Abstract
Martin Heidegger criticizes the representational view of language and truth from the perspective of phenomenological ontology. Primarily he criticizes the presupposition that the content of an idea is an object it stands for and that judging is related to having a representation of an object in our minds, in our consciousness. Heidegger’s critique of the representational theory of truth and language goes hand in hand with his critique of modernity. He thinks that in the West, thought about thinking resulted in a discipline of logic gathering special knowledge concerning a special kind of thinking, which is called logistics. Logistics is considered to be the only possible form of strict philosophy because it is integrated with the technological universe, which exercises power over other disciplines in our era. As a result of this, thinking is transformed into one-track thinking generating an absolute univocity. In this paper, I concentrate on Heidegger’s critique of the representational view of language and truth by correlating it with that of Wittgenstein, and by focusing on what sense Heidegger’s critique of the representational theory of truth is related to his critique of modernity. The first part of the article discusses the critique of the representational theory of truth, the second part of the article presents Heidegger’s alternative and the third part deals with his critique of modernity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dreyfus, Hubert. 1991. Being-in-the-world: A commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dreyfus, Hubert. 2007. Heidegger Podcast. Webcast.berkeley Course Philosophy 185 http://www.learnoutloud.com/Catalog/Philosophy/Modern-Philosophy/Heidegger-Podcast/24272#3
Gelven, Michael. 1989. A commentary on Heidegger’s being and time. De Kalb: Northern Illinois Press.
Heidegger, Martin. 1962 (2007). Being and time (trans: Macquarrie, John, and Edward Robinson). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Heidegger, Martin. 1968. What is called thinking? (trans: Gray, J.G.). New York: Harper and Row.
Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The question concerning technology and other essays (trans: Lovitt, William). New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Heidegger, Martin. 1998 (2006). On the essence of truth. In Pathmarks, ed. William McNeill, 136–154. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heidegger, Martin. 2002. The essence of truth (trans: Sadler, Ted). New York: Continuum
Searle, John. 1979 (1999). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1967. In Philosophical investigations, eds. G.E.M. Anscombe and R. Rhees (trans: Anscombe, G.E.M.), 2nd edn., §§§ 23-25-27. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1969. In On certainty, eds. G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. von Wright (trans: Paul, D. and G.E.M. Anscombe), §§§ 349-350-352. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Turanli, A. (2011). Perspicuous Representation: A Wittgensteinian Interpretation of Martin Heidegger’s View of Truth. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) Phenomenology/Ontopoiesis Retrieving Geo-cosmic Horizons of Antiquity. Analecta Husserliana, vol 110. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1691-9_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1691-9_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1690-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1691-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)