Flow of Liquefied Sandy Soil

  • Milutin SrbulovEmail author
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological, and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 20)


Flows caused by liquefaction of sandy slopes and the effects on adjacent structures are among the most significant hazards caused by earthquakes. EN 1998-5 (2004) (and other publications world wide) specifies procedure for determination of liquefaction potential of sandy soil with horizontal or gently inclined surface using an empirical method but not for ground slopes during earthquakes.


Slip Surface Earthquake Magnitude Horizontal Acceleration Liquefaction Potential Soil Liquefaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ambraseys NN (1988) Engineering seismology. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 17:1–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambraseys NN, Menu JM (1988) Earthquake induced ground displacements. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 16:985–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen A, Bjerrum L (1968) Slides in sub aqueous slopes in loose sand and silt. Norwegian Geotechn Inst Publ 81:1–9Google Scholar
  4. Andrus RD, Stokoe KH (1998) Guidelines for evaluation of liquefaction resistance using shear wave velocity. In: Youd Tl, Idriss IM (eds) Proceedings of the 1996 NCEER workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. Salt lake City, Utah, Report No. NCEER-97-0022Google Scholar
  5. Boulanger RW, Idriss IM (2007) Evaluation of cyclic softening in silt and clays. ASCE J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 133:641–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Casagarande A (1965) Second Terzaghi lecture: the role of “calculated risk” in earthwork and foundation engineering. ASCE J Soil Mech Foundations Div 91(SM4):1–40Google Scholar
  7. Castro G (1995) Empirical methods in liquefaction evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 1st annual Leonardo Zeevaert international conference, Mexico City, Mexico, vol 1, pp 1–41Google Scholar
  8. Das BM (1985) Advanced soil mechanics. McGraw-Hill, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  9. De Alba P, Seed HB, Retamal E, Seed RB (1987) Residual strength of sand from dam failures in the Chilean earthquake of March 3, 1985. Earthquake Engineering Research Center Report No. UCB/EERC-87-11, University of California, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  10. De Alba PA, Seed HB, Retamal E, Seed RB (1988) Analyses of dam failures inn 1985 Chilean earthquake. ASCE J Geotechn Eng 114(2):1414–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dean ETR (2010) Offshore geotechnical engineering – principles and practice. Thomas Telford, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Duncan JM (1996) State of the art: limit equilibrium and finite element analysis of slopes. ASCE J Geotechn Eng 122:577–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eckersley D (1990) Instrumented laboratory flowslides. Geotechnique XL(3):489–502Google Scholar
  14. EN 1998-5 (2004) Eurocode 8 – design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 5: foundations, retaining structures and geotechnical aspects. European Committee for Standardization, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamada M, Yasuda S, Isoyama R, Emoto K (1986) Study on liquefaction induced permanent ground displacements. In: Report on the association for the development of earthquake prediction in Japan, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  16. Harder LF Jr, Boulanger R (1997) Application of Kσ and Kα correction factors. In: NCEER workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. Report NCEER-97-0022Google Scholar
  17. Hazen A (1918) A study of the slip in the Calaveras Dam. Eng News Record 81(26):1158–1164Google Scholar
  18. Hazen A (1920) Hydraulic fill dams. Trans Am Soc Civil Eng 1458:1713–1821Google Scholar
  19. Hryciw RD, Vitton S, Thomann TG (1990) Liquefaction and flow failure during seismic exploration. ASCE J Geotechn Eng 116(2):1881–1899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hutchinson JN (1986) A sliding-consolidation model of for flow slides. Canad Geotechn J 23:115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ishihara K (1993) Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. Geotechnique 43(3):351–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jitno H, Byrne PM (1995) Predicted and observed liquefaction response of Mochikoshi tailings dam. In: Proceeding of the 1st international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, vol 2, Tokyo, Japan, pp 1085–1090Google Scholar
  23. Koppejan AW, van Wamelen BM, Weinberg LJH (1948) Coastal flow slides in the Dutch province of Zeeland. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference of soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Rotterdam, Netherlands, pp 89–96Google Scholar
  24. Lee KL, Seed HB, Idriss IM, Makdis FI (1975) Properties of soil in the San Fernando hydraulic fill dams. ASCE J Geotechn Eng Div 101(GT8):801–821Google Scholar
  25. Maksimovic M (1988) General slope stability package for micro computers. In: Proceedings of 6th international conference on numerical methods in geomechanics, vol 3, Innsbruck, pp 2145–2150Google Scholar
  26. Obermeier SF (1996) Using liquefaction induced features for paleoseismic analyses. In: McCalpin (ed) Paleoseismology. Academic, New York, NY, pp 331–396Google Scholar
  27. Ohya S, Iwasaki T, Wakamatsu M (1985) Comparative study of various penetration tests in ground that underwent liquefaction during the 1983 Nihon-Kai-Cjubu and 1964 Niigata earthquakes. In: Proceedings of workshop on in-situ testing methods for evaluation of soil liquefaction susceptibility, vol 1, San Francisco, CA, pp 5–88Google Scholar
  28. Olson SM (2001) Liquefaction analyses of level and sloping ground using field case histories and penetration resistance. PhD thesis, The Graduate College, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (
  29. Olson SM, Stark TD, Walton WH, Castro G (2000) Static liquefaction flow failure of the North Dike of Wachhusett Dam. ASCE J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 126(12):1184–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Robertson PK, Wride CE (1998) Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test. Canad Geotechn J 35:442–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ross GA (1968) Case studies of soil stability problems resulting from earthquakes. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  32. Sasaki Y, Oshiki H, Nishikawa J (1994) Embankment failure caused by the Kushiro-Oki earthquake of January 15, 1993. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on mechanics and foundation engineering, vol 1, New Delhi, India, pp 61–68Google Scholar
  33. Seed HB (1987) Design problems in soil liquefaction. ASCE J Eng Div 113(8):827–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seed RB, Harder LF Jr (1990) SPT based analysis of cyclic pore pressure generation and undrained residual strength. In: Duncan JM (ed) Proceedings of H. Bolton Seed memorial symposium, vol 2. Bi-Tech Publishing, Richmond, BC, Canada, pp 351–376Google Scholar
  35. Seed HB, Lee KL, Idriss IM (1969) Analysis of Sheffield Dam failure. ASCE J Soil Mech Foundations Div 95(SM6):1453–1490Google Scholar
  36. Seed HB, Lee KL, Idriss IM, Makdisi F (1973) Analysis of the slides in the San Fernando Dam during the earthquake of Feb. 9 1971. Earthquake Engineering Research Center report 73-2, University of California, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  37. Seed HB, Lee KL, Idriss IM, Makdisi F (1975) Dynamic analysis of the slides in the Lower San Feranando Dam during the earthquake of February 9, 1971. ASCE J Geotechn Eng Div 101(GT9):889–911Google Scholar
  38. Seed RB, Cetin KO, Moss RES, Kammerer AM, Wu J, Pestana JM, Riemer MF, Sancio RB, Bray JD, Kayen RE, Faris A (2003) Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering: a unified and consistent framework. In: Proceedings of the 26th annual ASCE Los Angeles geotechnical spring seminar, Keynote presentation, H.M.S. Queen Mary, Long Beach, CA, pp 1–71Google Scholar
  39. Srbulov M (2003) On the fast damage propagation through marine soil offshore Newfoundland following Grand Banks earthquake of 1929. Eur Earthquake Eng XVII(3):3–9Google Scholar
  40. Srbulov M (2005) Simple physical models of sand liquefaction and flow failures induced by earthquakes. Eur Earthquake Eng XIX(3):25–37Google Scholar
  41. Srbulov M (2008) Geotechnical earthquake engineering – simplified analyses with case studies and examples. Springer, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  42. Srbulov M (2010) Simple consideration of liquefaction due to earthquakes and flow failures of slopes in sandy soil. Ingegneria Sismica XXVII(3):7–16Google Scholar
  43. Sully JP, Fernandez A, Zalzman S (1995) Back analysis of deformations for case histories involving flow type failures. In: Proceedings of the 3rd conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, vol 1, St. Louis, MO, pp 499–502Google Scholar
  44. Terzaghi K (1956) Varieties of submarine slope failures. In: The 8th Texas conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Austin, Texas, pp 41–55Google Scholar
  45. Tika TE, Vaughan PR, Lemos LJ (1996) Fast shearing of pre-existing shear zones in soil. Geotechnique 46(2):197–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Youd TL, Hansen CM, Bartlett SF (2002) Revised multilinear regression equations for prediction of lateral spread displacement. ASCE J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 128:1007–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UK

Personalised recommendations