Skip to main content

Sustainable Urban Form

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

With more than half of the world’s population living in urban areas and climate change, one of the biggest challenges of our times, it is time to turn our attention to cities in order to tackle this challenge. The layout or urban form of a city can influence the environmental impact of the urban settlement to a considerable extent. There are great differences between cities in terms of their urban form and their environmental footprints. Five key elements of urban form can be distinguished: density, surface, land use, road/public transport infrastructure and the economic relationship with the surrounding environment. The compact city is often advocated as a more sustainable urban form but this is not undisputed. Urban form can influence the environmental impact, but it can only facilitate; it is people and their behaviour that ultimately determine the negative or positive environmental impact of urban areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrams C (1971) The Language of cities, a glossary of terms. The Viking Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson WP, Kanaroglou PS, Miller EJ (1996) Urban form, energy and the environment: a review of issues, evidence and policy. Urban Stud 33(1):7–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besset M (1987) LeCorbusier, to live with the light. The Architectural Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Breheny M (1992) The contradictions of the compact city: A review. In: Breheny M (ed.) Sustainable development and urban form. Pion, London, pp 138–159

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (1990) Green paper on the urban environment, COM(90)218 final. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (2004) Towards a thematic strategy on the urban environment, COM(2004) 60 final. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (2006) Thematic strategy on the urban environment, COM(2005) 718 final. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (2007) Green Paper. Towards a new culture for urban mobility (presented by the Commission), COM(2007)551 final. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoff P, Low N (2000) Recent Australian urban policy and the environment. In: Low NP, Gleeson B, Elander I, Lidskog R (eds.) Consuming Cities: the urban environment in the global economy after the Rio declaration. Routledge, London, pp 241–264

    Google Scholar 

  • CSD (Committee on Spatial Development) (1999) European spatial development perspective: Towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the EU. Office for Official Publications of the European Community, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker EH, Elliott S, Smith FA, Blake DR, Rowland FS (2000) Energy and material flow through the urban ecosystem. Annu Rev Energy Environ 25:685–740

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieleman FM, Dijst M, Burghouwt G (2002) Urban form and travel behaviour: Micro-level household attributes and residential context. Urban Stud 39(3):507–527. doi:10.1080/00420980220112801

  • Garreau J (1991) Edge city: life on the new frontier. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • German Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Affairs (2007) Leipzig charter on sustainable European cities. agreed at the occasion of the informal ministerial meeting on urban development and territorial cohesion on 24/25 May 2007, www.bmvbs.de/en/dokumente/-,1872.982774/Artikel/dokument.htm Accessed 14 Apr 2009

  • Gleeson B (2008) Critical Commentary, walking from the dream: an Australian perspective on urban resilience. Urban Stud 45(13):2653–2668

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabareen YR (2006) Sustainable urban forms: their typologies, models, and concepts. J Plan Educ Res 2006(26):38

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessen J (1997) Führt das städtebauliche Leitbild der kompakten und durchmischten Stadt zur Stadt der kurzen Wege? In: Bose M (ed.) Die unaufhaltsame Auflösung der Stadt in die Region? Kritische Betrachtungen neuer Leitbilder, Konzepte, Kooperationsstrategien und Verwaltungsstrukturen für Stadtregionen. Harburger Berichte zur Stadtplanung Band 9, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001) Territorial outlook. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams K (2000) Does intensifying cities make them more sustainable? In: Williams K, Burton E, Jenks M (eds.) Achieving sustainable urban form. E & FN Spon, London, pp 30–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeang K (1999) K. Yeang, Planning the sustainable city as the vertical-city-in-the-sky. In: Foo AF, Yuen B (eds.) Sustainable cities in the 21st century. National University of Singapore, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

Further reading

  • Borrego C et al (2006) How urban structure can affect city sustainability from an air quality perspective. Environ Modell Softw 21:461–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummond P, Swain C (1992) The compact city and urban sustainability: conflicts and complexities. In: Burton E, Williams K, Jenks M (eds.) The compact city, A sustainable urban form. E & FN Spon, London, pp 231–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth A, Oakes JM, Schmitz KH, Hearst M (2007) Does residential density increase walking and other physical activity? Urban Stud 44:679–697. doi:10.1080/00420980601184729

  • Holden E, Norland IT (2005) Three challenges for the compact city as a sustainable urban form: Household consumption of energy and transport in eight residential areas in the greater Oslo region. Urban Stud 42(12):2145–2166

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall S (2005) Urban pattern specification. Institute of Community Studies, London paper presented at Solutions symposium, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwanen T, Dijst M, Dieleman FM (2008) Policies for urban form and their impact on travel: The Netherlands experience. Urban Stud 41(3):579–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton P (2000) Urban form and environmental performance. In: Williams K, Burton E, Jenks M (eds.) Achieving a sustainable urban form. E & FN Spon, London, pp 46–52

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This chapter has been prepared in parallel with a European Commission funded research project on urban metabolism – Sustainable Metabolism in Europe (SUME; EU project number 212034). The author is grateful to the members of the SUME consortium for their contributions to the project to the content of this chapter. In particular, Dominic Stead, from Delft University of Technology, has provided various comments and inputs to this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jody Milder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science +Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Milder, J. (2012). Sustainable Urban Form. In: van Bueren, E., van Bohemen, H., Itard, L., Visscher, H. (eds) Sustainable Urban Environments. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1294-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics