Abstract
Rural Demography in the United States is faced with a number of unique challenges. In this chapter we summarize some of the most important of these. We first concentrate on the issues related to the definition of what is rural both conceptually and empirically arguing that many of the challenges involve issues related to what “rural” is and where it is; that is, how its geography is linked to its populations. We then examine the unique problems created by the small population sizes in rural areas using four areas of analysis as examples of the challenges related to defining rurality and spatially locating rural areas. The four areas examined represent critical areas of analysis in both the measurement of demographic change in rural areas and in two areas where rurality has come to form a major differentiator of conditions and outcomes. We first examine the analysis of rates of fertility, mortality, and migration in sparsely settled areas. These basic demographic processes, essential to the understanding of demographic change in any area, pose unique problems for their analysis in rural settings. Similarly, the second example, the analysis of the estimation and projection of demographic processes, involves analysis and methods that require unique approaches in their projection in rural areas. Analysis in the third example area, the examination of the prevalence and incidence of diseases and disorders in rural areas, has faced similarly challenging issues related to obtaining sufficient data to delineate areas with uniquely high and low disease prevalence and incidence. Finally, large-scale environmental and other developments in rural areas often create problems that would not occur in more urban settings where resources to handle such developments are more developed. The analysis involved in establishing the population-related impacts of large-scale environmental and industrial projects in rural areas is of critical importance, if they are to be adequately mitigated. In the final part of this chapter we discuss the potential created by recently developed techniques to both operationalize and integrate the key dimensions of rurality and to link these dimensions with given pieces of geography. We believe that such techniques will help to ensure the homogeneity of areas being compared and help identify the dimensions of rurality that create demographic differences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albrecht, D. E., & Albrecht, C. M. (2004). Metro/nonmetro residence, nonmarital conception, and conception outcomes. Rural Sociology, 69(3), 430–452.
Arcury, T. A., Williams, B. J., & Kryscio, R. J. (1990). Birth seasonality in a rural county, 1911–1979. American Journal of Human Biology, 2, 675–689.
Beale, C. L. (1975). The revival of widespread population growth in nonmetropolitan America. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture.
Beale, C. L., & Johnson, K. M. (1998). The identification of recreational counties in nonmetropolitan areas of the United States. Population Research and Policy Review, 17, 37–53.
Bernard, J. (1955). Social psychological aspects of community study. British Journal of Sociology, 2(March), 12–30.
Brown, D., & Swanson, L. (2003). Challenges for rural America in the twenty-first century. University Park: Pennsylvania State University.
Bunce, M. (1982). Rural settlement in an urban world. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Butler, M., & Beale, C. (1994 and revised 2003). Rural-urban continuum codes for metro and nonmetro counties. Washington, DC: U.S. Economic Research Service.
Carsey Institute. (2010). Community and environment in rural America (CERA) survey. Durham, NH: Author.
Cook, P., & Mizer, K. (1994 and revised 2003). The revised EPS county typology: An overview. Washington, DC: U.S. Economic Research Service.
Duncan, O. D., & Reiss, A. J., Jr. (1956). Social characteristics of urban and rural communities. New York: Wiley.
Farmer, F. L. (2008). The definition of rural. In G. Goreham (Ed.), Encyclopedia of rural America (2nd ed., pp. 833–835). Millerton, NY: Greyhouse Publishing.
Ford, T. (1999). Understanding population growth in the peri-urban region. International Journal of Population Geography, 5, 197–311.
Frey, W. H. (1987). Migration and depopulation of the metropolis: Regional restructuring or rural renaissance? American Sociological Review, 52(2), 240–257.
Fuguitt, G. V., & Brown, D. L. (1990). Residential preferences and population redistribution: 1972–1988. Demography, 27(4), 589–600.
Fuguitt, G. V., Brown, D. L., & Beale, C. L. (1989). Rural and small town America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Fuguitt, G. V., Heaton, T. B., & Lichter, D. T. (1988). Monitoring the metropolization process. Demography, 25(1), 115–128.
Ghelfi, L., & Parker, T. (1997). A county level measurement of urban influence. Rural Development Perspectives, 12(2).
