Abstract
This chapter provides the necessary grounding in political ideology and its influence on the ways people perceive and act in the social world. Every political ideology has three aspects: a critique of society, a vision of the best society, and agency to get closer to attaining that vision. This chapter makes a case for the relevance of three political ideologies that arose out of modernity, namely, liberalism, conservatism, and socialism. It explains the evolution of all three ideologies, in particular the ways in which the critical left has reformed the economic theories of socialism into social democracy, an ideology that shares the same social values as liberalism in terms of minority rights and anti-capital punishment. Social democratic governments accept capitalism, but support legislation to help economically oppressed groups. This chapter deconstructs ubiquitous use of political terms such as right wing and left wing by replacing them with a more sophisticated taxonomy that includes specific ideological positions on both economic and social issues. For example, this economic/social distinction explains why some Americans call the Democratic Party left wing, while others consider it to be as supportive of the corporate agenda as the Republican Party. Both views are correct: on social issues, the Democrats are mostly progressive or left wing, while on economic issues they are clearly beholden to the right wing agenda of the major corporations. The chapter includes questions that will help the reader develop a deep understanding of these ideologies and their positions on important social, economic, and political issues in the United States and Canada.
[A] ruling ideology does not so much combat alternative ideas as thrust them beyond the very bounds of the unthinkable. Ideologies exist because there are things which must at all costs not be thought, let alone spoken. How we could ever know that there were such thoughts is then an obvious logical difficulty. Perhaps we can just feel that there is something we ought to be thinking, but we have no idea what it is. (Eageton, 1991, p. 58)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aronowitz, S. (1988). Science as power: Discourse and ideology in modern society. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bartolome, L. I. (Ed.). (2008). Ideologies in education: Unmasking the trap of teacher neutrality. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Chomsky, N. (1999). Profit over people: Neoliberalism and global order. New York: Seven Stories Press.
Eageton, T. (1991) Ideology: An introduction. London: Verso.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. London: Harvester Press.
Fraser, N. (1997). Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the “postsocialist” condition. New York: Routledge.
Giddens, A. (1994). Beyond left and right: The future of radical politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Giroux, H. A. (1981). Ideology, culture, and the process of schooling. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Habermas, J. (1987). Lectures on the philosophical discourse of modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Heffner, R. D. (Ed.). (1956). Democracy in America (by Alexis de Tocqueville). New York: The Penguin Group.
Hobsbawm, E. (1962). The age of revolution, 1789–1848. London: Sphere Books.
Krugman, P. (2005, February 18). Opinion: Three-card maestro. The New York Times. Retrieved on 9 June 2011, from http://nytimes.com
Krugman, P. (2008) The return of depression economics and the crisis of 2008. New York: Norton publishers.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Toward a radical democratic politics. London: Verso Books.
Orlowski, P. (2008). “That would certainly be spoiling them”: Liberal discourses of social studies teachers and concerns about Aboriginal students. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 31(2), 110–129.
Rorty, R. (1998). Achieving our country: Leftist thought in twentieth-century America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schwarzmantel, J. (1998). The age of ideology: Political ideologies from the American revolution to postmodern times. New York: New York University Press.
Sleeter, C. E. (2004). Context-conscious portraits and context-blind policy. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35(1), 132–136.
Stiglitz, J. (2003). The roaring nineties: A new history of the world’s most prosperous decade. New York: W.W. Norton.
Stiglitz, J. (2008, September 17). How to prevent the next Wall Street crisis, CNN. Retrieved on 9 June 2011, from http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/17/stiglitz.crisis/
Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. London: Oxford University Press.
Zizek, S. (Ed.). (1994). Mapping ideology. London: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Orlowski, P. (2012). What’s Ideology Got to Do With It?. In: Teaching About Hegemony. Explorations of Educational Purpose, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1418-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1418-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1417-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1418-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)