Skip to main content

The Three Notions of Liberty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Essays on the Doctrinal Study of Law

Part of the book series: Law and Philosophy Library ((LAPS,volume 96))

  • 1376 Accesses

Abstract

For the purposes of this contribution, Philip Pettit has made an important distinction between singular and plural notions of liberty or freedom. He writes:

We concern ourselves in the singular mode with how far someone is free to do or not to do certain things, or with how far someone is a free person or not a free person. But, equally, we concerns ourselves with the plural question as to how far the person enjoys the liberties that we take to be important or basic (Pettit 2008, 201).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Berlin, I. (2002), Liberty (Revised and expanded edition of Four Essays on Liberty), in: Berlin, Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. (2008), The Basic Liberties, in: The Legacy of H. L. A. Hart: Legal, Political and Moral Philosophy, edited by Matthew Kramer et al., 201 ff. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (1984), The Idea of Negative Liberty. Philosophical and Historical Perspectives, in: Philosophy in History, edited by R. Rorty, J. B. Schneewind, and Q. Skinner, 193 ff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1976), Knowing & Acting. An Invitation to Philosophy. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Wright, G. (1971), Explanation and Understanding. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, I. (2007), Positive and Negative Liberty, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 1 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garzón Valdés, E. (2006a), Cuál es la relevancia moral del concepto de dignididad humana? in: Tolerancia, dignididad y democracia, 231 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. (2009), Law and Liberty, in: Law and Republicanism, edited by Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí, 39 ff. Oxford Scholarship Online Monographs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aulis Aarnio .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aarnio, A. (2011). The Three Notions of Liberty. In: Essays on the Doctrinal Study of Law. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 96. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1655-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics