Skip to main content
Book cover

Climate pp 133–155Cite as

Risk Management Practices

Cross-Agency Comparisons and Tolerable Risk

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1934 Accesses

Abstract

The inevitable public unease in the wake of large infrastructure failure prompts questions regarding how to properly define and manage the risks of various engineered activities to socially acceptable levels. A changing climate may add additional vulnerability to infrastructure and thus should be considered in risk management strategies. Current implementations of risk management processes differ across public agencies, but often rely on a concept of Tolerable Risk. Tolerable Risk is a numerical value for the boundary—in a continuum of management alternatives—below which risk is tolerated to secure societal benefits, though engineering interventions may be still be necessary and proper to achieve higher degrees of protection. This chapter gives an overview of risk management and introduces the Tolerable Risk framework, reviews and summarizes risk management frameworks for several federal and foreign agencies, and recommends key features and necessary steps for a Tolerable Risk framework implementation. The ideas in this chapter draw extensively from a March 2008 interagency workshop on Tolerable Risk sponsored by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and attended by several additional federal and foreign agencies [33].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aven T, Vinnem JE (2005) On the use of risk acceptance criteria in the offshore oil and gas industry. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 90:15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Azevedo A (2008, March 19) FAA aviation safety tolerable risk principles. Tolerable risk workshop. http://www.usbr.gov/ssle/damsafety/jointventures/tolerablerisk/19Azevedo.pdf

  3. Bouder F, Slavin D, Lofstedt RE (2007) The tolerability of risk: a new framework for risk management. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bowles DS (2003) ALARP evaluation: using cost effectiveness and disproportionality to ­justify risk reduction. In: Proceedings of the Australian Committee on Large Dams Risk Workshop, Launceston. http://uwrl.usu.edu/people/faculty/DSB/alarp.pdf

  5. Cyganiewicz JM, Smart JD (2000, September 19–22) U.S. Bureau of reclamation’s use of risk analysis and risk assessment in dam safety decision making. In: Proceedings of the 20th ICOLD Congress, Beijing, pp 351–369. http://www.usbr.gov/ssle/damsafety/Risk/riskicold.pdf

  6. Daemmrich A, Radin J (2007) Perspectives on risk and regulation: the FDA at 100. Chemical Heritage Foundation, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  7. Det Norske Veritas (2007) Oljeindustriens Landsforening: Metode for Miljørettet Risikoanalyse (Oil industry association: methodology for environmental risk analysis) (MIRA). (Revision Apr 2007). Det Norske Veritas AS, Hovik

    Google Scholar 

  8. Det Norske Veritas (2010) Report: OLF/NOFO—summary of differences between offshore drilling regulations in Norway and U.S. Gulf of Mexico. (Revision 02, 26 Aug 2010). Det Norske Veritas AS, Hovik

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dezfuli H (2008, March 19) Achieving a holistic and risk-informed decision-making process at NASA. Tolerable risk workshop. http://www.usbr.gov/ssle/damsafety/jointventures/tolerablerisk/21Dezfuli.pdf

  10. Dezfuli H, Youngblood R, Reinert J (2007, May 14–16) Managing risk within a decision analysis framework. In: Second IAASS conference, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  11. Farley D (1995, January) Benefit vs. risk: how FDA approves new drugs. FDA consumer special report on new drug development in the U.S. http://www.mdadvice.com/resources/clinical_trials/fda.htm

  12. International Organization for Standardization (2009) ISO 31000:2009: risk management—principles and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. http://www.iso.org

  13. Kelly K (1991, June 16–21) The myth of 10–6 as a definitive acceptable risk. Presented at 84th annual meeting Air and Waste Management Association, Vancouver. http://www.heartland.org/custom/semod_policybot/pdf/17603.pdf

  14. Kuzmack AM, McGaughy RE (1975) Quantitative risk assessment for community exposure to vinyl chloride. Office of Research and Development, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  15. Long MW, Narciso JE (1999, June) Probabilistic design methodology for composite aircraft structures, DOT/FAA/AT-99/2. Office of Aviation Research, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington. http://www.tc.faa.gov/its/worldpac/techrpt/ar99-2.pdf

  16. Melchers RE (2001) On the ALARP approach to risk management. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 71(2):201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Merrill RA (1988) FDA’s implementation of the Delaney clause: repudiation of congressional choice or reasoned adaptation to scientific progress? Yale J Regul 5(1):1–88

