Abstract
Implementation of the Water Framework Directive entails several tasks for European Union member states including Hungary. One important issue is the estimation of economic benefits resulting from improvement of water quality and condition. Contingent valuation has been used in Hungary in two pilot areas: the natural river Túr and the artificial and less important Kállay Channel. Both areas can be found in the north-east of the country. Household willingness to pay for an improvement in the state of the water bodies is similar for both; most are ready to dedicate only a small proportion of their monthly income, equivalent to 0.5%. The relatively high proportion of zero offers can be mainly explained by the low level of income characteristic of the surveyed areas. The results of the survey can be used in a cost-benefit analysis to provide a basis for future programmes as well as coordinating international efforts for improving the water quality of catchment areas. In addition, companies also can make use of those results for their environmental performance evaluation processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The research was carried out in the frame of the project titled ‘Promoting Implementation of Water Framework Directive Phase II. (2006–2007)’. The principal was Ministry of Environment and Water Affairs, the implementer was the consortium lead by ÖKO Zrt. (members: Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Water Utility and Environmental Engineering; VTK Innosystem Water, Nature and Environment Protection Ltd.; ARCADIS Euroconsult BV).
References
Alvarez-Farizo B, Hanley NR and Barberán AL (2007) Choice modelling at the “market stall”: individual versus collective interest in environmental valuation Ecological Economics 60.4 743–751
Atkins JP and Burdon D (2006) An initial economic evaluation of water quality improvements in the Randers Fjord, Denmark Marine Pollution Bulletin 53.1-4 195–204
Bateman IJ, Cole MA, Georgiu S and Hadley DJ (2006) Comparing contingent valuation and contingent ranking: a case study considering the benefits of urban river quality improvements Journal of Environmental Management 79.3 221–231
Boxall PC, Adamowitz WL, Swait J, Williams M and Louviere J (1996) A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation Ecological Economics 18.3 243–253
Epstein MJ (2008) Making Sustainability Work, Best Practices in Managing and Measuring Corporate Social, Environmental, and Economic Impacts UK, Greenleaf Publishing
Freeman III AM (1994) The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods Washington DC, Resources for the Future
Fucskó J, Garrod G, Powell J and Valené Kelemen Á (2001) A Szigetköz és a Dunakanyar Természeti Tőkéjének Értékelése (The Economic Valuation of Natural Resources in Szigetköz and Dunakanyar) Budapest, MAKK
Garrod G and Willis KG (1999) Economic Valuation of the Environment. Methods and Case Studies Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Hanley N, Wright RE and Alvarez-Farizo B (2006a) Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the water framework directive Journal of Environmental Management 78.2 183–193
Hanley N, Colombo S, Tinch D, Black A and Aftab A (2006b) Estimating the benefits of water quality improvements under the Water Framework Directive: are benefits transferable? European Review of Agricultural Economics 33.3 391–413
Hoevenagel R (1994) The Contingent Valuation Method: Scope and Validity, Ph.D. ThesisAmsterdam Free University
Magnussen K (1992) Valuation of reduced water pollution using the contingent valuation method – testing for mental accounts and amenity misspecification in Navrud S Pricing the European Environment Oslo, Scandinavian University Press 195–230
Mitchell RC and Carson RT (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method Washington DC, Resources for the Future
Mourato S, Csutora M, Marjainé Szerényi Zs, Pearce D, Kerekes S and Kovács E (1997) The value of water quality improvement at Lake Balaton: a contingent valuation study (ch. 6) in Measurement and Achievement of Sustainable Development in Eastern Europe Report to DGXII Budapest, Budapest Academy of Economic Sciences, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and Cracow Academy of Economics
Progress Report No. 3, Annex 21 (2006) Promoting Implementation of Water Framework Directive Phase II: Description of the case study areas, results of the ecological survey and proposals to take measures (available only in Hungarian)
Santos JML (1998) The Economic Valuation of Landscape Change. Theory and Policies for Land Use and Conservation Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Szerényi, Z.M., Zsóka, Á., Rákosi, J. (2011). Implementation of Water Framework Directive Obligations in Hungary: Estimating Benefits of Development Activities in Two Pilot Areas. In: Burritt, R., Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Pohjola, T., Csutora, M. (eds) Environmental Management Accounting and Supply Chain Management. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1390-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1390-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1389-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1390-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)