Ghelfi, L., & Parker, T. (2003). Measuring rurality: Urban influence codes (pp. 32–40). Washington, DC: U.S. Economic Research Service.
Hawley, A. H. (1950). Human ecology: A theory of community structure. New York: Ronald Press.
Hawley, A. H. (1986). Human ecology: A theoretical essay. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayward, M. D., & Gorman, B. K. (2004). The long arm of childhood: The influence of early-life social conditions on men’s mortality. Demography, 41(1), 87–107.
Heaton, T. B., Lichter, D. T., & Amoateng, A. (1989). The timing of family formation: Rural-urban differentials in first intercourse, childbirth, and marriage. Rural Sociology, 54(1), 1–16.
Hoque, N., McCusker, M. E., Murdock, S. H., & Perez, D. (2010). The implications of change in population size, distribution, and composition on the number of overweight and obese adults and the direct and indirect cost associated with overweight and obese adults in Texas through 2040. Population Research and Policy Review, 29(2), 173–191.
Hugo, G., Champion, A., & Lattes, A. (2003). Toward a new conceptualization of settlements for demography. Population and Development Review, 29(2), 277–297.
Isserman, A. M. (2005). In the national interest: Defining rural and urban correctly in research and public policy. International Regional Science Review, 28(4), 465–499.
Johnson, K. M., & Fuguitt, G. V. (2000). Continuity and change in rural migration patterns, 1950–1995. Rural Sociology, 65(1), 27–49.
Johnson, K. M., Voss, P. R., Hammer, R. B., Fuguitt, G. V., & McNiven, S. (2005). Temporal and spatial variation in age-specific net migration in the United States. Demography, 42(4), 791–812.
Johnson, N. E., & Keppel, K. G. (1986). The effect of fertility on migration. Rural Sociology, 51(2), 212–221.
Kaufman, H. (1959). Toward an interactional conception of community. Social Forces, 38(October), 9–17.
Kraenzel, C. (1980). The social cost of space in Yonland. Bozeman, MT: Big Sky Press.
Lamb, V. L., & Siegel, J. S. (2004). Health demography. In J. S. Siegel & D. A. Swanson (Eds.), The methods and materials of demography (pp. 341–370). Boston: Elsevier Science.
Leistritz, F. L., & Murdock, S. H. (1981). The socioeconomic impacts of resource development: Methods for assessment. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Lichter, D. T., & Johnson, K. M. (2000). Continuity and change in rural migration patterns, 1950–1995. Rural Sociology, 65(1), 27–49.
Lichter, D. T., & Johnson, K. M. (2006). Emerging rural settlement patterns and the geographic redistribution of America’s new immigrants. Rural Sociology, 71(1), 109–131.
Long, L., & DeAre, D. (1988). US population redistribution: A perspective on the nonmetropolitan turnaround. Population and Development Review, 14(3), 433–450.
McGehee, M. A., Hall, S. D., & Murdock, S. H. (2004). Rural and urban death rates by race/ethnicity and gender, Texas: 1990–2000. The Journal of Multicultural Nursing and Health, 10(2), 13–22.
McKibben, J. N., & Faust, K. A. (2004). Population distribution: Classification of residence. In J. S. Siegel & D. A. Swanson (Eds.), The methods and materials of demography (2nd ed., p. 819). Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.
Murdock, S., & Ellis, D. R. (1991). Applied demography: An introduction to basic concepts, methods, and data. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Murdock, S., Hamm, R. R., Voss, P. R., Fannin, D., & Pecotte, B. (1991). Evaluating small-area population projections. Journal of the American Planning Association, 57, 432–443.
Murdock, S., Hoque, M. N., Johnson, K., & McGehee, M. (2003). Racial/ethnic diversification in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan population change in the United States: Implications for health care provision in rural America. The Journal of Rural Health, 19(4), 425–432.
Murdock, S., Hoque, M. N., & McGehee, M. (2005). Population change in the United States: Implications of an aging and diversifying population for health care in the 21st century. In T. Miles & A. Forino (Eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics: Aging healthcare workforce issues (Vol. 25, pp. 19–63). New York: Springer.
