Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies Series ((PSSP,volume 117))

  • 1021 Accesses

Abstract

Aristotle’s treatment of the type of desire he terms “wish” appears to be a rejection of the Socratic idea that the desire for the real good is universal, as it is the ultimate desire of virtuous and vicious alike. Indeed, in Plato’s Socratic arguments, the ultimate good and good things are the only objects of desire. At Nicomachean Ethics III.4 Aristotle considers the important question whether we desire what appears good, what is really good, or both, and concludes that an accurate account must include both objects. In denying that wish is exclusively for what is truly good, Aristotle would seem to commit himself in some way to the alternative, that wish is for what appears good. His conclusion, however, is that the object of wish is the apparent good only “to each,” while “in truth” it is the real good. I will attempt in what follows to render meaningful the contrast Aristotle takes there to be between the two views he rejects, in a way that leaves room for the third option he endorses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Broadie, S., and C.J. Rowe. 2002. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, D. 1984. Aristotle’s Philosophy of Action. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J.D.G. 1987. Aristotle. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, E.S., trans. 1960. Aristotle: Topics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. 1973. The Ethics of Aristotle. New York: Arno Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackforth, R., trans. 1971. “Plato: Philebus”. In Plato: The Collected Dialogues, edited by E. Hamilton. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamlyn, W.D., trans. 1968. Aristotle: De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, T., trans. 1979. Plato: Gorgias. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, T., trans. 1999. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joachim, H.H., trans. 1962. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jowett, B. 1968. “Aristotle: Politics”. In The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by R. McKeon. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyt, D. 1983. “Intellectualism in Aristotle.” In Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, edited by J. Anton and A. Preus. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penner, T., and C.J. Rowe. 1994. “The Desire for Good: Is the Meno Inconsistent with the Gorgias?” Phronesis XXXIX:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rackham, H., trans. 1926. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, C.D.C. 1992. Practices of Reason: Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R., trans. 1968. “Aristotle: Rhetoric”. In The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by R. McKeon. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, W.D., trans. 1984. “Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics”. In The Complete Works of Aristotle, edited by J. Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santas, G. 1979. Socrates. London: Routledge & Kegan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santas, G. 1989. “Desire and Perfection in Aristotle’s Theory of the Good.” Apeiron 22(2):75–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorey, P., trans. 1937. Plato: Republic. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tredennick, H., trans. 1962. Aristotle: Metaphysics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, M., trans. 1992. Aristotle: Eudemian Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

It is truly a pleasure to contribute to the present volume in honor of Jerry Santas, whose dedication to the study of Plato and Aristotle has shaped my deep appreciation for the insights of the ancient Greek thinkers. I am fortunate to have, in Jerry, a mentor who has so generously encouraged and challenged my thought over so many years. I wish to thank both Jerry Santas and Georgios Anagnostopoulos for helpful critical comments on the present paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariana Anagnostopoulos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anagnostopoulos, M. (2011). Aristotle on Discovering and Desiring the Real Good. In: Anagnostopoulos, G. (eds) Socratic, Platonic and Aristotelian Studies: Essays in Honor of Gerasimos Santas. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 117. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1730-5_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics