Abstract
The inevitable public unease in the wake of large infrastructure failure prompts questions regarding how to properly define and manage the risks of various engineered activities to socially acceptable levels. A changing climate may add additional vulnerability to infrastructure and thus should be considered in risk management strategies. Current implementations of risk management processes differ across public agencies, but often rely on a concept of Tolerable Risk. Tolerable Risk is a numerical value for the boundary—in a continuum of management alternatives—below which risk is tolerated to secure societal benefits, though engineering interventions may be still be necessary and proper to achieve higher degrees of protection. This chapter gives an overview of risk management and introduces the Tolerable Risk framework, reviews and summarizes risk management frameworks for several federal and foreign agencies, and recommends key features and necessary steps for a Tolerable Risk framework implementation. The ideas in this chapter draw extensively from a March 2008 interagency workshop on Tolerable Risk sponsored by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and attended by several additional federal and foreign agencies [33].
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aven T, Vinnem JE (2005) On the use of risk acceptance criteria in the offshore oil and gas industry. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 90:15–24
Azevedo A (2008, March 19) FAA aviation safety tolerable risk principles. Tolerable risk workshop. http://www.usbr.gov/ssle/damsafety/jointventures/tolerablerisk/19Azevedo.pdf
Bouder F, Slavin D, Lofstedt RE (2007) The tolerability of risk: a new framework for risk management. Earthscan, London
Bowles DS (2003) ALARP evaluation: using cost effectiveness and disproportionality to justify risk reduction. In: Proceedings of the Australian Committee on Large Dams Risk Workshop, Launceston. http://uwrl.usu.edu/people/faculty/DSB/alarp.pdf
Cyganiewicz JM, Smart JD (2000, September 19–22) U.S. Bureau of reclamation’s use of risk analysis and risk assessment in dam safety decision making. In: Proceedings of the 20th ICOLD Congress, Beijing, pp 351–369. http://www.usbr.gov/ssle/damsafety/Risk/riskicold.pdf
Daemmrich A, Radin J (2007) Perspectives on risk and regulation: the FDA at 100. Chemical Heritage Foundation, Philadelphia
Det Norske Veritas (2007) Oljeindustriens Landsforening: Metode for Miljørettet Risikoanalyse (Oil industry association: methodology for environmental risk analysis) (MIRA). (Revision Apr 2007). Det Norske Veritas AS, Hovik
Det Norske Veritas (2010) Report: OLF/NOFO—summary of differences between offshore drilling regulations in Norway and U.S. Gulf of Mexico. (Revision 02, 26 Aug 2010). Det Norske Veritas AS, Hovik
Dezfuli H (2008, March 19) Achieving a holistic and risk-informed decision-making process at NASA. Tolerable risk workshop. http://www.usbr.gov/ssle/damsafety/jointventures/tolerablerisk/21Dezfuli.pdf
Dezfuli H, Youngblood R, Reinert J (2007, May 14–16) Managing risk within a decision analysis framework. In: Second IAASS conference, Chicago
Farley D (1995, January) Benefit vs. risk: how FDA approves new drugs. FDA consumer special report on new drug development in the U.S. http://www.mdadvice.com/resources/clinical_trials/fda.htm
International Organization for Standardization (2009) ISO 31000:2009: risk management—principles and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. http://www.iso.org
Kelly K (1991, June 16–21) The myth of 10–6 as a definitive acceptable risk. Presented at 84th annual meeting Air and Waste Management Association, Vancouver. http://www.heartland.org/custom/semod_policybot/pdf/17603.pdf
Kuzmack AM, McGaughy RE (1975) Quantitative risk assessment for community exposure to vinyl chloride. Office of Research and Development, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
Long MW, Narciso JE (1999, June) Probabilistic design methodology for composite aircraft structures, DOT/FAA/AT-99/2. Office of Aviation Research, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington. http://www.tc.faa.gov/its/worldpac/techrpt/ar99-2.pdf
Melchers RE (2001) On the ALARP approach to risk management. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 71(2):201–208
Merrill RA (1988) FDA’s implementation of the Delaney clause: repudiation of congressional choice or reasoned adaptation to scientific progress? Yale J Regul 5(1):1–88
Monninger J (2008, March 19) Development and use of risk information to support decision-making at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Tolerable risk workshop. http://www.usbr.gov/ssle/damsafety/jointventures/tolerablerisk/16Monninger.pdf
Morgan MG, Henrion M (1990) Uncertainty. Cambridge University Press, New York
Muller B (2008, March 18–19) Dam safety—managing risk. Tolerable risk workshop. http://www.usbr.gov/ssle/damsafety/jointventures/tolerablerisk/11Muller.pdf
Munger DF, Bowles DS, Boyer DD, Davis DW, Margo DA, Moser DA, Regan PJ, Snorteland N (2009, April 20–24) Interim tolerable risk guidelines for US Army Corps of Engineers Dams. Managing our water retention systems. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual U.S. Society on Dams conference, pp 1125–1141. http://ussdams.com/proceedings/2009Proc/1125-1142.pdf
National Research Council (1983) Risk assessment in the federal government: managing the process. National Academy Press, Washington. http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309033497
Norwegian Government (2003, June 20) Pollution control act: act of 13 Mar 1981 No. 6 concerning protection against pollution and concerning waste. Norwegian Government, information from the government and the ministries. http://www.regjeringen.no/en/doc/Laws/Acts/Pollution-Control-Act.html
Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (2009, May 15) History. http://www.npd.no/en/About-us/Organisation/History/
Norwegian Technological Standards Institution (2001, September 01) NORSOK Standard Z-103: Risk and emergency preparedness analysis, (rev. 2). Norwegian Technology Centre, Oslo. http://www.standard.no/PageFiles/955/Z-013.pdf
Nuclear Energy Institute (2007, July) Regulatory assessment performance indicator guideline, NEI 99–02 Revision 5. Nuclear Energy Institute, Washington, DC. http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/nei_9902rev5.pdf
Paté-Cornell E (2002) Risk and uncertainty analysis in government safety decisions. Risk Anal 22(3):633–646
Repcheck JR (2009, January) FAA’s implementation of the commercial space launch amendments act of 2004—The experimental permit. Office of Commercial Space Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC. http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/reports_studies/media/FAA%20Experimental%20Permit%20IAASS.pdf
Shaw SJ (1992) Use of risk assessment as an offshore design tool. J Loss Prev Process Ind 5(1):10–17
Singsaas I, Rye H, Frost TK, Mathijs GDS, Garpestad E, Skare I, Bakke K, Falcao Veiga L, Buffagini M, Follum OA, Johnsen S, Moltu UE, Reed M (2008) Development of a risk-based environmental management tool for drilling discharges: summary of a four-year project. Integr Environ Assess Manage 4(2):171–176
Society for Risk Analysis (2010, September 1) Risk analysis glossary: P–R. http://www.sra.org/resources_glossary_p-r.php
Stamatelatos M (2008, April 14–16) NASA integrated risk management process. In: TRISMAC Conference, Noordwijk, The Netherlands. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/codeq/trismac/apr08/day2/Stamatelatos_NASA_HQ.pdf
Tolerable Risk Workshop (2008) Alexandria, VA, 18–19 Mar 2008. http://www.usbr.gov/ssle/damsafety/jointventures/tolerablerisk/
Travis CC, Richter SA, Crouch EAC, Wilson R, Klema ED (1987) Cancer risk management: a review of 132 federal regulatory decisions. Environ Sci Technol 21(5):415–420
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2008, April 29) Workshop on tolerable risk evaluation: a step towards developing tolerable risk guidelines for dams and levees—summary white paper. http://www.usbr.gov/ssle/damsafety/jointventures/tolerablerisk/TRWorkshoppresentation-080429.pdf
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (2003, June 15) Guidelines for achieving public protection in dam safety decision making. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Denver. http://www.usbr.gov/ssle/damsafety/Risk/ppg2003.pdf
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (2010, November 5) Bureau of reclamation—facts and information. http://www.usbr.gov/main/about/fact.html
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1991, April 22) Memorandum: role of the baseline risk assessment in superfund remedy selection decisions, OSWER Directive 9355.0-30. http://www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/pdf/baseline.pdf
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1993, March 15) Reference dose (RfD): description and use in health risk assessments. http://www.epa.gov/iris/rfd.htm
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1997, June) Ecological risk assessment guidance for superfund: process for designing and conducting ecological risk assessments—interim final, EPA 540-R-97-006. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/ecorisk/ecorisk.htm
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1997, August 22) Memorandum: establishment of cleanup levels for CERCLA sites with radioactive contamination, OSWER Directive 9200.4-18. http://epa.gov/superfund/health/contaminants/radiation/pdfs/radguide.pdf
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000) Methodology for deriving ambient water quality criteria for the protection of human health, EPA-822-B-00-004. Office of Science and Technology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington. http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/waterquality/standards/upload/2005_05_06_criteria_humanhealth_method_complete.pdf
