Skip to main content

Continuity and Incommensurability in Ancient Greek Philosophy and Mathematics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies Series ((PSSP,volume 117))

Abstract

Aristotle, in the sixth Book of his Physics, discusses extensively the problem of continuity. Continuity is the main and essential characteristic of magnitudes. The continuum is found only in magnitudes and all magnitudes are continuous. Both philosophers and mathematicians distinguish between arithmetic and geometry in the sense that arithmetic deals with numbers and geometry with magnitudes.1 Magnitudes are continuous; numbers are discrete. In the Categories (4b20–24) Aristotle says that “of quantities some are discrete (diôrismenon), others continuous (suneches)… . Discrete are numbers and language; continuous are lines, surfaces, bodies, and also, besides these, time and place.”2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Ackrill, J. 1963. Aristotle’s Categories and De Interpretatione: Translated with Notes and Glossary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anapolitanos, D. 1985. Philosophy of Mathematics (in Greek). Athens: Nepheli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anapolitanos, D., and Á. Demis. 1996. “Incommensurability and infinity according to Proclus” (in Greek). NEUSIS, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, A. 1996. “Plato’s Philebus: The Numbering of a Unity.” In Dialogues with Plato, edited by E. Benitez. Edmonton: Academic Printing & Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benitez, E.E. 1989. Forms on Plato’s Philebus. Assen: Van Gorgum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beth, E.W. 1959. The Foundations of Mathematics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crombie, I.M. 1963. An Examination of Plato’s Doctrines. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Düring, I. 1991. Aristoteles: Darstellung und Interpretation seines Denkens (Greek transl.), Vol. A. Athens: Cultural Foundation of the Greek National Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Düring, I. 1996. Darstellung und Interpretation seines Denkens (Greek transl.), Vol. B. Athens: Cultural Foundation of the Greek National Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, D. 1987. The Mathematics of Plato’s Academy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frede, D. 1992. “Disintegration and Restoration: Pleasure and Pain in Plato’s Philebus.” In The Cambridge Companion to Plato, edited by R. Kraut. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, J. 1975. Plato: Philebus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackforth, R. 1945. Plato’s Philebus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, T. 1921. A History of Greek Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, T. 1956. Euclid: The Thirteen Books of the Elements (3 vols). New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiberg, I.L., and E.S. Stamatis, eds., 1977. Euclidis Elementa (Vol. V). Leipzig: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasmanis, V. 1990. “The Hypotheses of Mathematics in Plato’s Republic and His Contribution to the Axiomatization of Geometry.” In Greek Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, edited by P. Nicolacopoulos. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr, W.R. 1975. The Evolution of the Euclidean Elements. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr, W.R. 1982. “Infinity and Continuity: The Interaction of Mathematics and Philosophy in Antiquity.” In Infinity and Continuity in Ancient and Medieval Thought, edited by N. Kretzmann. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maziarz, E., and T. Greenwood. 1968. Greek Mathematical Philosophy. New York: Frederick Ungar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinwald, C.C. 1998. “Prometheus’s Bounds: Peras and Apeiron in Plato’s Philebus.” In Method in Ancient Philosophy, edited by J. Gentzler. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, J.M. 1979. “Forms, Nature, and the Good in the ‘Philebus’.” Phronesis 24(1):81–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, G.R., ed., trans. 1970. Proclus: A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proclus 1970. A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements. Edited and translated by G.R. Morrow. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, D. 1951. Plato’s Theory of Ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayre, K. 1983. Plato’s Late Ontology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiner, R. 1974. Knowledge and Reality in Plato’s Philebus. Assen: Van Gorgum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnige, T.G. 1968. Matter and Infinity in the Presocratic Schools and Plato. Assen: Van Gorgum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorabji, R. 1983. Time, Creation and the Continuum. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Striker, G. 1970. Peras und Apeiron. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. 1992. The Continuum and the Discrete. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vassilis Karasmanis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Karasmanis, V. (2011). Continuity and Incommensurability in Ancient Greek Philosophy and Mathematics. In: Anagnostopoulos, G. (eds) Socratic, Platonic and Aristotelian Studies: Essays in Honor of Gerasimos Santas. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 117. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1730-5_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics