Advertisement

Through Boom and Bust: Coping with Poverty in Sea Snail Fisheries on the Turkish Black Sea Coast

  • Ståle KnudsenEmail author
  • Hakan Koçak
Chapter

Abstract

Small-scale fisheries for the introduced sea snail (Rapana venosa) have seen booms followed by irreversible bust. This chapter focuses on the role of this fishery relative to poverty dynamics on the Turkish Black Sea coast, and explores how fishers cope with boom and bust, respectively. We consider poverty as a multi-faceted issue and analyze in some detail fishers’ income, social security, health, education, housing, as well as people’s own, culturally-informed perception of what constitutes poverty. Yet, our analysis aims beyond a descriptive account of poverty among fishers, and queries the epistemological status of the vicious circle model. Thus, we discuss how sea snail fishing has also constituted a way out of poverty; that it is uncertain whether overfishing can be blamed for the bust; that contextual factors, such as state welfare and agricultural policies, international organizations, and world economic dynamics, can have significant impact on poverty and wealth among the coastal population of the Black Sea coast of Turkey. The boom years of the sea snail fisheries clearly created a frontier situation inhibiting prospects of co-management between the state and communities of fishers. The observed lack of collective action among fishers and their concomitant incapacity to participate can be considered a dimension of poverty. Therefore, fishery development should not only go hand in hand with fishery management, but also with social policies aimed at reducing poverty and inequality.

Keywords

Collective Action Vicious Circle Social Assistance Small Boat Green Card 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

In addition to funding from the PovFish project, the research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme [FP7/2007–2013]: Knowledge-based Sustainable Management for Europe’s Seas (EC FP7 – grant 226675). The KnowSeas project is affiliated with LOICZ and LWEC. The authors want to thank research assistants Özlem Yeniay and Kayhan Ural for their very competent participation during fieldwork and data assessment. We are deeply indebted to all the informants who willingly shared time and information with us. This work would not have been possible without fishers, fisher wives, scientists, managers, factory owners, and others being so forthcoming. Thanks to them all!

