Abstract
Traditional belief is that tunnels are not affected much by earthquakes except if an active tectonic fault moves across a tunnel. Dowding and Rozen (1978) studied the response of 71 tunnels in rock to earthquake motions. The damage ranged from cracking to closure in total 42 cases. Sharma and Judd (1991) compiled a database on the response of 192 tunnels during 85 earthquakes throughout the world; 94 of the tunnels suffered from small to heavy damage. More than half the damage reported was caused by events that exceeded magnitude 7 of the Richter scale, and nearly 75% of the damage reported occurred within 50 km of the earthquake epicentre. There was no damage in tunnels where the horizontal peak ground acceleration was up to 0.2g. In most cases where damage was reported, the peak ground accelerations were larger than 0.4g. The data show that shallow tunnels are at greater risk during earthquakes than deeper tunnels; roughly 60% of the total cases had overburden depths less than 50 m and suffered some damage. Ground type is also important; 79% of the openings excavated in soil were reported to have suffered some damage. Dean et al. (2006) reviewed data of 1108 tunnels worldwide with diameters larger than 3 m, of which only twelve were subjected to earthquakes with magnitudes greater than 6 that caused the peak horizontal ground accelerations in excess of 0.16g since 1980. Only four tunnels were reported damaged none of which had precast concrete tunnel linings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abrahamson N (2003) Model for strain from transient ground motion. In: Proceedings workshop on the effects of earthquake induced transient ground surface deformation on at-grade improvements. CUREE publication No. EDA-04, curee.org/projects/EDA/docs/CUREE-EDA04.pdf, Oakland, CA
Alheid HJ (1994) Seismic response of deep underground openings, chapter 1. In: Bull JW (ed) Soil-structure interaction: numerical analyses and modelling. E&FN Spon. London, UK, pp 1–36
Ambraseys NN, Douglas J, Sigbjornsson R, Berge-Thierry C, Suhadolc P, Costa G, Smit P (2004) European strong motion database – volume 2. The Engineering and Physical Science Research Council of the United Kingdom GR-52114-01
Dean A, Young DJ, Kramer GJE (2006) The use and performance of precast tunnel linings in seismic areas. IAEG paper No 679, The Geological Society of London, UK
Dowding CH, Rozen A (1978) Damage to rock tunnels from earthquake shaking. ASCE J Geotechn Eng Div 104:175–191
EN 1998-1 (2004) Eurocode 8 – design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels
Giek K, Giek R (1997) Engineering formulas, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
Hashash YMA, Hook JJ, Schmidt B, Yao JIC (2001) Seismic design and analysis of underground structures. Tunnel Underground Space Technol 16:247–293
Hashash YMA, Park D, Yao JIC (2005) Ovaling deformations of circular tunnels under seismic loading, an update on seismic design and analysis of underground structures. Tunnel Underground Space Technol 20(5):435–441
Hoeg K (1968) Stresses against underground structural cylinders. ASCE J Soil Mechanics Foundations Div 94(SM4):833–858
Huo H, Bobet A, Fernandez G, Ramirez J (2005) Load transfer mechanism between underground structure and surrounding ground: evaluation of the failure of the Daikai station. ASCE J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 131:1522–1533
Isenberg J (1979) Role of corrosion in water pipeline performance in three US earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the 2nd US national conference on earthquake engineering, Stanford, CA, pp 683–692
Jenkins WM (1989) Theory of structures, chapter 3. In: Blake LS (ed) Civil engineer’s reference book, 4th edn. Butterworth, Oxford, UK, pp 3–16
Kontoe S (2009) Case study: geotechnical structures. Soc Earthquake Civil Eng Dyn UK, Newslett 21(3):12–14
Kontoe S, Zdravkovic L, Potts DM, Menkiti CO (2008) Case study on seismic tunnel response. Canad Geotechn J 45:1743–1764
Kramer GJE, Sedarat H, Kozak A, Liu A, Chai J (2007) Seismic response of precast tunnel linings. In: Proceedings of the conference rapid excavation and tunnelling, Toronto, pp 1225–1242
Malvar LJ, Crawford JE (1998) Dynamic increase factors for concrete. In: 28th Department of Defence explosives safety board seminar, Orlando, FL, pp 1–17
Nakajima Y, Abeki N, Watanabe D (2000) Study on the stability of H/V spectral ratio of micro tremor in short period range for the estimation of dynamic characteristics of surface geology. In: Proceedings of the 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, Auckland, New Zealand. CD-ROM, Paper No. 2904
O’Rourke TD, Bonneau AL (2007) Lifeline performance under extreme loading during earthquakes. In: Pitilakis KD (ed) Proceedings of 4th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Thessalonica, Greece. Springer, New York, NY, pp 407–432
O’Rourke TD, Jeon S-S (1999) Factors affecting the earthquake damage of water distribution systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th US conference on lifeline earthquake engineering, Seattle, WI, pp 379–388
O’Rourke TD, Liu X (1999) Response of buried pipelines subjected to earthquake effects. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research monograph No. 3. University at Buffalo, New York, NY, USA
Paolucci R, Pitilakis K (2007) Seismic risk assessment of underground structures under transient ground deformations. In: Pitilakis KD (ed) Proceedings of 4th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Thessalonica, Greece. Springer, New York, NY, pp 433–459
Penzien J (2000) Seismically induced racking of tunnel linings. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 29:683–691
Sharma S, Judd WR (1991) Underground opening damage from earthquakes. Eng Geol (Amsterdam) 30:263–276
Shirozu T, Yune S, Isoyama R, Iwamoto T (1996) Report on damage to water distribution pipes caused by the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu (Kobe) earthquake. In: Hamada M, O’Rourke T (eds) Proceedings from the 6th Japan-US workshop on earthquake resistant design of lifeline facilities and countermeasures against soil liquefaction. Technical Report NCEER-96-0012, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan, pp 93–110
Simsek O, Dalgic S (1997) Consolidation properties of the clays at Duzce plain and their relationship with geological evolution. Geol Bull Turkey 40(2):29–38
Srbulov M (2003) An estimation of the ratio between horizontal peak accelerations at the ground surface and at depth. Eur Earthquake Eng XVII(1):59–67
Trifunac MD, Lee VW (1996) Peak surface strains during strong earthquake motion. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 15:311–319
Tromans I (2004) Behaviour of buried water supply pipelines in earthquake zones. PhD thesis, Imperial College, University of London. http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/geotechnics/publications/phdtheses
Wong RCK, Kaiser PK (1988) Design and performance evaluation of vertical shafts: rational shaft design method and verification of design. Canad Geotechn J 25:320–337
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Srbulov, M. (2011). Tunnels, Vertical Shafts and Pipelines. In: Practical Soil Dynamics. Geotechnical, Geological, and Earthquake Engineering, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1312-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1312-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1311-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1312-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)