Abstract
Interactive resource planning is an increasingly important aspect of emission trading markets. The conferences of Rio de Janeiro, 1992, and Kyoto, 1997, originally focusing on environmental protection at both macro- and micro-economic levels, called for new economic instruments of this kind. An important economic tool in this area is Joint Implementation (JI), defined in Article 6 of the Kyoto Protocol. Sustainable development can be guaranteed only if JI is embedded in optimal energy management. In this contribution we describe and evaluate one international procedure within uncertain markets which helps to establish optimal energy management and interactive resource planning processes within uncertain emission trading markets.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Branzei R, Dimitrov D, Tijs S (2005) Models in cooperative game theory, crisp, fuzzy, and multi-choice games. Springer, Berlin
Coase RH (1988) The firm, the market, and the law. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 1–31
Cowan R, David PA et al (2000) The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Ind Corp Change 9(2):211–253
Ermolieva T, Ermoliev Y, Fischer G, Jonas M, Makowski M, Wagner F (2010) Carbon emission trading and carbon taxes under uncertainties. Clim Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9910-x
Grabner C, Hahn H, Leopold-Wildburger U, Pickl S (2009) Analyzing the sustainability of harvesting behaviour and the relationship to personality traits in a simulated Lotka–Volterra biotope. Eur J Oper Res 193(3):761–767
Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Krabs W, Pickl S (2003) Controllability of a time-discrete dynamical system with the aid of the solution of an approximation problem. Control Cybernetics 32(4):57–74
Kropat E, Weber G-W, Akteke-Öztürk B (2008) Eco-finance networks under uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the international conference on engineering optimization, EngOpt 2008, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (ISBN 978857650156, CD)
Langlois RN (1984) Internal organisation in a dynamic context: some theoretical considerations. In: Jussawalla M, Ebenfield H (eds) Communication and information economics: new perspectives. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 23–49
MacNeil IR (1978) Contracts: adjustment of long-term economic relations under classical, neoclassical, and relational contract law. Northwest Univ Law Rev 72(6):854–905
Nahorski Z, Horabik J (2010) Compliance and emission trading rules for asymmetric emission uncertainty estimates. Clim Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9916-4
Nightingale P (2003) If Nelson and Winter are only half right about tacit knowledge, which half? A searlean critique of ‘codification’. Ind Corp Change 12(2):149–183
Pickl S (1999) Der τ-value als Kontrollparameter. Modellierung und analyse eines joint-implementation programmes mithilfe der kooperativen dynamischen Spieltheorie und der diskreten Optimierung. Shaker, Aachen (in German)
Pickl S (2002) An iterative solution to the nonlinear time-discrete TEM model—the occurrence of chaos and a control theoretic algorithmic approach. AIP Conf Proc 627(1):196–205
Shvidenko A, Schepaschenko D, McCallum I, Nilsson S (2010) Can the uncertainty of full carbon accounting of forest ecosystems be made acceptable to policymakers? Clim Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9918-2
Weber G-W, Alparslan-Gök SZ, Söyler B (2009a) A new mathematical approach in environmental and life sciences: gene-environment networks and their dynamics. Environ Model Assess 14(2):267–288. doi:10.1007/s10666-007-9137-z
Weber G-W, Kropat E, Akteke-Öztürk B, Görgülü Z-K (2009b) A survey on OR and mathematical methods applied on gene-environment networks. Cent Eur J Oper Res 17(3):315–341. doi:10.1007/s10100-009-0092-4 (special issue on “innovative approaches for decision analysis in energy, health, and life sciences”)
Winiwarter W, Muik B (2010) Statistical dependence in input data of national greenhouse gas inventories: effects on the overall inventory uncertainty. Clim Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9921-7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pickl, S., Kropat, E., Hahn, H. (2010). The impact of uncertain emission trading markets on interactive resource planning processes and international emission trading experiments. In: Jonas, M., Nahorski, Z., Nilsson, S., Whiter, T. (eds) Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1670-4_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1670-4_19
Received:
Accepted:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1669-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1670-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)