    Google Scholar 

  18. Monninger J (2008, March 19) Development and use of risk information to support decision-making at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Tolerable risk workshop. http://www.usbr.gov/ssle/damsafety/jointventures/tolerablerisk/16Monninger.pdf

  19. Morgan MG, Henrion M (1990) Uncertainty. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Muller B (2008, March 18–19) Dam safety—managing risk. Tolerable risk workshop. http://www.usbr.gov/ssle/damsafety/jointventures/tolerablerisk/11Muller.pdf

  21. Munger DF, Bowles DS, Boyer DD, Davis DW, Margo DA, Moser DA, Regan PJ, Snorteland N (2009, April 20–24) Interim tolerable risk guidelines for US Army Corps of Engineers Dams. Managing our water retention systems. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual U.S. Society on Dams conference, pp 1125–1141. http://ussdams.com/proceedings/2009Proc/1125-1142.pdf

  22. National Research Council (1983) Risk assessment in the federal government: managing the process. National Academy Press, Washington. http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?­isbn=0309033497

  23. Norwegian Government (2003, June 20) Pollution control act: act of 13 Mar 1981 No. 6 concerning protection against pollution and concerning waste. Norwegian Government, information from the government and the ministries. http://www.regjeringen.no/en/doc/Laws/Acts/Pollution-Control-Act.html

  24. Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (2009, May 15) History. http://www.npd.no/en/About-us/Organisation/History/

  25. Norwegian Technological Standards Institution (2001, September 01) NORSOK Standard Z-103: Risk and emergency preparedness analysis, (rev. 2). Norwegian Technology Centre, Oslo. http://www.standard.no/PageFiles/955/Z-013.pdf

  26. Nuclear Energy Institute (2007, July) Regulatory assessment performance indicator guideline, NEI 99–02 Revision 5. Nuclear Energy Institute, Washington, DC. http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/nei_9902rev5.pdf

  27. Paté-Cornell E (2002) Risk and uncertainty analysis in government safety decisions. Risk Anal 22(3):633–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Repcheck JR (2009, January) FAA’s implementation of the commercial space launch amendments act of 2004—The experimental permit. Office of Commercial Space Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC. http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/reports_studies/media/FAA%20Experimental%20Permit%20IAASS.pdf

  29. Shaw SJ (1992) Use of risk assessment as an offshore design tool. J Loss Prev Process Ind 5(1):10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Singsaas I, Rye H, Frost TK, Mathijs GDS, Garpestad E, Skare I, Bakke K, Falcao Veiga L, Buffagini M, Follum OA, Johnsen S, Moltu UE, Reed M (2008) Development of a risk-based environmental management tool for drilling discharges: summary of a four-year project. Integr Environ Assess Manage 4(2):171–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Society for Risk Analysis (2010, September 1) Risk analysis glossary: P–R. http://www.sra.org/resources_glossary_p-r.php

  32. Stamatelatos M (2008, April 14–16) NASA integrated risk management process. In: TRISMAC Conference, Noordwijk, The Netherlands. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/codeq/trismac/apr08/day2/Stamatelatos_NASA_HQ.pdf

  33. Tolerable Risk Workshop (2008) Alexandria, VA, 18–19 Mar 2008. http://www.usbr.gov/ssle/damsafety/jointventures/tolerablerisk/

  34. Travis CC, Richter SA, Crouch EAC, Wilson R, Klema ED (1987) Cancer risk management: a review of 132 federal regulatory decisions. Environ Sci Technol 21(5):415–420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2008, April 29) Workshop on tolerable risk evaluation: a step towards developing tolerable risk guidelines for dams and levees—summary white paper. http://www.usbr.gov/ssle/damsafety/jointventures/tolerablerisk/TRWorkshoppresentation-080429.pdf

  36. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (2003, June 15) Guidelines for achieving public protection in dam safety decision making. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Denver. http://www.usbr.gov/ssle/damsafety/Risk/ppg2003.pdf

  37. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (2010, November 5) Bureau of reclamation—facts and information. http://www.usbr.gov/main/about/fact.html

  38. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1991, April 22) Memorandum: role of the baseline risk assessment in superfund remedy selection decisions, OSWER Directive 9355.0-30. http://www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/pdf/baseline.pdf

  39. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1993, March 15) Reference dose (RfD): description and use in health risk assessments. http://www.epa.gov/iris/rfd.htm

  40. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1997, June) Ecological risk assessment guidance for superfund: process for designing and conducting ecological risk assessments—interim final, EPA 540-R-97-006. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/ecorisk/ecorisk.htm

  41. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1997, August 22) Memorandum: establishment of cleanup levels for CERCLA sites with radioactive contamination, OSWER Directive 9200.4-18. http://epa.gov/superfund/health/contaminants/radiation/pdfs/radguide.pdf

  42. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000) Methodology for deriving ambient water quality criteria for the protection of human health, EPA-822-B-00-004. Office of Science and Technology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington. http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/waterquality/standards/upload/2005_05_06_criteria_humanhealth_method_complete.pdf

  43. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2004) An examination of EPA risk assessment principles and practices, EPA-100-B-04-001. Office of the Science Advisor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/osa/pdfs/ratf-final.pdf

  44. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2010, August 19) The history of risk at EPA. http://www.epa.gov/risk/history.htm

  45. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2010, June 07) Asbestos Ban and phase out. http://www.epa.gov/asbestos/pubs/ban.html

  46. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (2000, August 30) Expected casualty calculations for commercial space launch and reentry missions, AC 431.35-1. http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/licenses_permits/media/Ac4311fn.pdf

  47. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (2008, May 21) System safety handbook. http://www.faa.gov/library/manuals/aviation/risk_management/ss_handbook/

  48. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (1979, March 20) Chemical compounds in food-producing animals: criteria and procedures for evaluating assays for carcinogenic residues, Federal register 44, 17070–17114.

    Google Scholar 

  49. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2000, March 3) Precaution in U.S. food safety decision making: annex II to the U.S.’ National Food Safety System Paper. http://www.foodsafety.gov/~fsg/fssyst4.html

  50. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2005) Guidance for industry: development and use of risk minimization action plans. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United Stated Food and Drug Administration, Rockville. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM126830.pdf

  51. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2005, September 5) Risk management plan activities in OND and ODS, MAPP 6700.1. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDER/ManualofPoliciesProcedures/ucm082058.pdf

  52. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2009, May 11) Grade “A” pasteurized milk ordinance (2007 Revision). http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/Product-SpecificInformation/Milk­Safety/NationalConferenceonInterstateMilkShipmentsNCIMSModelDocuments/PasteurizedMilkOrdinance2007/default.htm

  53. U.S. National Aeronautical and Space Administration (1987, June) Implementation of the recommendations of the presidential commission on the space shuttle challenger accident. http://history.nasa.gov/rogersrep/v6index.htm

  54. U.S. National Aeronautical and Space Administration (2008, December 16) Agency risk management procedural requirements. http://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/displayDir.cfm?Internal_ID=N_PR_8000_004A_andpage_name=mainandsearch_term=Risk%20Management%20Procedural%20Requirements

  55. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1986, August 21) Safety goals for the operations of nuclear power plants, policy statement 51, Federal Register 30028

    Google Scholar 

  56. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2005, April 21) NRC news: $5,450,000 fine for Davis-Besse reactor vessel head violations. http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2005/05-070.html

  57. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2010, October 20) History of the NRC’s risk-informed regulatory programs. http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/risk-informed/history.html

  58. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2011, January 3) Risk-informed and performance-based plan (RPP) (2007-Present). http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/risk-informed/history/2007-present.html

  59. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2011, January 3) Risk-informed regulation implementation plan (RIRIP) (2000–2007). http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/risk-informed/history/2000-2007.html

  60. United Kingdom Health and Safety Executive (1992) The tolerability of risk from nuclear power stations. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London. http://www.hse.gov.uk/nuclear/tolerability.pdf

  61. United Kingdom Health and Safety Executive (2001) Reducing risks, protecting people. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, Norwich. http://www.hse.gov.uk/risk/theory/r2p2.pdf

  62. Vinnem JE (2007) Offshore risk assessment: principles, modelling, and applications of QRA studies, 2nd edn. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Linkov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Linkov, I., Bates, M., Loney, D., Sparrevik, M., Bridges, T. (2011). Risk Management Practices. In: Linkov, I., Bridges, T. (eds) Climate. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1770-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics