Abstract
Encouraged by Glaucon to advance his conception of the Form of the Good in one of the central scenes of the Republic, Socrates demurs: he lacks knowledge, he intimates, and contends that anything he might produce by proceeding on the basis of opinion, even true opinion, would likely prove shameful and ugly. Undeterred, Glaucon presses his request, allowing that he would be satisfied should Socrates deign to discuss goodness in the way he had already discussed justice, moderation and the other virtues. In response, Socrates declines more forcefully still: so much would satisfy him too, he says, but he fears that any effort along such lines would earn him only disgrace and render him a subject of ridicule (506b). He does not abandon all affiliated endeavors, however. After refusing Glaucon’s call for a direct investigation into the good itself, he agrees to tell Glaucon about “an offspring of the good” (ekgonos te tou agathou; 506e3), which he advances for consideration as what is “most like it” (homoiotatos ekeinô(i); 506e3–4). This is the sun.
In the realm of what is known, the Form of the Good is last and is hardly seen; but once it has been seen, it is necessary to conclude that it is in every way the cause of all that is right and fine. (Republic 517b7–c1)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Baltes, M. 1997. “Is the Good in Plato’s Republic Beyond Being?” In Studies in the Platonic Tradition, edited by M. Joyal, 2–23. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Cornford, F.M., trans. 1945. Plato: The Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ferber, R. 2005. “Ist die Idee des Guten nicht transzendent oder is sie es doch? Nochmals Platons EPEKEINA TIS OUSIAS.” In Platon über das Gute und die Gerechtigkeit, edited by D. Barbarić, 149–174. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neuman.
Fine, G. 2003. “Knowledge and Belief in Republic V–VII.” In Plato on Knowledge and Forms, edited by G. Fine. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Grube, G.M.A., trans. 1992. Plato: The Republic. Revised by C.D.C. Reeve. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Irwin, T. 1977. Plato’s Moral Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Irwin, T. 1995. Plato’s Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Joseph, H.W.B. 1948. Knowledge and the Good in Plato’s Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Keyt, D. 1969. “Plato’s Paradox that the Immutable is Unknowable.” Philosophical Quarterly 19:1–14.
Kim, J. 1974. “Non-causal Connection.” Noûs 9:41–52. Reprinted in his Supervenience and Mind, 1993, 22–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krohn, A. 1876/1976. Der plantonische Staat. Halle. Reprint: New York: Arno.
Lee, H.D.P., trans. 1974. Plato: The Republic (2nd ed.). Hammondsworth: Penguin.
Nettleship, R.L. 1901. Lectures on the Republic of Plato (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.
Prior, W.J. 1983. “The Concept of Paradeigma in Plato’s Philosophy.” Apeiron 17: 33–42.
Ross, W.D. 1953. Plato’s Theory of Ideas (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Santas, G. 1980/1999. “The Form of the Good in Plato’s Republic.” Philosophical Inquiry I: 374–403. Reprinted in Fine, G. ed., Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology, 247–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schneider, O. 1874. “Versuch einer genetischen Entwickelung des Platonischen agathon.” Dissertation, Ritter-Akademie zu Brandenburg.
Shorey, P., trans. 1937. Plato: The Republic. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Strycker, É. 1970. “L’idée du Bien dans la Republique de Platon.” L’antiquité classique 39:450–67.
Vlastos, G. 1973. “A Metaphysical Paradox.” Platonic Studies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Waterfield, R., trans. 1993. Plato: The Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shields, C. (2011). Surpassing in Dignity and Power: The Metaphysics of Goodness in Plato’s Republic . In: Anagnostopoulos, G. (eds) Socratic, Platonic and Aristotelian Studies: Essays in Honor of Gerasimos Santas. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 117. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1730-5_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1730-5_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1729-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1730-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)