Skip to main content

The Regulation of Spatial Perception

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 655 Accesses

Part of the book series: Mathematics Education Library ((MELI,volume 51))

Abstract

In thinking mathematically, how does mathematics itself become something different? And how do we ourselves change? To unsettle the ground a little for later chapters, I commence with an exploration of these issues through considering extracts from a personal reflective diary work by a former student, Krista Bradford. The diary was created as a part of a research masters’ degree programme. The enquiry attended to the cross-cultural perception of mathematical concepts during some classroom research. Formerly a primary teacher in the United Kingdom, Krista was teaching mathematics to teenagers for Voluntary Services Overseas in Uganda. The research was carried out within a practitioner enquiry frame as part of a distance education course that I had initiated within a charity-funded project. As Krista had not worked on mathematics at this level since the end of her own schooling, she experienced a steep learning curve. This curve was made steeper as she became more aware of how mathematics was constructed in Ugandan schools. Its derivation from Western curricula compounded difficulties for the students she was teaching. Krista’s raised awareness of the cultural issues also brought into question her own agency within this development context. As a white person from the west she faced the challenge of mediating the externally defined demands of the western inspired curriculum and the more immediate educational needs of her students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Radford (2003).

  2. 2.

    Žižek (2007).

  3. 3.

    Lacan (1988, p. 53).

  4. 4.

    In his later work Lacan suggests that “the displacement of the signifier determines the subjects in their acts, in their destiny, in their refusal, in their blindnesses, in their end and in their fate, their innate gifts and social acquisitions notwithstanding, without regard for character of sex, and that, willingly or not, everything that might be considered the stuff of psychology, kit and caboodle, will follow the path of the signifier” (1988, pp. 43–44).

  5. 5.

    I have written extensively about these issues of practitioner research being processed through reflective writing (Brown, 1996b; Brown & Jones, 2001: Brown & England, 2004; Brown & England, 2005; Brown, Atkinson & England, 2006; Brown, 2008d).

  6. 6.

    Luke (2003, p. 336).

  7. 7.

    Bartolini-Bussi & Boni (2003) describe the circle not as “an abstraction from the perception of round shapes” but as reconstructions, by memory of “a library of trajectories and gestures” (p. 17). (Quoted by deFreitas and Sinclair, forthcoming.)

  8. 8.

    Mathematics is initially experienced intuitively prior to its later encapsulation in symbolic form, where there is also some later evolution of the symbolic forms. For example, Spyrou, Moutsios-Rentzos and Triantafyllou (2009) discuss some experimental work with 14-year-old children where “embodied verticality” was linked through gravity with “perpendicularity”, which led “to the conquest of the “first level of objectification” (through numbers) of the Pythagorean Theorem, showing also evidence of appropriate “fore-conceptions” of the second level of objectification’ (through proof) of the theorem” (cf. Radford, 2003).

  9. 9.

    Figure 2.9 depicts a different group engaged in this activity. See also Brown (2001, pp. 119–126).

  10. 10.

    This work had been first developed elsewhere: Parker and Heywood (1998); Heywood and Parker (2010); Brown and Heywood (2010).

  11. 11.

    Aspects of this activity were inspired by the opening scene of a Hungarian film called Werckmeister harmonies, in which a bar of drunken men are encouraged to perform planetary movements. This can be viewed at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFmu7BYbthY

  12. 12.

    Barceló, Liberati, Sonego, and Visser (2009). See also Susskind (2008); Smolin (2007).

  13. 13.

    Barthes (1972); Gabriel and Žižek (2009, pp. 50–81).

  14. 14.

    Ricoeur (1984).

  15. 15.

    To be discussed in Chapter 8. See also Brown and McNamara (2011).

  16. 16.

    Elsewhere I have written about instances of depleted pedagogical technology being all that remained of past learning experiences. A student could remember the phrase Silly Old Harry Caught A Herring Trawling Off America (SOHCAHTOA) having something to do with trigonometry. Yet the student was unable to recover the associated trigonometrical relations (Brown & McNamara, 2011). I was arguing that our mathematical selves are built through caricatures of earlier experiences.

  17. 17.

    Michael Green is a string theorist now occupying the chair previously held by Newton and Hawking. Woit (2006) provides a contrary view.

  18. 18.

    Quoted in Edemariam (2009, p. 34).

  19. 19.

    Frege’s attempt to find a common ground for all mathematics by using the set theory collapsed when Russell provided his famous barber paradox, and when Gödel proved that such an attempt is impossible.

  20. 20.

    Badiou (2009a).

  21. 21.

    Wittgenstein (1983/1958); Williams (1983).

  22. 22.

    Trends in Mathematics and Science Study.

References

  • Badiou, A. (2009a). Logics of worlds. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini-Bussi, M., & Boni, M. (2003). Instruments for semiotic mediation in primary school classrooms. For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(2), 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A. (1988). Mathematical enculturation. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2001). Mathematics education and language: Interpreting hermeneutics and post-structuralism (Rev. 2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2008d). Desire and drive in researcher subjectivity: The broken mirror of Lacan. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(4), 402–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., Atkinson, D., & England, J. (2006). Regulative discourses in education: A Lacanian perspective. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., & England, J. (2004). Revisiting emancipatory teacher research: A psychoanalytic perspective. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(1), 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., & England, J. (2005). Identity, narrative and practitioner research. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 26(4), 443–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., & Jones, L. (2001). Action research and postmodernism: Congruence and critique. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., & McNamara, O. (2011). Becoming a mathematics teacher: Identity and identifications. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1989). Edmund Husserl’s origin of geometry: An introduction. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2005). Rogues: Two essays on reason. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallward, P. (2003). Badiou: A subject to truth. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1936). The origin of geometry. In J. Derrida (Ed.), Edmund Husserl’s origin of geometry: An introduction. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, M. (1962). Mathematics: A cultural approach. New York: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1988). Seminar on “The purloined letter”. In J. Muller & W. Richardson (Eds.), The purloined Poe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, R. (2003). Signal event context: Trace technologies of the habit@online. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(3), 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2003). On the epistemological limits of language. Mathematical knowledge and social practice in the Renaissance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(2), 123–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and Narrative (Vol. 1). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (2006). Memory, history and forgetting. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolin, L. (2007). The trouble with physics: The rise of string theory, the fall of a science, and what comes next. London: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, L. (2008). The black hole war: My battle with Stephen Hawking to make the world safe for quantum mechanics. London: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1983). Keywords. London: Flamingo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1983). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woit, P. (2006). Not even wrong: The failure of string theory and the search for unity in physical law. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2007). Interrogating the real. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiou, A. (2009b, March 24). Interview on BBC HARDtalk, broadcast on BBC TV News Channel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barceló, C., Liberati, S., Sonego, S., & Visser, M. (2009, October). Black stars, not holes. Scientific American.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (1994). Researching from the inside in mathematics education: Locating an I-You relationship’. In Proceedings of the eighteenth conference of the group on the psychology of mathematics education, University of Lisbon (Vol. 1, pp. 176–194). Extended version: Centre for Mathematics Education. Milton Keynes: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubring, G. (2008). Processes of algebraization in the history of mathematics: The impact of signs. In L. Radford, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (Eds.), (pp. 139–155).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, M., & Žižek, S. (2009). Mythology, madness and laughter. Subjectivity in German idealism. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (1996b). Creating data in practitioner research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(3), 261–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., & Heywood, D. (2010). Geometry, subjectivity and the seduction of language: The regulation of spatial perception. Educational Studies in Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1994). The Specters of Marx, the State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gattegno, C. (1973). The common sense of teaching mathematics. New York: Educational Solutions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gattegno, C. (1988). The science of education. Part 2B: The awareness of mathematization. New York: Educational Solutions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spyrou, P., Moutsios-Rentzos, A., & Triantafyllou, D. (2009). Teaching for the objectification of the Pythagorean Theorem. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Mathematics Education into the 21 st Century Project (pp. 530–534). Dresden: MEC21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1985). The Copernican revolution: Planetary astronomy and the development of western thought. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tony Brown .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brown, T. (2011). The Regulation of Spatial Perception. In: Mathematics Education and Subjectivity. Mathematics Education Library, vol 51. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1739-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics