Skip to main content

US Cultural History: Visible and Invisible Influences on Leadership for Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Leadership for Learning

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 25))

Abstract

Every nation has a unique cultural history. In the United States, political governance (e.g., public welfare) and economic power (e.g., property rights) have not only dominated educational reform discourses, but also have vied continuously to influence and reframe debates on leadership for learning. As such, a knowledge of US cultural history should be important to educational leaders, most notably to provide school administrators with a cultural perspective for interpreting current practices and policies – and not see current educational reform(s) only within the narrow context of the present. The problem is that educators and researchers live and work in the present and, thus, have never had any educational experiences except what they know as educational reform policies and practices. Educators today have been unduly influenced by powerful economic forces, billionaire philanthropists, foundations, and ideological think tanks, rather than by the many on-the-ground local school leaders. This chapter asks, what would past US revolutionaries, James Madison, Horace Mann, John Dewey, Elsie Clapp, and Alice Miel, say about educational leadership and reforms today?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 669.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This timeframe, a span of over 200 years, is obviously too ambitious for a single chapter – as a documented history. But the purpose of this chapter is not to provide an historical analysis of school leadership, but rather the purpose is to demonstrate the significance for the field of school leadership to embrace both history and culture. Specifically, I will explain how school leadership practices and K-12 policies have been and will continue to be influenced by a nation’s history and culture.

  2. 2.

    Writing in 1776, before the system of public education had been established in the United States, the Scottish economist Adam Smith wrote: “The expense of the institutions for education and religious instruction, is likewise, no doubt, beneficial to the whole society, and may, therefore, without injustice, be defrayed by the general contributions of the whole society” (p. 488).

  3. 3.

    This is not the time to engage in the ongoing debate over the role that schools play in the overall education of a society. Both schools and social systems of education matter and make a difference. What is relevant to this discussion is to make visible inclusive arguments linking schools to social development. To quote Jacques Barzun (1954) in Teacher in America (New York: Doubleday), “Teaching is not a lost art but the regard for teaching is a lost tradition” (p. 16). The role of cultural history for educational leadership is to keep true American traditions of all generations alive for discussion and debate.

  4. 4.

    From 1976 to 2005, Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) scores for the verbal sections were flat: from 509 to 508; in math, however, the scores rose from 497 to 520, but then have dropped to 515. Likewise, verbal scores have dropped to 502 by 2007. Source: National Center for Educational Statistics.

References

  • American Institute of Research. (2006). Gates foundation’s high school grants initiative: 2001–2005. Final Report (Gates evaluation http://www.air.org/publications/pubs_ehd_school_reform.aspx).

  • Barzun, J. (1954). Teacher in America. New York: Doubleday & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzun, J. (1959). The house of intellect. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, S., & Bogotch, I. (2006). Modeling site-based decision-making: School practices in the age of accountability. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(5), 446–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beard, C., & Beard, M. (1939). America in midpassage (Vol. II). New York: MacMillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, M. I. (1956/1980). The settlement, the immigrant and the public school. New York: Arno Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blount, J. (2008). History as a way of understanding and motivating. In I. Bogotch, F. Beachum, J. Blount, J. Brooks, & F. English (Eds.), Radicalizing educational leadership: Dimensions of social justice (pp. 17–38). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodilly, S. (1998). Lessons from new American schools’ scale-up phase: Prospects for bringing designs to multiple schools. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogotch, I. (2004/2011). A history of public school leadership: The first century, 1837–1942. In F. English (Ed.), Sage handbook on educational leadership. (pp. 7–33). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogotch, I. (2006). Horace Mann. In F. English (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational leadership and administration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. http://sage-ereference.com.ezproxy.fau.edu/edleadership/Article_n359.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogotch, I., & Taylor, D. (1993). Discretionary assessment practices: Professional judgments and principals’ actions. The Urban Review, 25(4), 289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, R. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. L., King, R. B., Spiro, C., & Steuerle C. E. (2001). Federal expenditures on children: 1960–1997. http://www.urban.org/publications/310309.html.

  • Cremins, L. (1965). Foreword. In F. Carlton (Ed.), Economic influences upon educational progress in the United States, 1820–1850 (1905) (pp. ix–xviii). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowson, R., & Goldring, E. (2009). The new localism in American education. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donmoyer, R., & Galloway, F. (2010). Reconsidering the utility of case study designs for researching school reform in a neo-scientific era: Insights from a multiyear, mixed-methods study. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J. (2007). American creation. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, F. (2006). John Dewey. In F. English (Ed.) Encyclopedia of educational leadership and administration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. <http://sage-ereference.com.ezproxy.fau.edu/edleadership/Article_n169.html>. The Federalist Papers (1787–1788/2003). New York: Bantam Classic reissue.

  • Giroux, H. (2009). Youth in a suspect society: Democracy or disposability? New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glennan, T., Jr. (1998). New American schools after six years. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goals. (2000). Educate America act (P.L. 103-227) (March 31, 1994). 103rd U.S. Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, H. (1996/1997). Equal opportunity and the federal role in education: A response to the conservative attack. Rethinking Schools Online, 11(2). http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/11_02/Kantor.shtml#9.

  • Lieberman, M. (1960/1962). The myth of local control. In C. Gross, S. Wronski, & J. Hanson (Eds.), Social and society: Readings in the social and philosophical foundations of education (pp. 99–108). Boston: D.C. Heath and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacBeath, J. (2008). Leadership for learning: Concluding thoughts. In J. MacBeath & Y. C. Cheng (Eds.), Leadership for learning: International perspectives (pp. 327–334). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miel, A. (1961). Creativity in teaching. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rado, D. (2010, February 4). Teacher morale scores plunge at majority of DISD schools, survey finds. The Dallas Morning News. http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/education/stories/DN-disdmorale04met.ART0.Central.Edition1.4ba31e1.html

  • Rowan, B., Correnti, R., Miller, R., & Camburn, E. (2009). School improvement by design: Lessons form a study of comprehensive school reform programs. Consortium for Policy Research in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rush, B. (1798/1947/1962). The views of a founding father on education. In C. Gross, S. Wronski, & J. Hanson (Eds.), Social and society: Readings in the social and philosophical foundations of education (pp. 93–99). Boston: D.C. Heath and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seldes, G. (1947). 1000 Americans. New York: Boni & Gaer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1776/1991). Wealth of nations. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, S. (2004). Elsie Ripley Clapp (1979–1965): Her life and the community school. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. (1998). Trust in schools: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(4), 334–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wonycott, A., & Bogotch, I. (2000). Measuring reculturing in national reform models. Journal of School Leadership, 10(2), 131–157.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I want to thank the many critical friends of this manuscript: Jacqueline Ackerina, Catherine Lugg, Daniel Reyes-Guerra, Tommy Tucker, Marianne Russo, Thelma Shapiro, Scott Smith, and Evana Tamayo.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ira Bogotch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bogotch, I. (2011). US Cultural History: Visible and Invisible Influences on Leadership for Learning. In: Townsend, T., MacBeath, J. (eds) International Handbook of Leadership for Learning. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1350-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics