Advertisement

Main Ground Motion Sources and Properties

  • Milutin SrbulovEmail author
Chapter
  • 1.6k Downloads
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological, and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 20)

Abstract

Earthquakes and their effects represent the greatest and most frequent influential factor for ground and structural damage. Less damaging and frequent factor of structural damage and effect on people and processes are the industrial activities.

Keywords

Seismic Hazard Slope Failure Earthquake Magnitude High Speed Train Ground Vibration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ambraseys NN (1990) Uniform magnitude re-evaluation of European earthquakes associated with strong motion records. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 19:1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambraseys NN, Jackson JA (1998) Faulting associated with historical and recent earthquakes in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Geophys J Int 133:390–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambraseys NN, Synolakis C (2010) Tsunami catalogues for the Eastern Mediterranean, revisited. J Earthquake Eng 1(3):309–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bahrekazemi M (2004) Train-induced ground vibration and its prediction. PhD thesis, Division of Soil and Rock Mechanics, Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  5. Barneich JA (1985) Vehicle induced ground motion. In: Gazetas G, Selig ET (eds) Vibration problems in geotechnical engineering. Proceedings of ASCE Convention, Detroit, MI, pp 187–202Google Scholar
  6. Carver GA, McCalpin JP (1996) Paleoseismology of compressional tectonic environments. In: McCalpin JP (ed) Paleoseismology. Academic, New York, NY, pp 183–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen P, Chen H (1989) Scaling law and its applications to earthquake statistical relations. Tectonophysics 166:53–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dowding CH (2000) Construction vibration. Reprinted 1996 version. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  9. Eldred PJL, Skipp BP (1998) Vibration on impact. In: Skipp BO (ed) Ground dynamics and man-made processes. The Institution of Civil Engineers, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  10. EN 1998-1 (2004) Eurocode 8 – design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  11. Goltz C (1998) Fractal and chaotic properties of earthquakes (lecture notes in earth science). Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  12. Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1956) Earthquake magnitude: intensity, energy and acceleration. Bull Seismol Soc Am 46:104–145Google Scholar
  13. Hans T, Kanamori H (1979) A moment magnitude scale. J Geophys Res 84:2348–2340Google Scholar
  14. Hiller DM, Crabb GI (2000) Ground borne vibration caused by mechanised construction works. Transport Research Laboratory report 429, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  15. IBC (2009) International Building Code. International Code CouncilGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnston AC (1990) An earthquake strength scale for the media and the public. Earthquakes Volcanoes 22(5):241–216Google Scholar
  17. Kahriman A (2004) Analysis of parameters of ground vibration produced from bench blasting at a limestone quarry. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 24:887–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keefer DK (1984) Landslides caused by earthquakes. Bull Geol Soc Am 95:406–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keller EA (1986) Investigation of active tectonics; use of surfacial earth processes. In: Wallace RE (ed) Active tectonics: studies in geophysics. National Academic Press, Washington, DC, pp 136–147Google Scholar
  20. McCalpin J (1996) Paleoseismology. Academic, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  21. MIL-HDBK (1997) Soil dynamics and special design aspects. U.S. Department of Defence Handbook 1007/3Google Scholar
  22. Obermeier SF (1996) Using liquefaction induced features for paleoseismic analyses. In: McCalpin (ed) Paleoseismology. Academic, New York, NY, pp 331–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rodriguez CE, Bommer JJ, Chandler RJ (1999) Earthquake-induced landslides: 1980–1997. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 18:325–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scholz CH (1990) The mechanics of earthquakes and faulting. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Scholz CH, Aviles C, Wesnousky S (1986) Scaling differences between large intraplate and interplate earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 76:65–70Google Scholar
  26. Srbulov M (2008) Geotechnical earthquake engineering – simplified analyses with case studies and examples. Springer, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  27. Srbulov M (2010) Ground vibration engineering – simplified analyses with case studies and examples. Springer, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stewart IS, Hancock PL (1990) What is a faulty scarp? Episodes 13:256–263Google Scholar
  29. Stewart JP, Chiou S-J, Bray JD, Graves RW, Somerville PG, Abrahamson NA (2001) Ground motion evaluation procedures for performance based design. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley PEER report 2001/09, http://peer.berkeley.edu/publications/peer_reports/reports_2001/reports_2001.html
  30. TRBNAS (1978) Landslides – analysis and control. In: Schuster RL, Krizek RJ (eds) Special Report 176. Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Science, Washington, DC, PosterGoogle Scholar
  31. Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:974–1002Google Scholar
  32. Wiss JF (1981) Construction vibrations: state of the art. ASCE J Geotechn Div 94(9):167–181Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UK

Personalised recommendations