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2004) An examination of EPA risk assessment principles and practices, EPA-100-B-04-001. Office of the Science Advisor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/osa/pdfs/ratf-final.pdf
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2010, August 19) The history of risk at EPA. http://www.epa.gov/risk/history.htm
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2010, June 07) Asbestos Ban and phase out. http://www.epa.gov/asbestos/pubs/ban.html
U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (2000, August 30) Expected casualty calculations for commercial space launch and reentry missions, AC 431.35-1. http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/licenses_permits/media/Ac4311fn.pdf
U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (2008, May 21) System safety handbook. http://www.faa.gov/library/manuals/aviation/risk_management/ss_handbook/
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (1979, March 20) Chemical compounds in food-producing animals: criteria and procedures for evaluating assays for carcinogenic residues, Federal register 44, 17070–17114.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2000, March 3) Precaution in U.S. food safety decision making: annex II to the U.S.’ National Food Safety System Paper. http://www.foodsafety.gov/~fsg/fssyst4.html
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2005) Guidance for industry: development and use of risk minimization action plans. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United Stated Food and Drug Administration, Rockville. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM126830.pdf
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2005, September 5) Risk management plan activities in OND and ODS, MAPP 6700.1. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDER/ManualofPoliciesProcedures/ucm082058.pdf
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2009, May 11) Grade “A” pasteurized milk ordinance (2007 Revision). http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/Product-SpecificInformation/MilkSafety/NationalConferenceonInterstateMilkShipmentsNCIMSModelDocuments/PasteurizedMilkOrdinance2007/default.htm
U.S. National Aeronautical and Space Administration (1987, June) Implementation of the recommendations of the presidential commission on the space shuttle challenger accident. http://history.nasa.gov/rogersrep/v6index.htm
U.S. National Aeronautical and Space Administration (2008, December 16) Agency risk management procedural requirements. http://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/displayDir.cfm?Internal_ID=N_PR_8000_004A_andpage_name=mainandsearch_term=Risk%20Management%20Procedural%20Requirements
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1986, August 21) Safety goals for the operations of nuclear power plants, policy statement 51, Federal Register 30028
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2005, April 21) NRC news: $5,450,000 fine for Davis-Besse reactor vessel head violations. http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2005/05-070.html
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2010, October 20) History of the NRC’s risk-informed regulatory programs. http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/risk-informed/history.html
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2011, January 3) Risk-informed and performance-based plan (RPP) (2007-Present). http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/risk-informed/history/2007-present.html
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2011, January 3) Risk-informed regulation implementation plan (RIRIP) (2000–2007). http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/risk-informed/history/2000-2007.html
United Kingdom Health and Safety Executive (1992) The tolerability of risk from nuclear power stations. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London. http://www.hse.gov.uk/nuclear/tolerability.pdf
United Kingdom Health and Safety Executive (2001) Reducing risks, protecting people. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, Norwich. http://www.hse.gov.uk/risk/theory/r2p2.pdf
Vinnem JE (2007) Offshore risk assessment: principles, modelling, and applications of QRA studies, 2nd edn. Springer, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Linkov, I., Bates, M., Loney, D., Sparrevik, M., Bridges, T. (2011). Risk Management Practices. In: Linkov, I., Bridges, T. (eds) Climate. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1770-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1770-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1769-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1770-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)