Abstract
According to the crucial importance of innovation for modern economies, the role of graduates regarding innovation appears to be a major topic when their performances in the labour market at stake. Five main questions are addressed in this chapter: (1) What does innovation mean? (2) Which organisations are likely to be more innovative? (3) What role do Higher Education graduates play regarding innovation? (4) Are they equipped to do develop innovation? (5) Which are the occupations more related to innovation, and are innovative activities rewarded? The results presented in this chapter confirm that higher education graduates are crucial actors in the innovation process. The jobs of innovative graduates show a number of specific characteristics: a high level of autonomy, more leeway to define their own goals and to perform their tasks. A paradox that emerged is the following: although innovation is more strongly developed in large organisations, small organisations offer graduates more opportunities to play a role in introducing innovations. When earnings are considered, innovative activities appear to be rewarded, in the private sector. That confirms the impression that innovation is recognised as valuable by organisations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen, J., & van der Velden, R. (2005). The Flexible Professional in the Knowledge Society: Conceptual Framework of the REFLEX Project, REFLEX Working paper 1, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Canberra Manual (1995). The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Manual on the measurement of human resources devoted to S&T “Canberra Manual”. Paris: OECD.
Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society (2nd ed., Vol. I). Cambridge, MA; Oxford: Blackwell (1996).
Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.
Drucker, P. (1959). Landmarks of tomorrow: A report on the new post-modern world. New York: Harper.
Duru-Bellat, M. (2006). L’inflation scolaire: Les désillusions de la méritocratie. Paris: Seuil.
European Innovation Scoreboard. (2006). Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance, Pro Inno Europe, Innometrics, available on internet http://www.proinno-europe.eu/inno-metrics.html
Foray, D. (2000). L’économie de la connaissance. Paris: La Découverte.
Frascati manual. (2002). Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. Paris: OECD.
Oslo Manual. (2002). The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. OECD, European Commission, Eurostat, Second edition, Available on Internet: http://www.oecd.org
Reich, R. (1991). The work of nations, preparing ourselves for the 21st century capitalism. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wolf, A. (2003). Does education matter: Myths about education and economic growth? London: Penguin Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: To What Extent Innovative Activities Are Related to a Specific Working Environment?
Appendix: To What Extent Innovative Activities Are Related to a Specific Working Environment?
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paul, JJ. (2011). Graduates in the Knowledge and Innovation Society. In: Allen, J., van der Velden, R. (eds) The Flexible Professional in the Knowledge Society. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 35. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1353-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1353-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1352-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1353-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)