Abstract
Land tenure security is often considered a requirement for forest carbon (C) finance investments, as a way to ensure that C emission reductions can be legally delivered to buyers and to promote permanence of emission reductions from forest activities. Areas under unsecure land tenure are regarded as less attractive for C finance investments. Nevertheless, there is limited research on how C finance may conversely affect land tenure. This paper aims to contribute to this debate by exploring how land tenure security of local landholders and communities in reforestation areas may be affected through forest C projects. By clarifying C ownership, a C transaction creates a new stick to the bundle of rights associated with land (emission reductions from sequestered C), which normally is created with clear tenure. This can in turn directly affect the overall land tenure for those landholders involved in the transaction. Carbon ownership clarification can be achieved through institutional arrangements, such as community-level benefit-sharing agreements or legal private contracts. Adequate design and implementation of C finance transactions can also influence land tenure security, mainly by supporting the organizations of local landholders around rural institutions and encouraging the involvement of national land agencies in the implementation of the project. These institutional arrangements prompted by C transactions can result in overall increased land tenure security for landholders and communities in the reforestation project area, as evidenced by two case studies from agroforestry projects in Niger and Kenya.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Landholder here is broadly understood as the individual or community participating in a C finance transaction regardless of the ownership of the land. Landholders encompass fully titled private landowners, titled community lands, untitled private and community landowners, governments, etc.
- 2.
Kamweti and Acworth (2006).
- 3.
Kenya National Land Policy – Ministry of Lands, National Land Policy Secretariat, May 2007; Kenya Forest Act – Ministry of Lands, National Land Policy Secretariat, 2005.
References
Barnes G, Quail S (2009) Property rights to carbon in the context of climate change. School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida. Available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTIE/Resources/Barnes.doc. Accessed 8 Nov 2010
Bruce JW (1986) Land tenure issues in project design and strategies for agricultural development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 190 p
Bruce JW, Migot-Adholla SE (eds.) (1994) Searching for land tenure security in Africa. The World Bank, Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, 282 p
Cotula L, Mayers J (2009) Tenure in REDD – start-point or afterthought? Natural resource issues. No. 15. International Institute for Environment and Development. London. 56 p. Available at http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/for/wscb-fbdcc…/wscb-fbdcc-01-oth-07-en.pdf. Accessed Dec 2010
Desanker PV (2005) The Kyoto Protocol and the CDM in Africa: a good idea but…. Unasylva 222(56):24–26
Eliasch J (2008) Climate change: financing global forests: the Eliasch review. Office of Climate Change, UK, 273 p
FAO (2002) Law and sustainable development since Rio: legal trends in agriculture and natural resources management. FAO legislative study no. 73. FAO Legal Office, Rome. For more information: http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/Y3872E/y3872e00.htm#Contents. Accessed 12 Nov 2010
Kamweti D, Acworth J (2006) Green Belt Movement BioCarbon Project, Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Study. Prepared by KAMFOR Ltd. for the BioCarbon Fund
Kunhamu TK, Kumar BM, Samuel S (2011) Does tree management affect biomass and soil carbon stocks of Acacia mangium Willd. Stands in Kerala, India ? In: Kumar BM, Nair PKR (eds.) Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems: opportunities and challenges. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 217–228
Luttrell C, Schreckenberg K, Peskett L (2007) The implications of carbon financing for pro-poor community forestry. Forest policy and environment programme, Overseas Development Institute, Forestry Briefing, London, 145 p
Migot-Adholla S, Hazell PB, Blarel B, Place F (1991) Indigenous land rights systems in Sub-Saharan Africa: a constraint on productivity? World Bank Econ Rev 5:155–175
Omura M (2008) Property rights and natural resource management incentives: do transferability and formality matter? Am J Agric Econ 90(4):1143–1155
Perez C, Roncoli C, Neely C, Steiner JL (2007) Can carbon sequestration markets benefit low-income producers in semi-arid Africa? Potentials and challenges. Agric Syst 94(1):2–12
Pirard R (2008) The fight against deforestation (REDD): economic implications of market-based funding, vol 20, Idées Pour le Debat. Institut du Développement Durable et des Relations Internationales, Paris
Quan J, Dyer N (2008) Climate change and land tenure: the implications of climate change for land tenure and land policy. FAO, Land tenure working paper 2. IIED/University of Greenwich/FAO. 2008. Available at ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/aj332e/aj332e00.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2010
Roncoli C, Jost C, Perez C, Moore K, Ballo A, Cissé S, Ouattara K (2007) Carbon sequestration from common property resources: lessons from community-based sustainable pasture management in north-central Mali. Agric Syst 94:97–109
Samek JH, Skole DL, Klinhom U, Butthep C, Navanugraha C, Uttaruk P, Laosuwan T (2011) Inpang carbon bank in northeast Thailand: a community effort in carbon trading from agroforestry projects. In: Kumar BM, Nair PKR (eds.) Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems: opportunities and challenges. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 263–280
Saunders L, Hanbury-Tenison R, Swingland IR (2002) Social capital from carbon property: creating equity for indigenous people. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A 360:1763–1775
Streck C (2009) Rights and REDD+: legal and regulatory considerations. In: Angelsen A, Brockhaus M, Kanninen M, Sills E, Sunderlin WD, Wertz-Kanounnikoff S (eds.) Realising REDD+: national strategy and policy options. CIFOR, Bogor, pp 151–162
Unruh JD (2008) Carbon sequestration in Africa: the land tenure problem. Glob Environ Change 18(4):700–707
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Aquino, A.R., Aasrud, A., Guimarães, L. (2011). Can Forest Carbon Finance Influence Land Tenure Security in Project Areas? Preliminary Lessons from Projects in Niger and Kenya. In: Kumar, B., Nair, P. (eds) Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems. Advances in Agroforestry, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1630-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1630-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1629-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1630-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)