Murdock, S., Kelley, C., Jordan, J., Pecotte, B., & Luedke, A. (2006). Demographics: A guide to methods and data sources for media, Business, and government. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Murdock, S., Krannich, R. S., Leistritz, F. L., Spies, S., Wulfhorst, J. D., Wrigley, K., et al. (1999). Hazardous wastes in rural America: Impacts, implications and options for rural communities. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Murdock, S., & Leistritz, F. L. (1979). Energy development in the western United States: Impact on rural areas. New York: Praeger Publishers.
Murdock, S., & Sutton, W., Jr. (1974). The new ecology and community theory: Similarities, differences, and convergencies. Rural Sociology, 39(3), 319–333.
Murdock, S., & Swanson, D. A. (Eds.). (2008). Applied demography in the twenty-first century. Berlin: Springer.
Pol, L. G., & Thomas, R. K. (1992). The demography of health and health care. New York: Plenum Press.
Porter, J. R., & Howell, F. M. (2008). On the ‘urbanness’ of metropolitan areas: Testing the homogeneity assumption, 1970–2000. Population Research and Policy Review, 28, 589–613.
Shyrock, H. S., & Siegel, J. S. (1976). The methods and materials of demography. New York: Academic.
Siegel, J. (2002). Applied demography: Applications to business, government, law, and public policy. San Diego, CA: Academic.
Siegel, J., & Swanson, D. (2004). The methods and materials of demography (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.
Smith, S., & Shahidullah, M. (1995). An evaluation of population projection errors for Census tracts. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 64–71.
Smith, S., Tayman, J., & Swanson, D. (2001). State and local population projections: Methods and analysis. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Taylor, J. E., & Martin, P. L. (1997). The immigrant subsidy in US agriculture: Farm employment, poverty, and welfare. Population and Development Review, 23(4), 855–874.
Tolnay, S. E. (1987). The decline of black marital fertility in the rural South: 1910–1940. American Sociological Review, 52(April), 211–217.
United Nations. (2009). Demographic yearbook: 2007. New York: United Nations Press.
U.S. Census Bureau. (1949). The development of the urban-rural classification system in the United States: 1874–1949. Series P23-1. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2002). Urban area criteria for Census 2000. Federal Register, 67(51), 11663–11670.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). American Community Survey: Design and methodology. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
U.S. Economic Research Service. (2003). Rural-urban continuum codes. United Sates Department of Agriculture. Retrieved April 8, 2010, from http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/ruralurbancontinuumcodes/
U.S. Economic Research Service. (2004). Measuring rurality: 2004 county typology codes. United Sates Department of Agriculture. Retrieved April 8, 2010, from http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/rurality/typology
U.S. Office of Management and Budget. (2000). Standards for defining metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas. Federal Register, 65(249), 82228–82238.
Voss, P. (2000). Rural areas. In M. Anderson (Ed.), The encyclopedia of the United States census (pp. 320–322). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Voss, P. (2007). Demography as a spatial social science. Population Research and Policy Review, 26(5), 457–476.
Warren, R. (1972). The community in America. Chicago: Rand McNally.
White, K. J. C. (2008). Population change and farm dependence: Temporal and spatial variation in the U.S. Great Plains, 1900–2000. Demography, 45(2), 363–386.
Wilkinson, K. P. (1991). The rural-urban variable in community research. In K. P. Wilkinson (Ed.), The community in rural America (pp. 37–59). Middleton, WS: Social Ecology Press.
Woods, M. (2009). Rural geography: Blurring boundaries and making connections. Progress in Human Geography, 33(6), 849–858.
Woods, R. (2003). Urban-rural mortality differentials: An unresolved debate. Population and Development Review, 29(1), 29–46.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Murdock, S.H., Cline, M., Zey, M. (2012). Challenges in the Analysis of Rural Populations in the United States. In: Kulcsár, L., Curtis, K. (eds) International Handbook of Rural Demography. International Handbooks of Population, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1842-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1842-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1841-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1842-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)