Abstract
The role of impact assessments in European Union decision-making has increased greatly over the past few years as a part of efforts to boost the Community’s economic performance through improvement of the regulatory environment. In the field of environmental legislation, however, such quantification and monetization efforts involve a number of theoretical and practical problems which could undermine the possibility of obtaining an unbiased outcome. This chapter examines the European Union’s environmental impact assessment practices using the example of the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), the European Union’s new chemicals policy. As a highly significant piece of legislation the likely effects of REACH were subjected to thorough analysis by the European Commission as well as key stakeholders. It is shown that, while underpinning the expected positive overall outcome of the regulation, uncertainty involved in estimating the benefits results in limited applicability of the impact assessment’s findings in the decision-making process and contributes to the fact that REACH was finally adopted with substantially lower requirements than originally planned.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
An overview of these studies (as well as other useful information on REACH) can be found on the European Commission’s website at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/reach/background/i_a_en.htm
References
Ackerman F, Heinzerling L and Massey R (2004) Applying Cost-Benefit to Past Decisions: Was Environmental Protection Ever a Good Idea? Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 576161 Georgetown University
Bolt J, Boon I, Collignon M, van Dijk S, Elting T, van der Kolk J, Luijten J, Ronday R, Stork EJ and Wieling A (2005) REACH – Further Work on Impact Assessment: A Case Study Approach Amsterdam, KPMG Business Advisory Services
Cefic (2004) REACH – Approach of the European Chemical Industry to an Effective New Chemicals Policy for Europe Brussels, Cefic
ChemSec (2004) Cry Wolf – Predicted Costs by Industry in the Face of New Regulations Göteborg, International Chemical Secretariat
Driesen DM (2005) Is Cost-Benefit Analysis Neutral? Working Paper Series Syracuse, Syracuse University College of Law
European Commission (2001a) White Paper – Strategy for a Future Chemicals Policy COM(2001)88 Brussels, European Commission
European Commission (2001b) A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development COM(2001)264 Brussels, European Commission
European Commission (2002) Communication from the Commission on Impact Assessment COM(2002)276 Brussels, European Commission
European Commission (2003a) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), Establishing a European Chemicals Agency and Amending Directive 1999/45/EC and Regulation (EC) {on Persistent Organic Pollutants COM(2003)644 Brussels, European Commission
European Commission (2003b) Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), Establishing a European Chemicals Agency and Amending Directive 1999/45/EC and Regulation (EC) {on Persistent Organic Pollutants} Extended Impact Assessment SEC 2003/1171/3 Brussels, European Commission
European Commission (2005a) Working Together for Growth and Jobs: A New Start for the Lisbon Strategy COM(2005)24 Brussels, European Commission
European Commission (2005b) Better Regulation for Growth and Jobs in the European Union COM(2005)97 Brussels, European Commission
European Commission (2006) Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), Establishing a European Chemicals Agency, Amending Directive 1999/45/EC and Repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC
European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (2005) Implementation of REACH in the New European Member States [online] [cited 15 July 2008]. Available from Internet URL <http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/reach/docs/reach/ipts_summary.pdf>
European Parliament (2006) Parliament Adopts REACH – New EU Chemicals Legislation and New Chemicals Agency [online] [cited 15 July 2008]. Available from Internet URL <http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?language=EN&type=IM-PRESS&reference=20061213IPR01493>
European Union (2005) REACH: High Level Group Meets to Assess New Impact Studies [online] [cited 15 July 2008]. Available from Internet URL <http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/05/495&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en>
FoEE, EEB, Eurocoop, Greenpeace, Health and Environment Alliance, WWF, WECF (2006) REACH, a Deal Too Far [online] [cited 15 July 2008]. Available from Internet URL <http://www.chemsec.org/images/stories/news_publications/061201_REACH_deal_NGOs.pdf>
Franz J and Kirkpatrick C (2007) Integrating sustainable development into European policymaking Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 9.2 141–160
Gowdy J and Erickson J (2005) The approach of ecological economics Cambridge Journal of Economics 29.2 207–222
Mandelkern Group on Better Regulation (2001) Final Report [online] [cited 15 July 2008]. Available from Internet URL <http://ec.europa.eu/governance/impact/docs/key_docs/mandelkern_report_en.pdf>
Martinez-Alier J (1995) Distributional Issues in Ecological Economics Review of Social Economy 53.4 511–528
O’Neill J and Spash CL (2000) Conceptions of Value in Environmental Decision-Making Environmental Values 9 521–536
Pallemaerts M, Wilkinson D, Bowyer C, Brown J, Farmer A, Farmer M, Herodes M, Hjerp P, Miller C, Monkhouse C, Skinner I, ten Brink P and Adelle C (2006) Drowning in Process? The Implementation of the EU’s 6th Environmental Action Programme Report for the European Environmental Bureau London, IEEP
Pedersen F, Samsøe-Petersen L, Gustavson K, Höglund L, Koundouri P and Pearce D (2005) The Impact of REACH on the Environment and Human Health Report to DG Environment, Hørsholm, DHI Water & Environment
Reihlen A and Lüskow H (2007) Analysis of Studies Discussing the Benefits of REACH Institut für Ökologie und Politik GmbH
Renda A (2006) Impact Assessment in the EU. The State of the Art and the Art of the State Brussels, Centre for European Policy Studies
Rennie D (2005) ‘Most controversial European law’ wins parliamentary approval The Daily Telegraph 18 November [online] [cited 15 July 2008]. Available from Internet URL <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/1503325/Most-controversial-European-law-wins-parliamentary-approval.html>
The Evaluation Partnership (2007) Evaluation of the Commission’s Impact Assessment System Richmond, The Evaluation Partnership Ltd.
Vatn A and Bromley D (1994) Choices without prices without apologies Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26 129–148
Witmond B, Groot S, Groen W, Dönszelmann E (2004) The Impact of REACH – Overview of 36 Studies The Hague, ECORYS – OpdenKamp Adviesgroep
WWF (2006) Briefing on DG ENV Study – Benefits of REACH [online] [cited 15 July 2008]. Available from Internet URL http://assets.panda.org/downloads/wwf_summary_of_ec_benefit_study_feb_06.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Széchy, A. (2011). Impact Assessment in the European Union: The Example of the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). In: Burritt, R., Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Pohjola, T., Csutora, M. (eds) Environmental Management Accounting and Supply Chain Management. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1390-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1390-1_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1389-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1390-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)