Abstract
The aftereffects of the Peloponnesian War were still spawning the pains and failures of the Greek cities making even more obvious the need for political decisions to prevent another yet destructive conflict. Plato was still in his early manhood when it became clear to him that the continuation of political decadence called for careful diagnosis if it was ever to be stopped or at least subjected to reasonable controls. One of Plato’s motives for turning to philosophy as well as writing the Republic was the search for such political wisdom, so that at least the execution of philosophers would not be repeated.
By writing the Phaedo, Plato made clear what conceivably transpired in the prison on the last day of Socrates’ life. At the same time, however, he was issuing a statement on his own principles concerning the best and just type of life available to all citizens and all human beings in general. The Phaedo defined a commitment as well as a credo to the highest attainments of the reflective life. As such these principles were defended as the foundations for a life truly worth living. In this regard, by writing the Phaedo as the last will and testimony of Socrates, Plato came to declare what he could not ignore in his later compositions or repudiate and perchance compromise.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsBibliography
Adam, J. 1963. The Republic of Plato (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Allen, R., ed., trans. 1984. The Dialogues of Plato (Vol. 1). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Allen, R., ed., trans. 2006. Plato: The Republic. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Arends, J.F.M. 1997. “Could Plato Be Used as an Ally Against the Decay of Democracy?” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Greek Philosophy, edited by K.J. Boudouris, Vol. 1, 21–29.
Guthrie, W.K.C. 1962–1981. A History of Greek Philosophy (Vols. 1–6). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hamilton, R., and H. Cairns, eds. 1961. The Collected Dialogues of Plato. New York: Pantheon Books.
Jaeger, W. 1945. Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture (Vols. 1–3). New York: Oxford University Press.
Nails, D. 2002. The People of Plato. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.
Nettleship, R.L. 1898/1963. Lectures on the Republic of Plato. London: Macmillan.
Santas, G. 1979. Socrates: Philosophy in Plato’s Early Dialogues. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Santas, G. 1980. “Plato on Love, Beauty and the Good.” In The Greeks and the Good Life, edited by D.J. Depew, 33–68. Fullerton: Publication of California State University, Fullerton.
Santas, G. 1988. Plato and Freud: Two Theories of Love. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Anton, J.P. (2011). The Republic as Philosophical Drama. In: Anagnostopoulos, G. (eds) Socratic, Platonic and Aristotelian Studies: Essays in Honor of Gerasimos Santas. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 117. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1730-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1730-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1729-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1730-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)