 220:245-253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blackhurst M, Hendrickson C, Sels i Vidal J (2010) Direct and Indirect Water Withdrawals for US Industrial Sectors. Environ Sci Technol 44(6):2126-2130.

    Google Scholar 

  4. <http://www.meti.go.jp/statistics/tyo/kougyo/result-2.html.> (accessed 02.07. 2010)

  5. <http://www.e-tat.go.jp/SG1/estat/List.do?bid=000001019588cycode=0.> (accessed 18.06. 2010)

  6. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (2009) the Input-Output Tables in 2005 Data Report (2). Research institute of economy, trade and industry

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhenhua X (2008) China Circular Economic Yearbook 2008. China Financial Economic Publishing House

    Google Scholar 

  8. National Bureau of Statistics National Development and Reform Committee (2009) Input- Output tables of China, China Statistic Press

    Google Scholar 

  9. <http://water.usgs.gov/watuse/data/2000/index.html.> (accessed 02.12.2010)

  10. <http://www.bea.gov/industry/io_benchmark.htm.> (accessed 02.12.2010)

  11. <http://www.jisf.or.jp/data/iisi/index.html.> (accessed 05.02.2010)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sadataka Horie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Horie, S., Daigo, I., Matsuno, Y., Adachi, Y. (2011). Comparison of Water Footprint for Industrial Products in Japan, China and USA. In: Finkbeiner, M. (eds) Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Management. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1899-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics