Abstract
What can contemporary virtue ethics say about the problem of abortion? In what follows I attempt to answer that question by considering both what has been said and what we may further argue from a virtue-focused perspective. We begin by comparing virtue ethics to the two other dominant approaches in normative ethics. I then consider what some important virtue ethicists have said about abortion in particular, especially Rosalind Hursthouse. After recognizing the many contributions her analysis offers, I also note some of the deficiencies in her approach, particularly in her attempt to bracket the problems of fetal status and women’s rights. Finally, in light of these criticisms I attempt to extend a virtue ethics analysis to embrace a more robust recognition of the humanity of the fetus and the attendant demand of a near absolute prohibition on abortion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anscombe, G.E.M. 1958. Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy 33(124): 1–19.
Aristotle. 1932. Politics (trans: Rackam, H.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Aristotle. 1999. Nicomachean ethics (trans: Irwin, T.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
Coope, Christopher Miles. 2006. Modern virtue ethics. In Values and virtues: Aristotelianism in contemporary ethics, ed. Timothy Chappell, 20–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crisp, Roger, and Slote, Michael. 1997. Virtue ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Foot, Philippa. 1978. Virtues and vices. Oxford: Blackwell.
Foot, Philippa. 2001. Natural goodness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hacker-Wright, John. 2007. Moral status in virtue ethics. Philosophy 82: 449–473.
Hursthouse, Rosalind. 1987. Beginning lives. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hursthouse, Rosalind. 1991. Virtue theory and abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs 20(3): 223–246.
Hursthouse, Rosalind. 1999. On virtue ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kass, Leon. 1993. Is there a right to die? The Hastings Center Report 23(1): 34–43.
Kornegay, R. Jo. 2011. Hursthouse’s virtue ethics and abortion: Abortion ethics without metaphysics? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14(1): 51–71.
Oderberg, David. 2000a. Applied ethics: A non-consequentialist approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
Oderberg, David. 2000b. Moral theory: A non-consequentialist approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
Railton, Peter. 1984. Alienation, consequentialism, and the demands of morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 13(2): 134–171.
Richter, Duncan. 1998. Is abortion vicious. The Journal of Value Inquiry 32: 318–392.
Singer, Peter. 1999. Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slote, Michael. 2001. Morals from motives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smart, J.J.C., and Bernard Williams. 1973. Utilitarianism for and against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1971. A defense of abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1(1): 47–66.
Warren, Mary Ann. 1973. On the moral and legal status of abortion. The Monist 57(1): 43–61.
Warren, Mary Ann. 1991. Postscript on infanticide. In Biomedical ethics, eds. Thomas A. Mappes and Jane S. Zembaty, 3rd ed., 442–444. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lu, M. (2011). Abortion and Virtue Ethics. In: Napier, S. (eds) Persons, Moral Worth, and Embryos. Philosophy and Medicine(), vol 111. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1602-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1602-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1601-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1602-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)