Skip to main content

Policy and Legal Framework for Managing Biosecurity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Biosecurity Across Borders

Abstract

In terms of plant biosecurity management, the world has become smaller, this is evident in the reduced time as well as the increased speed, forms of transport and distance to transmit potential incursions. Borders between nation states are no longer seen as separators but more as the boundaries between the identities of different groups of people who nevertheless communicate with each other. Direct commu­nication between individual regions in different countries is frequent, even when communication between those same countries at an official level may be less frequent. Advancements in transport technologies have increased the movement of people and goods from one region to another. This movement brings along with it positive outcomes, such as trading in or sharing goods, information and services, but also negative outcomes such as the introduction of pests and diseases. The latter, of course, designates the focus of this chapter, which is on the policy and legal frameworks in which biosecurity currently rests. However, while policy and legal frameworks are potential facilitators of, or impediments to, effective national and international biosecurity, it is presently not understood what these are, who the originating bodies are, nor how policies at national, regional and local levels mesh (or not) to produce effective biosecurity management.

Effective management of biosecurity lies in the hands of many players: international, national and local. This chapter provides an introduction to existing policy and legal frameworks for biosecurity that are presently in force, and finishes by outlining some of the key issues that are suggested by these influences. The international framework starts with a discussion about International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) which is the international framework regarding policy and strategy in regards to integration of national plant biosecurity policymaking. It continues by describing the UN Convention on Biodiversity which sets down some principles of engagement for policy sectors at all levels, and of particular relevance for this chapter, provides guidelines for how they should work with local communities who, in turn, possess the local knowledge that in many cases has already effectively managed biosecurity in regional areas. The guiding question addressed in the chapter is: What are the prevailing international, national, and local policy and legal frameworks impacting on effective management of biosecurity? Related to this is the practical question of what can be done to improve the effectiveness of bio­security management using these frameworks? The findings of research undertaken to address these questions, including the need for improved local government capacity in dealing with international policy frameworks, suggest the need for a new develop­ment paradigm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agustino, L. (2006). Politik dan kebijakan publik [Politics and public policy]. Bandung: Penerbit AIPI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beale, R., Fairbrother, J., Inglis, A., & Trebeck, D. (2008). One biosecurity: A working partnership. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved April 10, 2010, from http://www.quarantinebiosecurityreview.gov.au/report_to_the_minister_for_agriculture_fisheries_and_forestry.

  • Christie, M. (2008). Traditional Aboriginal knowledge practices and North Australian biosecurity. Kritis-Learning Communities, Special Co-publication, 64–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Forestry. (2007). Import risk analysis handbook. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Forestry. (2009). Frequently ask questions: Review of Australia’s quarantine and biosecurity arrangements. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved April 10, 2010, from http://www.daff.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/1454032/beale-faqs.pdf

  • Department of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Forestry. (2010). About Biosecurity Services Group: What are the changes? Retrieved April 10, 2010, from http://www.daff.gov.au/bsg/biosecurity-services-group

  • Easton, D. (1965). A system analysis of political life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, I., et al. (2008). Community management of biosecurity: Overview of some Indonesian studies. Kritis-Learning Communities, Special Co-publication, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2008). FAO biosecurity toolkit. Geneva: STDF Workshop on SPS Capacity Evaluation Tools.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO-WTO. (2005). Understanding the Codex Alimentarius. Rome: FAO-WTO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora, C. B. (2008). Social capital and community problem solving combining local and scientific knowledge to fight invasive species. Kritis-Learning Communities, Special Co-publication, 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, T. L. (2006). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerke, S., & Evers, H. D. (2006). Globalizing local knowledge: Social science research on Southeast Asia, 1970–2000. Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 1(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, C. (2009, September 30). The Beale review: Implementing one biosecurity. Society for Risk Analysis Conference, Australian Government, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwantoro, S. (2006, November 2). The role of agriculture quarantine agency of Indonesia (AQAI) as a trade instrument in global trade liberalization. PowerPoint presentation in Nanning, China, Director General of Agriculture Quarantine Agency of Indonesia, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwantoro, S. (2007). Issues and concerns affecting biosecurity in Indonesia. PowerPoint presentation, Director General of Agriculture Quarantine Agency of Indonesia, Jakarta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelkar, M. (2007). Local knowledge and natural resource management: A gender perspective. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 14(2), 295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J. P., & Stewart, J., Jr. (2000). Public policy: An evolutionary approach. Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litaay, T. (2007). Kemendesakan perlindungan pengetahuan tradisional di Indonesia [Urgency of protecting Indonesian traditional knowledge]. In D. Louhenapessy et al. (Eds.), Workshop proceeding: Biosecurity and indigenous knowledge. Salatiga: PSKTI, UKSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariana, D. (2006). Menyingkap tabir segitiga politik – kebijakan publik – administrasi publik [Unfolding the triangle screen of politics, public policy, and public administration]. In L. Agustino (Ed.), Politik dan kebijakan publik [Politics and public policy]. Bandung: Penerbit AIPI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marifa, I. (2005). Institutional transformation for better policy implementation and enforcement. In B. P. Resosudarmo (Ed.), The politics and economics of Indonesia’s natural resources. Singapore: ISEAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchtadi, D. N. D. (2007). Keamanan pangan produk hasil rekayasa genetik [Food safety of genetic modified products]. Powerpoint presentation presented at Departement Ilmu dan Teknologi Pangan FATETA, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuhaus, R. J. (1977). Christian faith and public policy. Minneapolis: Augsburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugroho, R. (2009). Public policy. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, K. (1999). The borderless world: Power and strategy in the interlinked economy. London: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resosudarmo, B. P., & Jotzo, F. (2009). Development, resources, and environment in Eastern Indonesia. In B. P. Resosudarmo & F. Jotzo (Eds.), Working with nature against poverty: Development, resources and the environment in eastern Indonesia. Singapore: ISEAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resosudarmo, B. P., Napitupulu, L., Manning, C. H., & Wanggai, V. (2009). Papua I: Challenges of economic development in an era of political and economic change. In B. P. Resosudarmo & F. Jotzo (Eds.), Working with nature against poverty: Development, resources and the environment in eastern Indonesia. Singapore: ISEAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sardjono, A. (2006). Hak kekayaan intelektual dan pengetahuan tradisional [Intellectual property rights and traditional knowledge]. Bandung: Penerbit Alumni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suddith, P. (2008, December 2–3). Protecting traditional creativity and cultural expressions through IP. Powerpoint presentation presented in the second WIPO international conference on intellectual property and the creative industries, Bali

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempo Interaktif. (2004). Pengusaha: Pemusnahan Ayam Tak Selesaikan Masalah [Businessman: Chicken eradication will not solve the problem]. Retrieved June 8, 2009, from http://www.tempointeractive.com/hg/ekbis/2004/02/02/brk,20040202-17,id.html

  • Untung, K. (2007). Kebijakan nasional ketahanan hayati [National biosecurity policy]. In D. Louhenapessy et al. (Eds.), Workshop proceeding: Biosecurity and indigenous knowledge. Salatiga: PSKTI, UKSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Untung, K. (2008). National policy on biological diversity. Kritis-Learning Communities, Special Co-publication, 228–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widja, I. G. N. (2008, December 4). Upaya perlindungan pengetahuan tradisional dan ekspresi budaya tradisional [Efforts in protecting traditional knowledge and traditional culture expression]. Paper presented in National seminar on protection of traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions in creative industry, Bali.

    Google Scholar 

  • WIPO. (2001). Intellectual property needs and expectations of traditional knowledge holders – WIPO report on fact-finding missions on intellectual property and traditional knowledge (1998–1999). Geneva: WIPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2005). Prioritas masalah pertanian di Indonesia [Indonesian agriculture priorities]. In Policy brief – ide-ide program 100 hari, 2 Jan 2005. Retrieved June 8, 2009, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INDONESIA/Resources/Publication/280016-1106130305439/617331-1110769011447/810296-1110769073153/agriculture.pdf

  • WTO. (2006). Article 27.3(B), Relationship between the TRIPs agreement and the CBD, and the protection of traditional knowledge and folklore. Paper presented at the TRIPs (trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights) Council, World Trade Organization, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theofransus Litaay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Litaay, T. (2011). Policy and Legal Framework for Managing Biosecurity. In: Falk, I., Wallace, R., Ndoen, M. (eds) Managing Biosecurity Across Borders. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1412-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics