Abstract
This article analyzes how leadership development and preparation is conceptualised and contextualised in the national education program for newly appointed school principals in Norway. Our main focus is on exploring whether there are differing epistemological foundations of various approaches to learning-centred school leadership. Our theoretical framework is informed by a review of a variety of studies, which focus on the relationship between leadership and student learning, and by Michael Fullan’s (2001) framework for thinking about and leading complex change. As empirical basis we have selected and compared two different preparatory programs. While both programs have been granted a status as a national leadership program in Norway, they also demonstrate a variation in understanding leadership for school improvement and student learning. The findings also demonstrate some significant differences across providers with regard to perspective and the emphasis on outcomes, and questioning the extent to which the knowledge base is characterised by a combination of educational theories and research on leadership. Despite these distinctions, which are anchored in different epistemological foundations, both programmes are assumed to contribute to the implementation of a national policy for leadership development and training in Norway. Our main argument is that to understand how this is possible, it is important to trace historical and cultural patterns of social development within the Norwegian context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS).
References
Day, C., & Leithwood, K. (Eds.). (2007). Successful principal leadership in times of change: An international perspective. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Gu, Q., et al. (2009). The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes. Research Report DCSF-RR108, Final Report. Department for Children, Schools and Families & National College for School Leadership. http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/DCSF-RR108.pdf.
Elstad, E. (2008). Ansvarliggjøringsmekanismer: Når skoleeier eller pressen stiller skoler til ansvar [Mechanisms of accountability policy]. In G. Langfeldt, E. Elstad, & S. Hopmann (Eds.), Ansvarlighet i skolen. Politiske spørsmål og pedagogiske svar (pp. 204–234). Fagernes, Norway: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Furman, G. C., & Starratt, R. J. (2002). Leadership for democratic community in schools. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century (pp. 105–133). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423–451.
Hopkins, D. (2007). Every school a great school: Realizing the potential of system leadership. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Knapp, M., Copland, M., & Talbert, J. (2003). Leading for learning: Reflective tools for school and district leaders. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teacher and Policy.
Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2005). What we know about successful school leadership. In W. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda: Directions for research on educational leadership (pp. 22–47). New York: Teachers College Press.
MacBeath, J., Swaffield, S., & Frost, D. (2009). Principled narrative. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12(3), 223–238.
Møller, J. (2009). School leadership in an age of accountability: Tensions between managerial and professional accountability. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2), 37–46.
Møller, J., & Schratz, M. (2008). Leadership development in Europe. In G. Crow, J. Lumby, & P. Pashiardis (Eds.), UCEA/BELMAS/CCEAM International handbook on the preparation and development of school leaders (pp. 341–367). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Publishing Company.
Olsen, J. P. (2002). Towards a European administrative space? (26). Oslo, Norway: Arena – Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo.
Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving school leadership (Vol. 1). Paris: OECD publications.
Report No. 31 to the Storting. (2007/2008). Kvalitet i skolen. Oslo, Norway: Kunnskapsdepartementet. [White paper to the Norwegian Parliament, No. 31 (2007/2008). Quality in Schools. The Royal Ministry of Education and Research].
Robinson, V. M., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674.
Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Imprint.
Tjeldvoll, A. (2008). School management: Norwegian legacies bowing to new public management. Managing Global Transitions, 6(2), 177–205.
Tjeldvoll, A., Wales, C., & Welle-Strand, A. (2005). School leadership training under globalisation: Comparisons of the UK, the US and Norway. Managing Global Transitions, 3(1), 23–49.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Møller, J., Ottesen, E. (2011). Building Leadership Capacity: The Norwegian Approach. In: Townsend, T., MacBeath, J. (eds) International Handbook of Leadership for Learning. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1350-5_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1350-5_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1349-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1350-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)