References

  1. Acheson JM (1981) Anthropology of fishing. Annu Rev Anthropol 10:275–316Google Scholar
  2. Akder H (2000) Türkiye’de Bölgesel Eşitsizlikler ve Kırsal Yoksulluk. In: Akder H, Güvenç M (eds.) Yoksulluk. TESEV Yayını, İstanbul, pp 15–36Google Scholar
  3. Alkan I, Kiliç O (2007) Samsun İli Terme İlçesinin ova ve yüksek kesimindeki fındık işletmecilerin karşılaştırmalı ekonomik analizi. J Fac Agric, Ondokuz Mayis Universitesi 22(2):171–178Google Scholar
  4. Allison EH, Ellis F (2001) The livelihoods approach and management of small-scale fisheries. Mar Policy 25(5):377–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baum HS (2001) Citizen participation. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes PB (eds.) International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Oxford, Pergamon, pp 1840–1846Google Scholar
  6. Béné C (2003) When fishery rhymes with poverty: a first step beyond the old paradigm on poverty in small-scale fisheries. World Dev 31(6):949–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brox O (1990) Common property theory: epistemological status and analytical utility. Hum Organ 49(3):227–235Google Scholar
  8. Buğra A (2008) Kapitalizm Yoksulluk ve Türkiye’de Sosyal Politika. İletişim Yayınları, İstanbulGoogle Scholar
  9. Buğra A, Keyder Ç (2005) Poverty and social policy in contemporary Turkey. Unpublished manuscript, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  10. Çakmak EH, Eruygur HO (2008) Food, rural, agricultural, and fisheries policies in Turkey. Options méditerranéenns, Séries B 61:165–206Google Scholar
  11. Erdoğan N (ed.) (2007) Yoksulluk Halleri. İletişim Yayınları, İstanbulGoogle Scholar
  12. Eruygur HO (2006) Impacts of policy changes on Turkish agriculture: an optimization model with maximum entropy. Unpublished Doctor of Philosophy, The Middle East Technical University, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  13. GoS (2009) Nüfus Durumu. Samsun: Governorship of Samsun homepagesGoogle Scholar
  14. Gülçubuk B, Aluftekin N (2006) Impact of international agricultural policies on rural poverty in Turkey. Int Bus Econ Res J 5(1):9–18Google Scholar
  15. Işık O, Pınarcıoğlu MM (2001) Nöbetleşe Yoksulluk. İletişim Yayınları, İstanbulGoogle Scholar
  16. Knudsen S (1997) A comparative study of fishing communities and public awareness in Turkey and Ukraine. Black Sea Environmental Programme, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  17. Knudsen S (1998) What role for the Turkish fishery co-operatives? Organisational preconditions for a new management regime in the Black Sea. In: Paper presented at the FISHECO’98: The Proceedings of the first international symposium on fisheries and ecology, TrabzonGoogle Scholar
  18. Knudsen S (2006) Between life giver and leisure: identity negotiation through seafood in Turkey. Int J Middle East Studies 38(3):395–415Google Scholar
  19. Knudsen S (2009) Fishers and scientists in modern Turkey. The management of resources, knowledge and identity on the Eastern Black Sea Coast. Berghahn Books, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Knudsen S, Zengin M (2006) Case study 2: Trawl and sea snail fisheries in Samsun, Black Sea coast of Turkey. Deliverable 5.2Google Scholar
  21. Knudsen S, Zengin M, Koçak MH (2010) Identifying drivers for fishing pressure. A multidisciplinary study of trawl and sea snail fisheries in Samsun, Black Sea coast of Turkey. Ocean Coast Manage 53(5–6):252–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kopytoff I (1987) The African frontier. The reproduction of traditional African societies. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  23. Köse AH, Bahçe S (2009) Yoksulluk’ Yazınının Yoksulluğu: Toplumsal Sınıflarla Düşünmek. Praksis 19(1):385–419Google Scholar
  24. Mangahas MF (2000) Managing luck and negotiating change-ethnographies of fishing and sharing in the Philippines. University of Cambridge, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. McGoodwin JR (1990) Crisis in the World’s fisheries. People, Problems, and Policies. Stanford: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
  26. MEF (2008). Ordu-Trabzon-Rize-Giresun-Gümüşhane-Artvin Planlama Bölgesi 1/100.000 Ölçekli Çevre Düzeni Planı Araştırma Raporu. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Republic of Turkey, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  27. MHT (2009) Yeşil kart kayıtlarının ilçelere göre dağılımı (İptal edilen yeşil kartlılar dahil değildir). The Ministry of Health of Turkey, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  28. Oktik N (ed.) (2008) Türkiye’de Yoksulluk Çalışmalar. Yakın Kitabevi Yayınları, İzmirGoogle Scholar
  29. Özbudun S, Başokçu EK (2004) Bizim Köyde Yoksulluk Yok Ki!’ ya da Yoksunluktan Yoksulluğa Türkiye Kırsalı Üzerine Notlar. Toplum ve Hekim 19(1):39–47Google Scholar
  30. Pauly D (1994) From growth to Malthusian overfishing: stages of fisheries resources misuse. Tradit Mar Resour Manage Knowledge Info Bull 3:7–14Google Scholar
  31. SABEK (2005) Samsun İl gelişim stratejisi. Mevcut durum ve analizi raporu. Samsun Bölgesel Ekonomik Kalkınma, SamsunGoogle Scholar
  32. SAG (2005) Trabzon yatırım ortamı ve yapabilecek yatırımlar araştırması. Sanayi Araştırma ve Geliştirme Genel Müdürlüğü, Republic of Turkey Ministry of Industry and Trade, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  33. Sahlins M (1972) Stone age economics. Tavistock Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Sen A (1983) Development: which way now? Econ J 93(372):745–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sen A (1999) Development as freedom. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Şenses F (2001) Küreselleşmenin Öteki Yüzü Yoksulluk. İletişim Yayınları, İstanbulGoogle Scholar
  37. SPO (2004a) İlçelerin sosyo-ekonomik gelişimlik sıralaması araştırması. Turkish Republic State Planning Organization, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  38. SPO (2004b) Yeşilırmak havza gelişim projesi (Amasya, Çorum, Samsun, Tokat) Mevcut durum ve analizi. Turkish Republic State Planning Organization, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  39. Termehaber(2010) Termenin Nüfus ve Sosyal Yapısı, 2010, from http://www.termehaber.com/haber-358-Termenin-Nüfus-ve-Sosyal-Yapısı.html
  40. Tsing AL (2005) Friction. An ethnography of global connection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  41. TURKSTAT (2004) Turkey’s statistical yearbook 2004. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  42. TURKSTAT (2009) Results of 2008 poverty study. Turkish Statistical Institute, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  43. TURKSTAT (2010) Adrese dayalı nüfus kayıt sistemi nüfus sayım sonuçları, 2009. TURKSTAT Haber Bülteni, 2010(15)Google Scholar
  44. UNDP (2009) Human development report 2009, Turkey. The human development index – going beyond income, United Nations Development ProgrammeGoogle Scholar
  45. World Bank (2003) Turkey. Poverty and coping after crises (No. 24185-TR): World Bank, Human Development Unit, Europe and Central Asia Region, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  46. Yoltar Ç (2009) When the poor need health care: ethnography of state and citizenship in Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies 45(5):767–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social AnthropologyUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
  2. 2.Department of Labor Economics and Industrial RelationsKocaeli UniversityKocaeliTurkey

Personalised recommendations