Skip to main content

Impact Assessment in the European Union: The Example of the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmental Management Accounting and Supply Chain Management

Part of the book series: Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science ((ECOE,volume 27))

Abstract

The role of impact assessments in European Union decision-making has increased greatly over the past few years as a part of efforts to boost the Community’s economic performance through improvement of the regulatory environment. In the field of environmental legislation, however, such quantification and monetization efforts involve a number of theoretical and practical problems which could undermine the possibility of obtaining an unbiased outcome. This chapter examines the European Union’s environmental impact assessment practices using the example of the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), the European Union’s new chemicals policy. As a highly significant piece of legislation the likely effects of REACH were subjected to thorough analysis by the European Commission as well as key stakeholders. It is shown that, while underpinning the expected positive overall outcome of the regulation, uncertainty involved in estimating the benefits results in limited applicability of the impact assessment’s findings in the decision-making process and contributes to the fact that REACH was finally adopted with substantially lower requirements than originally planned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An overview of these studies (as well as other useful information on REACH) can be found on the European Commission’s website at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/reach/background/i_a_en.htm

References

  • Ackerman F, Heinzerling L and Massey R (2004) Applying Cost-Benefit to Past Decisions: Was Environmental Protection Ever a Good Idea? Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 576161 Georgetown University

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolt J, Boon I, Collignon M, van Dijk S, Elting T, van der Kolk J, Luijten J, Ronday R, Stork EJ and Wieling A (2005) REACH – Further Work on Impact Assessment: A Case Study Approach Amsterdam, KPMG Business Advisory Services

    Google Scholar 

  • Cefic (2004) REACH – Approach of the European Chemical Industry to an Effective New Chemicals Policy for Europe Brussels, Cefic

    Google Scholar 

  • ChemSec (2004) Cry Wolf – Predicted Costs by Industry in the Face of New Regulations Göteborg, International Chemical Secretariat

    Google Scholar 

  • Driesen DM (2005) Is Cost-Benefit Analysis Neutral? Working Paper Series Syracuse, Syracuse University College of Law

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001a) White Paper – Strategy for a Future Chemicals Policy COM(2001)88 Brussels, European Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001b) A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development COM(2001)264 Brussels, European Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002) Communication from the Commission on Impact Assessment COM(2002)276 Brussels, European Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003a) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), Establishing a European Chemicals Agency and Amending Directive 1999/45/EC and Regulation (EC) {on Persistent Organic Pollutants COM(2003)644 Brussels, European Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003b) Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), Establishing a European Chemicals Agency and Amending Directive 1999/45/EC and Regulation (EC) {on Persistent Organic Pollutants} Extended Impact Assessment SEC 2003/1171/3 Brussels, European Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005a) Working Together for Growth and Jobs: A New Start for the Lisbon Strategy COM(2005)24 Brussels, European Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005b) Better Regulation for Growth and Jobs in the European Union COM(2005)97 Brussels, European Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006) Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), Establishing a European Chemicals Agency, Amending Directive 1999/45/EC and Repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (2005) Implementation of REACH in the New European Member States [online] [cited 15 July 2008]. Available from Internet URL <http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/reach/docs/reach/ipts_summary.pdf>

  • European Parliament (2006) Parliament Adopts REACH – New EU Chemicals Legislation and New Chemicals Agency [online] [cited 15 July 2008]. Available from Internet URL <http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?language=EN&type=IM-PRESS&reference=20061213IPR01493>

  • European Union (2005) REACH: High Level Group Meets to Assess New Impact Studies [online] [cited 15 July 2008]. Available from Internet URL <http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/05/495&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en>

  • FoEE, EEB, Eurocoop, Greenpeace, Health and Environment Alliance, WWF, WECF (2006) REACH, a Deal Too Far [online] [cited 15 July 2008]. Available from Internet URL <http://www.chemsec.org/images/stories/news_publications/061201_REACH_deal_NGOs.pdf>

  • Franz J and Kirkpatrick C (2007) Integrating sustainable development into European policymaking Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 9.2 141–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowdy J and Erickson J (2005) The approach of ecological economics Cambridge Journal of Economics 29.2 207–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelkern Group on Better Regulation (2001) Final Report [online] [cited 15 July 2008]. Available from Internet URL <http://ec.europa.eu/governance/impact/docs/key_docs/mandelkern_report_en.pdf>

  • Martinez-Alier J (1995) Distributional Issues in Ecological Economics Review of Social Economy 53.4 511–528

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill J and Spash CL (2000) Conceptions of Value in Environmental Decision-Making Environmental Values 9 521–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallemaerts M, Wilkinson D, Bowyer C, Brown J, Farmer A, Farmer M, Herodes M, Hjerp P, Miller C, Monkhouse C, Skinner I, ten Brink P and Adelle C (2006) Drowning in Process? The Implementation of the EU’s 6th Environmental Action Programme Report for the European Environmental Bureau London, IEEP

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen F, Samsøe-Petersen L, Gustavson K, Höglund L, Koundouri P and Pearce D (2005) The Impact of REACH on the Environment and Human Health Report to DG Environment, Hørsholm, DHI Water & Environment

    Google Scholar 

  • Reihlen A and Lüskow H (2007) Analysis of Studies Discussing the Benefits of REACH Institut für Ökologie und Politik GmbH

    Google Scholar 

  • Renda A (2006) Impact Assessment in the EU. The State of the Art and the Art of the State Brussels, Centre for European Policy Studies

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie D (2005) ‘Most controversial European law’ wins parliamentary approval The Daily Telegraph 18 November [online] [cited 15 July 2008]. Available from Internet URL <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/1503325/Most-controversial-European-law-wins-parliamentary-approval.html>

  • The Evaluation Partnership (2007) Evaluation of the Commission’s Impact Assessment System Richmond, The Evaluation Partnership Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatn A and Bromley D (1994) Choices without prices without apologies Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26 129–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witmond B, Groot S, Groen W, Dönszelmann E (2004) The Impact of REACH – Overview of 36 Studies The Hague, ECORYS – OpdenKamp Adviesgroep

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF (2006) Briefing on DG ENV Study – Benefits of REACH [online] [cited 15 July 2008]. Available from Internet URL http://assets.panda.org/downloads/wwf_summary_of_ec_benefit_study_feb_06.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Széchy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Széchy, A. (2011). Impact Assessment in the European Union: The Example of the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). In: Burritt, R., Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Pohjola, T., Csutora, M. (eds) Environmental Management Accounting and Supply Chain Management. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1390-1_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics