Advertisement

Slender Retaining Walls

  • Milutin SrbulovEmail author
Chapter
  • 1.6k Downloads
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological, and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 20)

Abstract

Slender retaining walls have emerged with developments in reinforced concrete and steel production as they use their flexural stiffness to transfer nearly horizontal active lateral soil forces on the wall into nearly horizontal passive forces onto the ground in front of wall. Sketches of cross sections of slender retaining walls are shown in Fig. 8.1. The walls are also called embedded.

Keywords

Peak Particle Velocity Undrained Condition Embedment Depth Sheet Pile Acceleration Response Spectrum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Atik LA, Sitar N (2009) Experimental and analytical study of the seismic performance of retaining structures. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre report PEER 2008/104 http://peer.berkeley.edu/publications/peer_reports/reports_2008/reports_2008.html
  2. BS 5228-2 (2009) Code of practice for noise and vibration control on construction and open sites – part 2: vibration. British Standards InstitutionGoogle Scholar
  3. Burland JB, Potts DM, Walsh NM (1981) The overall stability of free and propped embedded cantilever retaining wall. Ground Eng ICE 7:23–38Google Scholar
  4. Chang CY, Power MS, Mok CM, Tang YK, Tang HT (1990) Analysis of dynamic lateral earth pressures recorded on Lotung reactor containment model structure. In: Proceedings of the 4th U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering, Palm Springs, CAGoogle Scholar
  5. EN 1998-5 (2004) Eurocode 8 – design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 5: foundations, retaining structures and geotechnical aspects. European Committee for Standardization, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  6. Gazetas G, Psarropoulos PN, Anastasopoulos I, Gerolymos N (2004) Seismic behaviour of flexible retaining systems subjected to short-duration moderately strong excitation. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 24: 537–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gazetas G, Gerolymos N, Anastasopoulos I (2005) Response of three Athens metro underground structures in the 1999 Parnitha earthquake. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 25:617–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Green RA, Olgun CG, Ebeling RM, Cameron WI (2003) Seismically induced lateral earth pressures on a cantilever retaining wall. In: Beavers J (ed) Proceedings of the 6th US conference and workshop on lifeline earthquake engineering. TCLEE Monograph No. 25. ASCE, Long Beach, CA, pp 946–955Google Scholar
  9. Iai S, Kameoka T (1993) Finite element analysis of earthquake induced damage of anchored sheet pile quay walls. Soils Foundations 33(1):71–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lew M, Simantob E, Hudson ME (1995) Performance of shored earth retaining systems during the January 17, 1994, Northridge earthquake. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, St. Louis, MO, p 3Google Scholar
  11. Siddharthan R, Maragakis EM (1989) Performance of flexible retaining walls supporting dry cohesionless soils under cyclic loads. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 13: 309–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Veletsos AS, Younan AH (1997) Dynamic response of cantilever retaining walls. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 123(2):161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Westergaard H (1931) Water pressure on dams during earthquakes. Trans ASCE 1835:418–433Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UK

Personalised recommendations