Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practical Soil Dynamics

Part of the book series: Geotechnical, Geological, and Earthquake Engineering ((GGEE,volume 20))

  • 1824 Accesses

Abstract

Engineers prefer to use codes for design of structures subjected to cyclic and dynamic loads. However, design codes are very brief concerning the seismic response of underground structures (foundations, tunnels, pipelines) and when they provide recommendations on the best practice these recommendations are limited to usual types of structures (buildings) and ground conditions. The users of British Standards are aware that compliance with them does not necessarily confer immunity from relevant statutory and legal requirements. Often engineers need to seek advice and help from specialists in soil dynamics. Because the issues in soil dynamics are rather complex, the specialist use simple considerations and methods not least for checking of the results of more complex analyses. Hence, engineers can use simple considerations and methods for assessment of severity of a problem before engaging specialists for solution of the problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akkar S, Bommer JJ (2007) Empirical prediction for peak ground velocity derived from strong-motion records from Europe and the Middle East. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:511–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN (1988) Engineering seismology. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 17:1–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN, Sarma SK (1999) The assessment of total seismic moment. J Earthquake Eng 3:439–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN, Srbulov M (1994) Attenuation of earthquake induced ground displacements. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 23:467–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN, Srbulov M (1995) Earthquake induced displacements of slopes. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 14:59–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN, Douglas J, Sarma SK, Smit PM (2005) Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral accelerations. Bull Earthquake Eng 3:1–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANSI S2.47 (1990) Vibration of buildings – guidelines for the measurement of vibrations and evaluation of their effects on buildings. American National Standards Institute, Acoustical Society of America, New York, NY, Secretariat for Committees 51, 52 and 53

    Google Scholar 

  • ANSI S3.18 (1979) Guide for the evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibrations. American National Standards Institute, Acoustical Society of America, New York, NY, Secretariat for Committees 51, 52 and 53

    Google Scholar 

  • ANSI S3.29 (1983) Guide to the evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings. American National Standards Institute, Acoustical Society of America, New York, NY, Secretariat for Committees 51, 52 and 53

    Google Scholar 

  • AS 2187.2 (2005) Explosives – storage and use, part 2: use of explosives. Council of Standards Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D1586 Standard test method for standard penetration test (SPT) and split-barrel sampling of soils. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. American National Standards Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D3999-91 Standard test methods for the determination of the modulus and damping properties of soils using the cyclic triaxial apparatus. Annual Book of ASTM Standards 04.08, American Society for Testing and Materials

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D4015-92 Standard test method for modulus and damping of soils by the resonant-column method. Annual Book of ASTM Standards 04.08, American Society for Testing and Materials

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D4428/D 4428 M-00 Standard test methods for crosshole seismic testing. Annual Book of ASTM Standards 04.08, American Society for Testing and Materials

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D4945-08 Standard test method for high-strain dynamic testing of piles. Annual Book of ASTM Standards 04.08, American Society for Testing and Materials

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D5777-00 Standard guide for using the seismic refraction method for subsurface investigation. Annual Book of ASTM Standards 04.08, American Society for Testing and Materials

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D7128-05 Standard guide for using the seismic-reflection method for shallow subsurface investigation. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, American Society for Testing and Materials

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D7400-08 Standard test methods for downhole seismic testing. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, American Society for Testing and Materials

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker GL, Gollub JP (1992) Chaotic dynamics, an introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Bommer JJ, Elnashai AS (1999) Displacement spectra for seismic design. J Earthquake Eng 3:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • BS 5228-2 (2009) Code of practice for noise and vibration control on construction and open sites – part 2: vibration. British Standards Institution

    Google Scholar 

  • BS 6472 (1992) Guide to evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings (1 Hz to 80 Hz). British Standards Institution

    Google Scholar 

  • BS 7385-2 (1993) Evaluation and measurement for vibration in buildings, part 2: guide to damage levels from ground borne vibration. British Standard Institution

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetin KO, Seed RB, Kiureghian AD, Tokimatsu K, Harder LH Jr, Kayen RE, Moss RES (2004) Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential. ASCE J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 130:1314–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough RW, Penzien J (1993) Dynamics of structures, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • CSA Z107.54-M85 (R2001) Procedure for measurement of sound and vibration due to blasting operations. Canadian Standards Association, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • DIN 4024-1 (1988) Maschinenfundamente; Elastische Stützkonstruktionen für Maschinen mit rotierenden Massen. Deutsche Industries Norm

    Google Scholar 

  • DIN 4024-2 (1991) Maschinenfundamente; Steife (starre) Stützkonstruktionen für Maschinen mit periodischer Erregung. Deutsche Industries Norm

    Google Scholar 

  • DIN 4150-3 (1999) Erschütterungen im Bauwesen – Teil 3: Einwirkungen auf bauliche Anlage Norm Ausgabe, Deutsch, Deutsche Industries Norm

    Google Scholar 

  • DIN 45669-1 (1995) Messung von Schwingungsimmissionen; Teil 1: Schwingungsmesser; Anforderungen, Prüfung. Deutsche Industries Norm

    Google Scholar 

  • DIN 45672-1 (1991) Schwingungsmessungen in der Umgebung von Schienenverkehrswegen; Teil 1: Messverfahren. Deutsche Industries Norm

    Google Scholar 

  • EN 1997-2 (2007) Eurocode 7 – geotechnical design, part 2: ground investigation and testing. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • EN 1998-1 (2004) Eurocode 8 – design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • EN 1998-5 (2004) Eurocode 8 – design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 5: foundations, retaining structures and geotechnical aspects. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1944) Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 34:1985–1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin BO (1978) The nature of stress-strain behaviour of soils. In: Proceedings of earthquake engineering and soil dynamics symposium, vol 1, ASCE, Pasadena, CA, pp 3–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin BO, Drnevich VP (1972) Shear modulus and damping in soil: design equations and curves. ASCE J Soil Mech Foundations Div 98:667–692

    Google Scholar 

  • IBC (2009) International Building Code. International Code Council, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishibashi I (1992) Discussion to: Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response, by M. Vucetic and R. Dobry. ASCE J Geotechn Eng 118(5):830–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishibashi I, Zhang X (1993) Unified dynamic shear moduli and damping ratios of sand and clay. Soils Foundations 33(1):182–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO 2631/2 (1989) Evaluation of human exposure to whole body vibration, part 2: continuous and shock induced vibration in buildings (1–8 Hz). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 2631/3 (1995) Evaluation of human exposure to whole body vibration, part 3: evaluation of exposure to whole body z-axis vertical vibration in frequency range 0.1–1.63 Hz. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 4866 (1990) Evaluation and measurement for vibration in buildings. Part 1: guide for measurement of vibrations and evaluation of their effects on buildings. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 6897 (1994) Guidelines for the evaluation of the response of occupants of fixed structures, especially buildings and off-shore structures to low frequency horizontal motion (0.063 to 1 Hz). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 8041 (1990) Human response to vibration – measuring instrumentation. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 8569 (1996) Mechanical vibration and shock measurement and evaluation of shock and vibration effects on sensitive equipment in buildings. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 9996 (1996) Mechanical vibration – disturbance to human activity and performance; classification. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 10811-1 (2000) Mechanical vibration and shock – vibration and shock in buildings with sensitive equipment – part 1: measurement and evaluation. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 10811-2 (2000) Mechanical vibration and shock – vibration and shock in buildings with sensitive equipment – part 2: classification. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 10815 (1996) Mechanical vibration – measurement of vibration generated internally in railway tunnels by the passage of trains. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14837-1 (2005) Mechanical vibration – ground-borne noise and vibration arising from rail systems – part 1: general guidance. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 23469 (2005) Bases for design of structures – seismic actions for designing geotechnical works. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamiolkowski M, Leroueil S, LoPriesti DCF (1991) Theme lecture: Design parameters from theory to practice. In: Proceedings Geo-Coast ’91, Yokohama, Japan, pp 1–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Road Association (2002) Specifications for highway bridges, part V: seismic design. PWRI, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao SSC, Whitman RV (1986) Overburden correction factors for SPT in sand. ASCE J Geotechn Eng 112:373–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin SY, Lin PS, Luo H-S, Juag CH (2000) Shear modulus and damping ratio characteristics of gravely deposits. Canad Geotechn J 37:638–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaou S, Mylonakis G, Gazetas G, Tazoh T (2001) Kinematic pile bending during earthquakes: analysis and field measurements. Geotechnique 51(5):425–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NS 8141 (1993) Vibrasjoner og støt – MÃ¥ling av svingehastighet og beregning av veiledende grenseverdier for Ã¥ unngÃ¥ skade pÃ¥ byggverk. Standard Norge

    Google Scholar 

  • OENORM S9020 (1986) Bauwerkserschütterungen; Sprengerschütterungen und vergleichbare impulsförmige Immissionen. Nationale Festlegungen, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1970) Soil modules and damping factors for dynamic response analyses. Report EERC 70-10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. ASCE J Soil Mech Foundation Div 107:1249–1274

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF, Chung RM (1985) Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. ASCE J Geotechn Eng 111:1425–1445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skempton AW (1986) Standard penetration test procedures and the effects in sands of overburden pressure, relative density, particle size, aging and over consolidation. Geotechnique 36:425–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skipp BO (1998) Ground vibration – codes and standards. In: Skipp BO (ed) Ground dynamics and man-made processes. The Institution of Civil Engineers, United Kingdom, 29–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Srbulov M (2003) An estimation of the ratio between horizontal peak accelerations at the ground surface and at depth. Eur Earthquake Eng XVII(1):59–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Srbulov M (2010) Ground vibration engineering – simplified analyses with case studies and examples. Springer, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • SS 460 48 66 (1991) Vibration och stöt – Riktvärden för sprängningsinducerade vibrationer i byggnader Fastställd. Swedish Standard Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RN (ed) (1994) Geotechnical centrifuge technology. Blackie Academic & Professional, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • TS 10354 (1992) Air blast and ground vibration in mining. Turkish Standard Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • US DOT-293630-1 (1998) High-speed ground transportation noise and vibration impact assessment. U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Railroad Development, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Vucetic M, Dobry R (1991) Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. ASCE J Geotechn Eng 117(1):89–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf JP (1994) Foundation vibration analysis using simple physical models. PTR Prentice Hall, Upper saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Youd TL, Idriss IM (2001) Liquefaction resistance of soil. Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. ASCE J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 127:297–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Milutin Srbulov .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Srbulov, M. (2011). Introduction. In: Practical Soil Dynamics. Geotechnical, Geological, and Earthquake Engineering, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1312-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics