Advertisement

Creating Action Space: Small-Scale Fisheries Policy Reform in South Africa

  • Moenieba IsaacsEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The main argument of this chapter centers on whether formalizing governance processes and drafting a small-scale fisheries policy will decrease vulnerability and improve the livelihoods of small-scale fishers. Findings suggest that with no one organization representing fishers in the communities of Struisbaai and Arniston along the southern coast of South Africa, the space is wide open for the elite (rights holders) to capture the benefits. The inability to access rights through formal channels has forced a situation where many fishers resort to poaching, even within the marine protected areas (MPAs). The analytical framework draws on concepts related to the institutional dimensions of fisheries governance; the formal and informal action space for developing a new small-scale fisheries policy for South Africa; and the vulnerability of fishers with weak agency. Data were collected mainly through qualitative methods from key informants, focus group interviews, household interviews, and participatory observations at the local community level.

Keywords

Action Space Marine Protected Area Governance Process Artisanal Fisher African National Congress 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Tracey-Lee Dennis, Stuart du Plessis, and John Granfield who assisted me in the field. Thanks also to the Norwegian Research Council for providing the funding for the PovFish project. In addition, the comments of Ratana Chuenpagdee and Svein Jentoft to my chapter were invaluable, and also the editing of this chapter by Maria-Victoria Gunnarsdottir.

References

  1. Agrawal A (2001) Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Dev 29:1649–1672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal A (2002) Common resources and institutional sustainability. In: Ostrom E, Dietz T, Dolšak N, Stern PC, Stonich S, Weber EU (eds) The drama of the commons. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrawal A, Gibson CC (1999) Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Dev 27(4):629–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Almudi T, Kalikoski DC (2010) Traditional fisherfolk and no-take protected areas: the Peixe Lagoon National Park dilemma. Ocean Coast Manage 53:225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barberton C, Kotze H (1998) Creating action space: the challenge of poverty and democracy in South Africa. Idasa, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  6. Berkes F (1999) Sacred ecology: traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia/LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Cape Agulhas Municipality’s Draft Integrated Development Report (2009/2010)Google Scholar
  8. Dennis TL (2009) Perceptions of history and policy in the Cape Agulhas area: could history influence policy on small-scale fishing? Unpublished mini-thesis submitted to Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS), University of Western CapeGoogle Scholar
  9. Gelcich S, Godoy N, Castilla JC (2009) Artisanal fishers’ perceptions regarding coastal co-management policies and their potential to scale-up marine biodiversity conservation. Ocean Coast Manage 52:424–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gustavson K, Koeker Z, Walmsley J, Juma S (2009) A process framework for coastal zone management in Tanzania. Ocean Coast Manage 52:78–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hogan JD, Marandola E (2005) Towards an interdisciplinary conceptualisation of vulnerability. Popul Space Place 11:455–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Isaacs M (2003) Understanding the social processes and politics of implementing a new fisheries policy, the Marine Living Resources Act 18 of 1998, in South Africa. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Western CapeGoogle Scholar
  13. Isaacs M (2006) Small-scale fisheries reform: expectations, hopes and dreams of ‘a better life for all’. Mar Policy 30:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Isaacs M, Hara M (2007) Transformation in the South African fishing industry and its ability to redistribute fishing rights. American fisheries society symposium, 49, 2007Google Scholar
  15. Isaacs M, Hara M, Raakjær J (2007) Has reforming South African fisheries contributed to wealth redistribution and poverty alleviation? Ocean Coast Manage 50:301–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jentoft S (2006) Limits of governability: institutional implications for fisheries and coastal governance. Mar Policy 31:360–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leach M, Mearns R, Scoones I (1999) Environmental entitlements: dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management. World Dev 27:225–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Paavola J (2006) Institutions and environmental governance: a reconceptualization. Ecol Econ 63:93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sarkar S (1998) Restoring wilderness or reclaiming forests. Terra Nova Nat Cult 3(3):35–52Google Scholar
  21. Scott JC (1985) Weapons of the weak. Everyday forms of peasant resistance. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  22. Scott JC (1990) Domination and the arts of resistance: hidden transcripts. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  23. Sunde J, Isaacs M (2008) Marine conservation and coastal communities: who carries the costs? A study of marine protected areas and their impact on traditional small-scale fishing communities in South Africa. SAMUDRA Monograph. International Collective in Support of Fishworkers. www.icsf.net
  24. Tobey T, Torell E (2006) Coastal poverty and MPA management in mainland Tanzania and Zanzibar. Ocean Coast Manage 49:834–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Webster N, Engberg-Pedersen L (2002) In the name of the poor: contesting political space for poverty reduction. Zed Books Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Wilson DC (2003) Conflict and scale: a defense of community approaches in fisheries management. In: Wilson DG, Raakjaer Nielsen J, Degnbol P (eds) The fisheries co-management experience: accomplishments, challenges and prospects. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 193–211Google Scholar
  27. Wilson DG, Raakjaer Nielsen J, Degnbol P (eds) (2003) The fisheries co-management experience: accomplishments, challenges and prospects. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 193–211Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for PovertyLand and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS), University of the Western CapeBellvilleSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations