Abstract
Friedrich Scheiermacher (1768–1834), one of the influential figures of the German Romanticism, paid particular consideration to the problem that emerges when attempts are made to endow a given text with an understandable content. Schleiermacher saw this problem as follows: Every act that leads one to the correct understanding of a text is (and must be) ultimately based on a dialogue between the author and the interpreter – that is, on some sort of an imagined conversation. Every author addresses his text to some interpreter. When this basic pattern is inverted and the matter is looked at from the interpreter’s viewpoint, the task then is to reply to the author’s oral or written expression in the context in which it was originally presented. In this way it becomes possible to have an authentic interpretation, an understanding of the text that is based on a dialogue between I (Ich) and you (Du).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Aarnio, A. (1987), The Rational as Reasonable. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Alexy, R. (2004a), Menschenrecht ohne Metaphysik, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 52, 15 ff.
Burke, K. (1945), A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Gizbert-Studnicki, T. (1988), Das hermeneutische Bewusstsein der Juristen, Rechtstheorie 1, 151 ff.
Perelman, C. (1968), Rhetoric and Philosophy, Philosophy and Rhetoric I, 15 ff.
Ray, J. (1978), Perelman’s Universal Audience, The Quaterly Journal of Speech 4 (64), 361 ff.
Toulmin, S. (1968), The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, S. (1976), Knowing & Acting. An Invitation to Philosophy. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Villa, V. (1984), Legal Science and Hermeneutic Point of View, in: Theory of Legal Sciences, edited by A. Peczenik, 509 ff. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Weinberger, O. (1973), Topik und Plausibilitätsargumentation, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 1, 17 ff.
Aarnio, A. (1983b), Eternal and Changing Law, in: Philosophical Perspectives in Jurisprudence, Acta Philosophica Fennica, 94 ff.
Aarnio, A. (1997), Reason and Authority. A Treatise on the Dynamic Paradigm of Legal Dogmatics. Aldershot. Ashgate.
Garzón Valdés, E. (2006a), Cuál es la relevancia moral del concepto de dignididad humana? in: Tolerancia, dignididad y democracia, 231 ff.
Hoerster, N. (1983), Moralbegründung Ohne Metaphysik, in: Erkenntnis 19, 1 ff.
Von Wright, G. (1971), Explanation and Understanding. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
Burke, K. (1969), A Rhetoric of Motives (1st edition 1950). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aarnio, A. (2011). Outlines of the New Rhetoric. In: Essays on the Doctrinal Study of Law. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 96. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1655-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1655-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1654-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1655-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)