Skip to main content

Evolution Education from Campus to Home

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Evolution and Religion in American Education

Part of the book series: Cultural Studies of Science Education ((CSSE,volume 4))

  • 661 Accesses

Abstract

Returning to student experiences, Chap. 7 details a thematic analysis of student social perspectives and educational histories regarding evolution. Working us toward a richer description of what the normative case of American evolution education might look like, I present both a muted but also tension-filled picture, along with some odd extremes. Students describe educational histories where more than half recall evolution being omitted, or discussed in one class or less during the entirety of their K-12 education. When it was discussed, students recall teachers specially qualifying the topic as something only to be learned for the state test, with some schools sending permission slips home before the evolution lesson. Creationist students describe their experience at feeling “closeted,” in that they feel they cannot discuss their actual thoughts regarding evolution. Non-Creationist students discuss the impact of what they describe as “very religious people,” those they feel have issue with evolution in the curriculum.

From this, I connect the discourse of campus outreach to the politics within schools. Student’s histories are illustrated by sharing the views about evolution held by going back to their communities and interviewing their past science teachers. Reading across teacher experiences, in some cases current evolution educational practices are at best barely getting the job done, and at worst likely in violation of established law. Additionally, I explore the evangelical Christian homeschooling movement in an interview with one student’s past homeschool science teacher. In summary comment, from demographic information collected from students, teachers, and college faculty, the relationship between receptivity toward evolution and political affiliation is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bloom, H. (1992). The American religion: The emergence of the post-Christian nation. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (2006). The God delusion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (2006). Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgell, P., Gerteis, J., & Hartmann, D. (2006). Atheists as “other”: Moral boundaries and cultural membership in American society. American Sociological Review, 71(2), 211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. (2005). Briefings – academic cross dressing. How intelligent design gets its arguments from the left. Harper’s. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. (2006). Letter to a Christian nation. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchens, C. (2007). God is not great: How religion poisons everything. New York: Twelve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, C. (2005). The Republican war on science. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, H. M. (1974). Scientific creationism. San Diego: Creation-Life.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, J. B. (1994). Union in truth: An interpretive history of the Restoration movement. Cincinnati: Standard Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. (2010). US religious knowledge survey. Washington, DC: Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Foundation (2008). U.S. religious landscape survey. Retrieved from: http://religions.pewforum.org/pdf/report-religious-landscape-study-full.pdf

  • Roman Catholic Church (1996). Magisterium is concerned with question of evolution for it involves conception of man. Pope John Paul II. Message to Pontifical Academy of Sciences, October 22, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toumey, C. P. (1994). God’s own scientists: Creationists in a secular world. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wile, J. D. (2000). Exploring creation with biology. Michigan: Apologia Educational Ministries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. (2005). America and the challenges of religious diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. (2009). No contradictions here: Science religion and the culture or all reasonable possibilities. In H. W. Attridge & R. L. Numbers (Eds.), The religion and science debate: Why does it continue? New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David E. Long .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Long, D.E. (2011). Evolution Education from Campus to Home. In: Evolution and Religion in American Education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1808-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics